BetSelection.cc

Please login or register.

Topic: MB 16  (Read 26564 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline XXVV

  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 1624
  • Gender: Male
  • Legio XX Valeria Victrix LVX
    • View Profile
Re: MB 16
« Reply #45 on: July 05, 2016, 09:04:37 am »
  • ReplyReply
  • Last session for the evening.

    10 outcomes, 9 of which succeed, ie 90% SR

    12
    --
    36
    12
    --
    26
    4
    36
    26
    12  WF
    ---
    36
    6
    --
    24
    7
    34
    __

    5
    --
    30
    3
    ---
    35
    --
    11
    ---
    5
    ---

    You would have to say this was a most amicable sequence. Hit and run.

    1
    2
    5
    2
    3
    1
    2
    1
    1
    1
    ---

    RB finishes at +80,390 units  and for this session +32 base units  using the 2 phase play


    Offline XXVV

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 1624
    • Gender: Male
    • Legio XX Valeria Victrix LVX
      • View Profile
    Re: MB 16
    « Reply #46 on: July 05, 2016, 11:23:08 pm »
  • ReplyReply
  • Well Palladio has achieved one part of the current roulette MM goal and achieved a RB of +100,000 units before being wiped out by self sabotage or unforeseen adverse corrective cycles which is what partly happened in the experiments with xxvv and xxvv#2 on the rouletteplayers.org.

    I have totally changed my view on that table and the data spins used. In my personal view they are as SH has described on rouletteforum and I hugely respect this undertaking which has proven a very useful tool for learning and improvement of technique.

    Early today we had two fast strikes ( the best sort of session) and the RB balance has now increased to +102,315 units. Recall the starting RB was 1000 and step by step this has built but not until there had been a few bounces off the bottom and re-funding totaling about 10,000 units before critical mass for takeoff was established and then also a better balance  and distribution of 'weighting' between my various techniques and the MM could really kick in.

    Current play is now anchored with the MB16 corner bets ( fixed model) and overlaid with occasional WF opportunities especially when less than 5 targets, and use of the private bet for access to special targets for finales and streets especially, sometimes wheel sections.

    Previous play using the private bet I found had too much variance and volatility. By harnessing the simplicity and spread of the fixed 16 targets this gave some stability as long as stops were in place to NOT chase losses but instead to choose to play live especially when the mode was in win cycle and some big hits could occur. That is how the bet efficiency has now been improved and some confidence ( always will be tested) has been established in a balance between bet selection and money management. Also the relative success has motivated a more considered less risky attack and approach to the game, at this stage anyway, reducing the tendency to self destruct.

    A tipping point is the sufficiency of a RB. I can risk up to 20-25% in one extreme within a session but of course would much prefer play within a 5-10% usage of RB. Thus there is strong motivation to increase the RB because there is an effective table limit here and that limits upward and downward velocity.

    Here is an example I will share with you which is from my Private Bet knowledge but it illustrates beautifully why I regard these are genuine live spin sessions. These characteristics can be found in RNG work but I feel not so compact and elegant. Of course it is not always like this and one trick is avoid the more chaotic passages and instead try to focus and wait for these sorts of situations as I illustrate here.

    30
    8
    27
    19
    ---
    22
    31
    --   consider 22/31/18 as one point bounded by 19 to form a circle - what extends beyond/before/ after 19....27
    18
    19
    ----
    [b]27[/b]
    7
    24
    1
    14
    ---  again symmetry at 14 with 1 on either side - you can see it coming
    1

    Two short sessions

    25
    --   1
    23
    2
    ---  2
    5
    ---  1
    32
    ---  1

    0
    28
    31
    ---  3
    29
    4
    23
    19
    ---- 4
    25
    --- 1
    31
    --- 1
    14
    --- 1
    2
    --  1
    25
    --- 1
    33
    34
    ---  2
    35
    --- 1
    32
    --- 1
    5
    --- 1
    14
    --- 1
    9
    7
    4
    26
    7
    30
    8
    27
    19
    --- 9
    22
    31
    --- 2
    18
    19
    ---  2

    27
    7
    24
    1
    14
    ---- 5  and close
    1
    ----------------------

    Then later after observing virtual play

    32
    ---  1
    20
    --  1
    6
    --- 1
    24
    18
    17
    --- 3
    14  hit and target on A street
    --- 1
    12
    --- 1  and close   RB  + 102,315 units


    Offline XXVV

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 1624
    • Gender: Male
    • Legio XX Valeria Victrix LVX
      • View Profile
    Re: MB 16
    « Reply #47 on: July 06, 2016, 02:14:24 am »
  • ReplyReply
  • Latest Palladio works...

    11
    --- 1
    17
    --- 1
    5
    --- 1  join the game live
    14
    --- 1
    28
    8
    27
    15
    ---- 4
    6
    --- 1
    2
    --- 1
    21
    24
    27   27
    25
    21   21
    21   hit WF
    31
    ---- 7
    19
    --- 1
    26
    26  26
    20 
    ----- 3
    28
    1
    17
    ---- 3
    23
    36
    22
    18
    23   23
    3
    --- 6
    3      3
    --- 1
    2
    --- 1
    5
    --- 1
    29
    22   22
    3   hit WF
    --- 3
    6
    --- 1

    a delightful session using some tight WF overlays as well.

    RB  closes at + 112,065 units

    Offline XXVV

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 1624
    • Gender: Male
    • Legio XX Valeria Victrix LVX
      • View Profile
    Re: MB 16
    « Reply #48 on: July 06, 2016, 09:04:26 am »
  • ReplyReply
  • We peaked at about 115,000 units and third on the table.

    The past 6 hours I tested the parameters of the bets to destruction to see just how far we could go. There can be difficult sequences and I will publish these tomorrow. It is clear the anchor bet needs to maintain dominance as the variance on the exotic bets can be damaging.

    Fascinating stuff and we are considering building a bot to considered parameters ( including taking real money profit when offered -lol).

    Have bounced back to 22,000 units and will use this platform for a new approach much more conservative and less volatile to risk exposure.


    Thanks for all your interest. This study has really surprised me and demonstrated that especially in short controlled and selected bursts this combo overlapping bet can be most effective. For a longer bot approach the bet can be de-tuned.

    It has been a fascinating week of research.

    Next on my agenda will be a WF variation for a moving window of 16 targets and the parameter will again be based on 16 triggers and their behaviour. As this will be a dynamic and always warm, sometimes hot collection this should produce greater continuity and lesser corrective cycles, ie a positive edge?

    I will be pleased to hear from those who have developed their own unique WF variations should you wish to combine R+D.

    For those who have contacted wrt R+D on MB16 and MB MM,  I will be in touch soon.
    Best
    R.

    Offline XXVV

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 1624
    • Gender: Male
    • Legio XX Valeria Victrix LVX
      • View Profile
    Re: MB 16
    « Reply #49 on: July 07, 2016, 03:03:57 am »
  • ReplyReply
  • Well it's a new day and it always amazes me how different 'things' can appear compared to the afternoon prior where fatigue had set in and we were on a crash dive training course. In other words I was fiddling with the tuning of comparative bets on the MB16 platform and lost my way, forgetting how essential it is to maintain dominance by the logic of a 90% strike rate in the face of random generation of outcomes that eventually start appearing as being designed by some entity in order to show how silly you are. An outside entity is not necessary because once you get to this stage you are already clearly very foolish.

    So yes 115,000 units broke down to zero in three tranches that accelerated on the way down.

    Of course I can rationalise that in this 'testing' context and not 'real money' it does not matter. Do not be fooled I have seen others, and I have seen myself crash and burn with banks brought to the table where due care was not taken for a variety of most interesting reasons - for there are always reasons.

    We could joke that these were 0.01 cent units or worse 0.10 cent units, but what if they were 1 EUR or 5 EUR.

    The principle is what matters here, and sure in this case, again, some valuable lessons have been seen, if not as yet fully learned or more importantly 'assimilated' so that they ( the new rules) become 'second nature' which is another word for automatic consciousness or sub consciousness. This is how we train ourselves if we are alive and alert and willing. Most players show none of these qualities and that is why so many make the same mistakes over and over again, and 'gambling' context is really a potential 'house of learning' as well as the usual 'house of pain' and repeating patterns that come with addictive behaviour.

    Relax. This is not any judgmental commentary, but simply a light hearted observation on an experience yesterday where I played far too long where 'curiosity' killed the cat.

    Fortunately we can wake from this dream, and even yesterday later in the day a recovery to +22.000 units was achieved, and just now over a 50 minute session the RB went up again to +30,250 units.

    In fact I achieved + 8,250 units in 54 live spins played being 23 outcomes.

    Recall the base rate of earning for the B16 corner bets based on 2/3/5/7 + SL  + 2/3/5/7 at higher unit values x5.

    1  +10
    2  +7
    3  +5
    4  +0

    5  -22
    6  -37
    7  -47
    8  -72  this is the 2 phase progression play I often refer to

    and I do not recommend going any further with the progression ( ie two phases) - better to SL ( -432 units) and disburse that by other means already discussed.

    here are the outcomes from this afternoon

    1
    --  and join the game
    2
    3
    2
    1
    4
    1
    1
    2
    4
    3
    4
    2
    5
    1
    1
    4
    1
    1
    4
    1
    2
    3
    ---- pause

    4
    4
    4
    1
    4
    4
    3
    1
    6
    1
    2
    1
    --- and play one extra
    2
    --- take profit now and observe one more outcome
    1


    Theoretical earning from outcomes played live  +115 units ** and actually earned +8250 units  using base $25 units and overlay WF and PB.

    ** same spins flat staked -9 o/a ( too many 4's and note the bullets we dodged ahead).

    Later I will publish the 'challenging' sequences from yesterday.

    In the fresh clear light of a new day let us see just how frightening they are to a calm rested mind.

    Notice also that my staking strategy is deliberately tailored ( skewed) to the unique and curious rouletteplayers.org table configuration loaded against the players by the absence of splits on Zero and thus the inability to load Zero at key times ( which I do in professional play).

    When I show the actual spins for this session you will understand what I mean.

    12
    18
    14
    1
    33
    3
    8
    19
    20
    30
    1    1
    10
    3    3
    5
    11
    29
    20   20
    28
    1     hit WF
    ----

    26
    16
    21
    26   26
    17
    9
    1   one of my techniques is to target past WF win  hit
    ---
    8
    31
    7
    3
    23
    0
    0  0
    0  hit WF  stunning but artificially skewed  here
    ---
    3
    17
    14
    4
    29
    25
    32
    32  32
    11
    24
    28
    30
    12
    11  11
    30  30
    20
    0    hit
    ---
    36
    32  WF hit
    ---

    28
    27
    26
    2
    1
    33
    10
    17
    11
    7
    22
    10   10
    11   11
    27
    24
    31
    34
    1      1
    24   24
    10   WF hit
    ----
    36
    22
    35
    12
    0
    20
    17
    7
    16
    3
    ------

    By the way flat staking for this corner bet technique illustrates what mode the session is in. A winning flat stake is a great signal to attack, but how long will it continue? - empirical study shows to gain +10 or more is a great place/ space/ phase at which to take profit on the corner bet.

    The exotic bets may wander on more curious trails but in this instance WF was in good form.


    Offline XXVV

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 1624
    • Gender: Male
    • Legio XX Valeria Victrix LVX
      • View Profile
    Re: MB 16
    « Reply #50 on: July 07, 2016, 07:43:22 am »
  • ReplyReply
  • Here are the outcomes in yesterday's losing sessions.

    We start at RB +115,940 units

    2   +7
    1   +10
    6   SL at 4
    2    -37  becomes 6th step as move to phase 2 staking
    1   +10
    2   +7   -3 o/a
    4
    1   +10  +7 o/a
    6    SL at 4
    1   -22 as hit on 5th play
    1   +10
    4
    2   +7  +2 o/a
    4
    2    +7
    1    +10 + 19 o/a
    6    SL at 4
    2    -37 as hit on 6th spin
    1    +10   
    1    +10
    1    +10    +12 o/a
    2     +7     +19 o/a
    5     SL at 4
    4     -72 units   -53 units o/a
    1     +10
    3     +5
    1     +10
    1     +10
    2     +7
    1     +10  -1 o/a
    8     SL at 4
    2     -37
    1     +10
    4
    2     +7
    2     +7
    1     +10
    1     +10  o/a  +7
    4
    2     +7
    3     +5
    1     +10
    1     +10  +39 o/a
    3     +5
    1     +10
    2     +7    +61 o/a
    4
    5     SL at 4
    1      -22
    1     +10
    1     +10  +59 o/a
    8     SL at 4
    4     -72
    3      +5
    3      +5
    1      +10  +7 o/a
    4
    3      +5
    1      +10
    1      +10
    2      +7
    2      +7
    1      +10  +56  o/a
    5      SL at 4
    3       -47
    5      SL at 4
    2       -37
    5      SL a  4
    2       -37   -65 o/a
    1       +10
    3       +5
    2       +7
    1       +10
    3       +5
    1       +10  -18 o/a
    5       SL at 4
    2       -37
    3       +5
    5       SL at 4
    1       -22   -72 o/a
    4
    7       SL at 4
    3       -47    -119 o/a
    2       +7
    1       +10
    1       +10
    1       +10
    1       +10
    1       +10  -62 o/a
    2       +7
    1       +10
    3       +5
    2       +7    -33 o/a
    2       +7
    1       +10
    3       +5
    1       +10
    1       +10
    2       +7    +16 o/a
    13     SL at 4
    3       -47
    1       +10  -21 o/a
    6       SL at 4
    4       -72   -93 o/a
    1       +10
    1       +10
    1       +10
    2       +7
    2       +7
    2       +7
    1       +10
    2       +7
    1       +10  -15 o/a
    4
    3       +5
    1       +10
    2       +7
    1       +10
    1       +10
    1       +10
    1       +10
    2       +7     +54 o/a
    4
    1       +10
    2       +7
    3       +5
    3       +5
    3       +5
    1       +10
    1       +10  +106 o/a
    5       SL at 4
    4       -72                       overall  +34 base units using 2 phase play
    ---  and close session

    On re-visiting and logical use of stop loss it does not appear too scary - it shows my 'weighting' was probably over- tilted toward 30% mix of MB 16 corner bets and 70% exotic bets which were not co-operating because of random distribution. The beauty of the MB16 is that it stands as a pretty sensible rock of 90% strike rate which can go astray occasionally but usually often only in short passages ( corrections) of 20-30 spins.

    Secret to success is to withstand these swings and stop loss where suggested on MB 16 at those times.

    This passage could easily be managed with a clear focus

    1
    1
    2
    13  SL on 4
    3
    1  okay
    6  SL on 4
    4
    1
    1
    1  all okay  -lol

    Or also consider the earlier passage

    2
    1
    5
    3
    5
    2
    5
    2
    1  okay

    Or soon after

    1
    5
    2
    3
    5
    1
    4
    7
    3
    2
    1
    1
    1  okay

    -----

    Had there been

    5


    then a result of SL at -432 units would be required.  This is a vulnerability and the following anticipated run of win phase would be run in higher value units, but probably not till the following next day session for cool heads.

    Or perhaps instead keep play within one phase and simply play for  -72 units after and -72 units and then keep it simple to recover.


    I will re-work the results for this session to see how this revised approach would have compared.

    I have yet to determine how frequently such major corrections can occur.
    Clearly there is much to learn from my over-reactions while playing the exotic bets overlaying the MB16. Instead of neutralising threats of loss they tilted variance toward excessive loss, so this is a lesson in the need to improve and stay vigilant with money management.

    Best Wishes
    xxvv

    Offline Moccoman

    • Member
    • **
    • Posts: 6
      • View Profile
    Re: MB 16
    « Reply #51 on: July 07, 2016, 08:38:13 am »
  • ReplyReply
  • Just an update.

    I have now tested 7000 of the 20000 spins and it has yet to be broken.

    Now don't take that as a positive, as it has been almost there on number of occasions. My results to date are:

               1      2     3    4    5    6   7  8   9  10  11 12  Total   Profit/Loss
    1000  180 101  62  27  17  15  2  5   0   1    0   0  410      1501
    2000  196 102  52  30  15  10  9  2   1   0    2   0  419        828
    3000  171 110  55  34  20  12  7  0   1   0    0   0  410      1376
    4000  156   88  64  25  21  14  4  2   0   0    1   0  375        855
    5000  176   89  53  28  22    9  6  2   4   1    0   0  390         -70  Loss
    6000  151 106  60  31  19  10  3  3   3   1    0   1  388        197
    7000  135   94  33  30  22    8  6  1   2   3    2   1  337     -1074  Loss

    So, 3,613 units profit from 7,000 spins, but all of that was made in the first 3,000 spins and just treading water for the next 4,000 spins.

    If you were to reset at the stop loss point (-72 units) and then continuing without the progression, after 7,000 spins that is sitting at a loss of 1,821 units. So no joy there.

    With spins 6000 to 7000, almost every 100 spins in the sequence had issues. Playing live you would have just taken the loss at some point along the way and gone home.

    6000-6100  An 11
    6101-6200  A 10
    6201-6300  A 9 and a 7
    6301-6400  An 8 and a 7
    6401-6500  A 10 and an 11
    6501-6600  A 7
    6601-6700  A 7 and a 12
    6701-6800  Nothing serious
    6801-6900  A 9
    6901-7000 Two 7s and a 10

    The testing continues, but at least I know now what can and does happen, even if there is no total loss of bankroll.

    Cheers
    Mocco
       

    Offline XXVV

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 1624
    • Gender: Male
    • Legio XX Valeria Victrix LVX
      • View Profile
    Re: MB 16
    « Reply #52 on: July 07, 2016, 11:14:36 pm »
  • ReplyReply
  • Thanks Mocco

    So very useful to see the behaviour of this bet.

    All the warning signs are there, that there may be some very stormy losses, especially when the edge is approached too close for comfort several times.

    This is the perennial problem with progressions for a bet that has no winning edge.

    With a losing bet there is no solution by any progression, and the decision is where to draw the line and then go into the mathematical mind of Martin Blakey to see how in most cases a way out can be found, and I have already alluded to a few approaches.

    As he has written, whole sessions can go with no need for complex progression or retrieval from a hole, and as we see with those first 3000 spins tested, and some that I have published the way forward is easy by being fortunate enough ( lucky) to encounter mainly win cycles.

    However, there may be others sessions where the direction is down and direct, and only a stop loss can save total catastrophic loss thereafter the entire session and possibly additional sessions may be necessary to continue the retrieval of RB.

    Worst case scenario, and depending on the size and scale of the RB, there may simply be a risk bank loss and yes MB did encounter that at times ( although he did not mention that in his published work). I think it was Jason Chan who advised me that as he often played with MB live in Melbourne, he saw RB losses from time to time. That is most helpful to know, and of course very sensible. I believe the losses were usually in the order of 1000 units at $5 units. They were rare but did occur, and in the medium and long term MB was a winner, and a professional.

    Even with a bet that has a proven positive edge there will still be corrective cycles to deal with. The really smart way is to step aside and dodge the bullet, which I sometimes refer to as my 'toe-in-the-water' technique. I often find that within 20-30 spins the flavour of a session can be forecast. Sometimes it is wiser to walk away with a small loss.

    Offline XXVV

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 1624
    • Gender: Male
    • Legio XX Valeria Victrix LVX
      • View Profile
    Re: MB 16
    « Reply #53 on: July 07, 2016, 11:32:12 pm »
  • ReplyReply
  • Still experimenting in my live play with how to best handle and develop a hybrid bet that is essentially close to break even, and therefore with an easy opportunity to short progress and then if needed apply an MB loss recovery technique. That is still to be investigated.

    Here is a session from this morning.

    Outcomes

    6     SL at 4
    3     -47
    4
    13   SL at 4
    1    -22       o/a -69
    1    +10
    3    +5
    2    +7
    1    +10  -37 o/a
    4
    2    +7
    1    +10
    2    +7
    2    +7
    3    +5
    2    +7
    3    +5
    2    +7
    3    +5
    1    +10
    3    +5  o/a  +38 units
    5    SL at 4
    1    -22
    1    +10
    1    +10  o/a +36
    3    +5
    3    +5
    1    +10
    1    +10
    1    +10
    1    +10
    2    +7   o/a +93 units
    5    SL at 4
    4    -72       o/a  +21 units
    1    +10
    2    +7
    3    +5
    4
    ----  session ends  +43 units[/b]  but note how close it came to a bad loss with the 5 then 4 outcome ( just in time )  101 spins

    38 outcomes thus 2.35 spins/ outcome  with 13 the extreme

    There were 7 Zero outcomes - good profit for the parallel RB.  Zero was hot.

    Offline XXVV

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 1624
    • Gender: Male
    • Legio XX Valeria Victrix LVX
      • View Profile
    Re: MB 16
    « Reply #54 on: July 08, 2016, 12:26:27 am »
  • ReplyReply
  • Recall what MB said - you can have entire sessions free of any progression drama.

    This was the latest with outcomes listed.

    1  +10
    1  +10
    1  +10
    1  +10
    5  SL at 4
    1   -22
    1  +10
    3  +5
    1  +10
    2  +7
    3  +5
    1  +10
    2  +7
    2  +7
    1  +10
    1  +10
    2  +7
    1  +10
    2  +7
    1  +10
    1  +10
    1  +10
    3  +5
    1  +10
    1  +10
    2  +7
    2  +7           and close  +192 base units   44 spins and 27 outcomes  1.7  spins per outcome- very positive.

    This session enabled me to lift the account balance from a troubled +15,000 units to a more relaxed +52,000 units.

    Sometimes you can arrive, climb on and it is mainly very simple. 

    As always we advise to play such sessions very aggressively, and play challenging sessions very defensively.

    The deceptively simple toe-in-the-water (TITW) strategy is a very helpful aid. It worked beautifully on the two sessions this morning as a guide for what was to follow over 50-100 spin cycles.

    Offline XXVV

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 1624
    • Gender: Male
    • Legio XX Valeria Victrix LVX
      • View Profile
    Re: MB 16
    « Reply #55 on: July 08, 2016, 09:19:59 am »
  • ReplyReply
  • It is a fascinating journey with the RB moving up and down touching 83,000 at one point and then halving. We finished this evening at about +60,000 units which is a useful platform for experiments over the coming week.

    Now in all my testing I came across today for the first time in about 20,000 spins a killer sequence- and of course it had to happen and you might say there was no warning. here is part of the sequence of outcomes.

    4
    11
    1     -22
    5
    3     -47
    1
    1
    5
    3     -47  perhaps you could say 3 red flags  -in going this far we have risked up to 272 units in the phase 2 progression
    2
    3
      we could introduce a strategic rule - if the 'tone' or direction of the session is high risk, ie 2 or 3 near misses - then close the session
    2
    3
    12
    4   close to being a disaster but saved at -72
    1
    4
    1
    3   well the above was bad enough and probably a warning to keep clear but see what follows
    5
    6
    5  SL
    3  would have to go to 4th phase and that is not sound so I think the policy is best to stop at -432 after two phases lost and take cover
    1
    1  re-start
    1       I think the MB strategy would be to recover the 432 as the priority and as you see  a run of win corrections ( x6) is a great help
    1
    1
    1
    2
    1
    4
    2
    1
    1
    2
    1
    2
    2
    3
    5
    4
    2
    3
    7
    1
    2
    1
    1
    6
    4  close to being a -422 loss but once again scraped in at -72  TOTAL FOR THIS SESSION  -521 base units
    2
    -----

    Over the weekend will be writing to some dedicated correspondents on this work and reading MB book and correspondence from Jason Chan.

    Offline XXVV

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 1624
    • Gender: Male
    • Legio XX Valeria Victrix LVX
      • View Profile
    Re: MB 16
    « Reply #56 on: July 08, 2016, 11:44:50 pm »
  • ReplyReply
  • Please notice that for the previous difficult session this was the first that showed a net loss at -521  units.
    You have seen that with the Moccoman data there are losses and a break even pattern over the last 4000 spins tested with the first 3000 spins showing a useful profit.

    Even though the MB16 has a 90% SR over a 1-4 step progression, what really counts is how we handle the remaining 10%.

    That is the area I will be exploring over the next few weeks.

    My personal view is that MB was able to resolve and recover a useful proportion ( for example 2/3 or 66%) of that loss but that a proportion ( maybe less than 1/3) had to be written off - just not worth chasing risk versus return.

    It may take a few months but what I want to discover and share here is a way using a 'dead' bet to produce a winning result.

    Further, that it will be possible to then describe a 'dynamic'  ( ie adjustable) bet that can actually improve the betselection accuracy.

    So we are looking at Bet Format ( corners and sixlines)-  Bet Selection (improving the accuracy of the bet) - MM - Money Management

    As noted in the previous post - we add a strategic play rule - if the session demonstrates high risk ( near miss of failure of the progression in 2 or 3 incidents) then abandon the session - it is in corrective mode.

    Offline XXVV

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 1624
    • Gender: Male
    • Legio XX Valeria Victrix LVX
      • View Profile
    Re: MB 16
    « Reply #57 on: July 09, 2016, 02:35:58 am »
  • ReplyReply
  • Just as a note of encouragement, here is a session this morning 10 spins and the RB grew by 20,000.

    Yes there is risk of loss, and at some times it is wise to step aside and even take a small loss to get out but today as I joined the table 17 was hit so as that is a 1 spin hit I jumped in quite aggressively and sure enough there was a good series. I closed the session after six consecutive live outcomes.

    17 
    --- 1
    15  hit
    --- 1
    6   hit
    ----1
    29
    27
    34  hit
    ---3
    32  hit multiplied also by street hit and wheel section hit
    ---1
    19 hit
    ---1
    26
    17 hit
    ---2

    Close session +62 base units    RB  +81,500 units

    Offline XXVV

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 1624
    • Gender: Male
    • Legio XX Valeria Victrix LVX
      • View Profile
    Re: MB 16
    « Reply #58 on: July 09, 2016, 02:50:33 am »
  • ReplyReply
  • I should also point out that the MB16 has a 90% SR for bets 1-4 inclusive.

    To go to the second phase and SL on a lost 4 and use the eventual win as a trigger to re-start ( whether 5 or 13 or more as I have encountered ie 16 x 13 which is 'only' 208 spins equivalent - could be worse) and working to then achieve within the next 4 attempts or else a loss of 432 units, this has the impact of a SR greater than 90%.

    I need to calculate this on an empirical large sample - more on this later.

    Offline XXVV

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 1624
    • Gender: Male
    • Legio XX Valeria Victrix LVX
      • View Profile
    Re: MB 16
    « Reply #59 on: July 09, 2016, 04:18:26 am »
  • ReplyReply
  • Here are some strategic play thoughts for this bet.

    #1   Read the context - at least for 2-3 spins prior and if you see one or two 1 spin hits, attack.  If you see 3 or greater just pause, and l and look at another table or another time.

    #2  If you join the game try to gain quick profit and once secured, ease back and do not give back. Keep win sessions short.

    #3  Go WITH the current trend and do not attempt to predict change for this bet approach as there may be quite a lot of momentum for corrective passages as we have seen.  If it is in a win cycle climb on and take quick profit then get out before 10 outcomes.

    #4  Consider various play MODES. For this terminology I am grateful to a brilliant colleague in Australia. What is a corrective phase for the current nominated 4 corner bets may be a win phase for another set of corner bets. So consider 2-3 adjustable corner bet variations and be prepared to be dynamic, not fixed, and adjust the MODE to a more appropriate grouping. MB had several to work from and had an assistant at the table to advise based on early outcomes.

    #5  Consider also doing to a degree what I have attempted and OVERLAY additional bets above the corners. The post following will illustrate this with sixline and street bets. Also you may consider playing the corner bets when the middle column is dominant as all the corner bets have 8 targets in the middle column. I have a private bet technique for columns and I will test overlaying this with the corner bets to see if we can add to the bet selection efficiency. We want targets that are more likely to appear within four attempts.