Off course Legion 20 Valerie Victrix...., however there are some persons who belief that other persons realy believe in CEH and Simon.
As if we were......lol......
I was there from the beginning when the thread started about W3M years ago. It was on, if i rememberd well, VLS first roulette forum or either the VIP forum. It was started by K2.
If anything good came out of this all it must be " The Edge ", and i do not mean the gitarist The Edge....i just mention this because you never know, some persons might believe that "The Edge " realy exist......lol.....
Yes well done Carlitos !
That "Edge Bet" mmmmm.....
I mentioned yesterday in my other thread that almost certainly no 'bet', per se, will solve your quest in roulette or baccarat.
The answer lies in market speak 'drilling down
' and using the metaphor of a bet within a bet, it is more about investigating ways to first find a way to gain a real positive edge range ( always a range/ band because Ecart swings/ moves like the tide) through empirical live data tests.
Once you have the proven data and the selection of window of time and opportunity/location, then you construct your bet.
My preferred way is cluster analysis of elements below the surface
of outflowing spin sequences, and thus it is essential to see the living continuity of spin sequences in short to medium cycles in this method.
There are other ways based on medium to longer cycles of spin outcomes, and possibly also others relating to wheel layout realtionships and table layout relationships.
In these inside table numbers, or groups of numbers are used, and this is what CEH referred to.
I personally find the outside table bets much more difficult or slippery but I think if you refer to the work of Gizmotron in roulette/ baccarat, he has ways of reading states/modes, trends and patterns while yet dealing with fewer variables than what I use which is minimum four. I use cluster analysis working in short cycle 'pairs'.
The 'Pairs' phenomena referred to by Simon is a bet within a bet, has no relation to my bet, and as usual appears to end in a fruitless cul-de-sac of binomial threads with no net gain or progress, but I will re-visit more fully in January.
I have a new idea for professional game strategy which is the Big Bet.
. This involves fast high value unit play when all the signs are green
to indicate a very likely win, say at least 2 out of 4 set criteria give the signal to attack - sometimes more rarely you can get 3 out of 4 are green signals. Then you strike hard and fast then get out and take profit.
I will write more fully on this soon.