+ Register

[RouletteGhost]

Idea, preliminary phase. A 50/50 game, based on "luck"

I like the challenge


It is flat betting. it is a 12 wide "matrix"

I tested 4 cards that Adulay has uploaded here to this site with success.


Card 1 - broken even
Card 2- +2 units
Card 3- +4 units
Card 4- +6 units

What we do: write the decisions as they show from left to right in rows of 12.
Then when you get to the next row bet the opposite of above. It is slow, but breaking even to winning a few units per shoe with no progression seems appealing to me.

Example:



The wins are green the losses are red

More testing required. This is in preliminary phase.

maybe gr8 progression?
11111
22222
33333
44444
55555

Test with me

[RouletteGhost]

I don't know how you guys play here

you guys don't really share your "strategies"

but if you flat bet this is as good as any other id presume

[AsymBacGuy]

I'm just asking you: is there a particular reason to split the outcomes in rows of 12?

as.

[RouletteGhost]

no, lol.

just trying to find a clever way to flat bet

[AsymBacGuy]

no, lol.

just trying to find a clever way to flat bet

Ok.

Have you noticed the vertical outcomes registered below each of the twelve letters?

as.

[RouletteGhost]

Ok.

Have you noticed the vertical outcomes registered below each of the twelve letters?

as.

elaborate

Rich

[soxfan]

no, lol.

just trying to find a clever way to flat bet

Betting flat don't feed the bulldog, hey hey!

[RouletteGhost]

will test this more

if i can flat bet $25 green chips and win a few units an hour im a happy guy

also, time will tell if a progression is safe with this 12 wide scheme. betting a progression on B only, for example you will lose big, but 12 decisions back may be another story

[AsymBacGuy]

elaborate

Rich

Think about 12 different players each placed below the 12 letters.
So after your 36 resolved bets (ties ignored) each player got three BP results.

Let's say every player wants to win 3 hands in a row or NOT losing three hands in a row with no particular strategy other than choosing at the start the same side of betting.

as.     

[RouletteGhost]

im not the best at pulling things apart, just say what you are trying to say

(its me not you)

[RouletteGhost]

what i like about this 12 wide scheme and betting against above is that i don't see losing large sums of money

[RouletteGhost]

4 different cards of decisions

all flat bet

none ended in negative balance, either broken even or in the PLUS

further investigation NEEDED

[AsymBacGuy]

what i like about this 12 wide scheme and betting against above is that i don't see losing large sums of money

Well, I don't want to discourage you, but if you test more shoes you'll see that you won't get any edge by utilizing this BS.
Your losing patterns will show up whenever the 1-13-25.., 2-14-26..., 3-15-27... etc positional hands will be of the same nature (B or P) and sooner or later they will.

Imo you better consider the whole picture even taking into account the use of a short progression.

as.

[Garfield]

Yeah, why 12 ? I even have an idea to "randomize" the row's amount. I.e first row 12, second row 7, 3rd is 6' then 12 and so on.

Maybe will work better? Dunno

[RouletteGhost]

A 50 50 game

Only thing i could think of is a unique way to bet