+ Register

[Bally6354]

I am going to post 5 shoes a day from the BB2 Simulator. These are not RNG, but shuffled cards. (6 decks)

Shoe 1:
[attachimg=1]

Shoe 2:
[attachimg=2]

Shoe 3:
[attachimg=3]

Shoe 4:
[attachimg=4]

Shoe 5:
[attachimg=5]

cheers

[Bally6354]

My results for a purely mechanical random strategy I am testing at the moment are as follows from the 5 shoes above.

Shoe 1: +8
Shoe 2: +6
Shoe 3: +12
Shoe 4: +4
Shoe 5: -5

It uses a 124 positive progression. I will share it if it stays in profit over 100 shoes winning more than 50% of the shoes.

cheers

[Patience777]

Banker is in green I assume?

[ADulay]

Flat betting VDW/2 shows:

#1 +0
#2 +6
#3 +2
#4 +8
#5 +12

Obviously there are many ways to play but this is the current play.

Post up your own honest results to see what may be working!

AD (or sit there like a slug and eat Cheetos

[Bally6354]

Thanks ADulay for joining in.

Patience, Yes, your correct.

[Sputnik]

Bally that is very cool and i read you use positiv progression, that is twice as hard then flatbetting wish i assume Adulay did with VDM ...

CHeers

[Bally6354]

Hello Sputnik, I wouldn't normally toy around with random mechanical ideas anymore, however I still had a few ideas floating around the old brain and so I am giving them a test. I am a VDW advocate myself and ADulay's results could blow mine away over 100 shoes, but we will see. I like the positive progressions. I seem to remember in the 'Koetsch' book 'Conquering the Casino's' that a 124 geometric bet performed better than flat betting regarding peak gains over 100 rounds. I will need to look back into all that and see how it all works with VDW.

Anyway, here are todays 5 shoes.

Shoe 6:
[attachimg=1]

Shoe 7:
[attachimg=2]

Shoe 8:
[attachimg=3]

Shoe 9:
[attachimg=4]

Shoe 10:
[attachimg=5]

cheers

[Bally6354]

Shoe 6: +27
Shoe 7: -14
Shoe 8: -14
Shoe 9: +19
Shoe 10: -12

Total from 10 Shoes +31.

It just shows how random works. Looking at yesterdays 5 shoes and todays, you would think there were two completely different systems.

cheers

[johnnycs1]

Flat betting VDW/2 shows:

#1 +0
#2 +6
#3 +2
#4 +8
#5 +12

Obviously there are many ways to play but this is the current play.

Post up your own honest results to see what may be working!

AD (or sit there like a slug and eat Cheetos

ADULAY....

I CAN'T RECALL WHAT .." VDW/2 " IS ?? .....OR IF I EVEN KNEW WHAT IT WAS ?? 

COULD YOU PLEASE ...OR SOMEONE PLEASE REFRESH MY MEMORY ? 

Thank ya very much !!

[Sputnik]

'Conquering the Casino's' that a 124 geometric bet performed better than flat betting regarding peak gains over 100 rounds.

Bally i hate it when you mention the book, i don't want anyone to read it or buy it, i just want everyone forget about the book so i can keep the testing results and material for my self :-)
After reading his book my understanding and knowledge took a different level of understanding. I also react after reading that some positiv progressions was better then flatbetting.

Now i do exactly the same test process as he did - but i get a hint after 10 x 100 placed bets and look at all different peaks and reversals.
The most important factor is to key when and where during does samples you are ahead. So real statistics show when to quit based upon logical facts. Great feeling.

Cheers

[ADulay]

Second batch under VDW/2 Flat:

#1 -3
#2 -4
#3 +8
#4 +0
#5 +5

[Sputnik]

Bally i don't understand how you and Adulay present our results.

- do you play one shoe and at the end of the shoe you look at the net profit or loss

- do you play one shoe and use win targets and stop loss

- do you play one shoe and show the peak results of winnings or loses during the play

Cheers

[Bally6354]

Hello Sputnik,

Mine is just the results at the end of the shoe. I don't have any stop wins / losses. There are just two triggers that I wait for.

cheers

[james]

johnnycs1,

Bet selection VDW is discussed in this thread.

http://betselection.cc/roulette-forum/use-math-to-beat-roulettebaccarat/

[johnnycs1]

johnnycs1,

Bet selection VDW is discussed in this thread.

http://betselection.cc/roulette-forum/use-math-to-beat-roulettebaccarat/

THANKS JAMES .....KIND OF YOU TO ANSWER MY QUESTION !!

LOOKS LIKE A LOT OF INFO TO CONSIDER !!

I only read the first page out of something like 22 pages and will read thru it ASAP .

In the meantime , does anyone know , if it is a viable method to use ? what's the general feeling ?

Thanks Again James !! Have a Great Weekend !!