The control of variance is impossible

If you can do it,you'll ll be next math Nobel Prize

If your method can reduce or cancel variance,flat bet is enough for winning,but progressions speed up your success

Yes, controlling variance is impossible, because it is independent RANDOM, zero correlation. But that doesn't stop us from seeking options to which best achieve this.

My "maths approach to Baccarat", goes someway to achieving this, a repeating 1/128 chance cost you 3 losing bets providing

you did not too move early, a worst case scenario, which will happen once you play, 200~300 shoes will cost you 6 LIAR, which then leads to, "how much did that freak shoe" cost you? Which obviously is entirely dependant on the MM approach you decided to employ.

Flat betting is not enough, I would be extremely happy with

**any** method that gave me.

LLW LLW LLW LLW LLW LLW LLW LLW etc a 33% win rate.

I would take that all day any day, if it was guaranteed. Which it can't be, so we settle for the next best option!!!!!

*Alternatively I could invent \ pluck out of thin air, claim a 65% strike / hit rate. so that you, hit me with 100's of questions which I will skirt around, eventually hoping that you will collapse in awe out of total adulation, in the vain hope I throw you a crumb of the lie.*