+ Register

[alrelax]

Correlation between good/great comradeship and above average wagering/wins/great sessions?

I strongly believe it does, so IMO and also by my B&M Casino experience. 

Can we all name some of ours.  Would love for some participation with first time posters.  (We do have countless real (non robot) viewers and members with zero posts, etc.

Remember, if you sign up fresh and post, the first 3 or so posts must be approved prior to appearing.  I did this this to trim away the sign up and start slamming us with paid to click on links and systems, etc., etc. 

[alrelax]

Back in 2019, over 5 years ago I wrote most of the following below reference camaraderie as well as adversity at tables while playing.

I have written about emotions and comradeship, winning no matter what the person wagers on, losing no matter what the person wagers on, etc.  It all affects the atmosphere of most if not all of those sitting at the table.  If you say it doesn't, I have a very hard time to seriously believe you.

No matter what anyone says, a table full of screaming people winning stacks of chips equivalent to most any ones weekly pay check or take from a business within 30 to 90 seconds at a clip, is powerful.  Very powerful both consciously as well as subconsciously.  That is a given.  Coupled with occurring hand after hand after hand, can and does easily change the way most think at a live gaming table. 

Like wise, the complete opposite is 100% true.  Losing.  Extremely powerful as well,  Although a miserable aura and heart wrenching feelings abound, especially when you know the people or have played with them for some time, even more influential and powerful than the winning correlation I described above.   

There are players at a table that will very obviously wager very clearly opposite of what some are doing and there are other players that will also wager with those, especially the larger wagering bets being made.  Both have an effect on many people, maybe not all, but most.  I generally do not wager against people, I have if I see something else that leads me that way, but rarely have I for just that sole reason.  On the other hand, I have solely wagered with other players, which I call getting sucked in, for the sole reason of their wager.  Seldom it is a small wager or just asking someone what side to wager on, etc. 

Many things at the bac table as I have mentioned in my long rants and threads, etc., have pointed these things out.  Yes, there are many side-ways things that come into play for various reasons I believe we all have, no matter if that is columns, roads, guessing, past experiences, superstitions, things other players are saying and doing, etc. 

Can a person looking for a happy/joyous table with a certain caliber of winning player or even a losing one with the player destined to lose, and place your larger wager accordingly always maintain their winnings and consistently rely on that as the sole source of their betting reason(s)?  A few wagers, quick and simple is much greater with winning results, than extended long runs of those types.  A nice possible protocol?  Possibly at times and most certainly not at others.

Can that be replicated into its own game plan and schedule for others to count on?  But do it too much and the tables turn, which they always will in the game of bac.  Always, always, always. 

Brings one player to mind I watched for years.  Always came with the same amount of money.  $600.00.  Always bought in for $300.00 once or twice.  Once if he won and twice if he lost.  His wagers were always the same.  I can not tell you why he wagered on what he did, he never spoke to anyone.  But it was clear what he was doing.  He was betting on the opposite side when everyone was all heavy wagering on one side, but never the first time the table wagered on that one side after the guy got there and bought in. He would put the $300.00 on the opposite side and if won he would do it one additional time with a full parlay.  His goal was to wager to win $900.00.  He never played more than the $600.00 once a week and he almost never played past obtaining $900.00 if he won.  I might have seen him wager once more on rare occasion.  I just remember this player now because he followed strong, strict and a religious scheduling trigger.

I see many wager small amounts as well as much larger amounts with that purpose.  I have just never seen anyone that decisively doing it without wagering anything else or playing a longer time, with the exception of that one person.   

Fact is, anything is possible and anything can win in Bac for a few hands, possible within a 'section' of a shoe, much greater than it will if wagered shoe after shoe after shoe wagering the majority of the 80 hands in each shoe.