BUT DOES IT WORK?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=re3BBJ3GOB4
Did that cat used to post on the wizard forum, hey hey?
No it was stupid. They took a shine to Vermanti because he posted himself on the web, so got a sympathy pass, otherwise he would have received the gr8 treatment, a fickle moral bunch at WoV.
And then you got this oriental baccarats master cat. It is a serious thing and getting so you can't tell the player without a scorecard, hey hey.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOgi0IJOxIk
Somebody has to tell the guy in the first video that, depending on the shoe, 75% to 95% of the results in a shoe are runs of 3 or less of banker or players........which is why bac is so hard to beat.
And somebody has to tell the guy in the second video. that losing 9 bets in a row is fairly common, regardless of what you may read in any bac forum.
Simpleton territory, what's with the opposing bet?? He could of bet the difference.
[smiley]giga/dingue.gif[/smiley]
5 winning shoes out of 20? What's a winning shoe, just a shoe where he hits a few runs of 4 and 5? that overcome his losses on the 1's and 2's? What's his starting bankroll? The 20u he has displayed in green? surely not. Does he only bet on P runs? What about all the lost units in commission on a failed progression on Banker? How does switching shoes make a difference?
I can see why he got laughed off a forum. This is absolute rubbish. The whole presentation is a mess. Why are there dice in the frame? What's with switching to white chips in the middle of his illustration? Why does he have three separate betting places for B and P on his cardboard for a two man team approach? Why is he stacking chips on his losing bet instead of raking it off like he is supposed to? How could he have been winning with this method for months and still need to check his notes on how much to bet on each hand? How did he not realize the opposing bet does nothing?
Ima say no, the method does not work. Two reasons. 1. No mechanical method works, the stop loss after 20 decisions isn't making a difference. 2. I just glanced through some of my bac cards, and even though some of them open up heavy FLD, most of the runs are 3 and 4 with a spattering of 5's. Profitable, but not the 40u this guys is talking about. A couple have streaks 6 or 8 early in the shoe, but they are surrounded by several singles and doubles, making the long run a recoup of lost units more than a gain of profit. And the rest of the shoes are just straight up an accumulation of losses in the first 20 hands.
HBS
I've watched this on You Tube before and know it's not going to work in the long run
against a balanced set of games which will be the majority.
Even my best bet selection method will struggle with a balanced game selections, and only win .6 units before commission over 12 games, with per game
unit swing negatives to positives. This swing can work on my short term physic during long play periods and leave me with a feeling of burn out.
I'm practicing Blackjack once again. A new casino will open 15 miles near me and only carry BJ and couple other games with slots.
Does anyone know and use a method other than hi-lo that will be beneficial ? You may pm me, thanks.
Quote from: RichBailey86 on September 04, 2015, 10:28:30 PM
BUT DOES IT WORK?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=re3BBJ3GOB4
Anyone can sit at a fake table and map out hand decisions that win. After you play in a casino for a period of time, you will observe and experience it does not happen like that.
Vermanti a big fan of GR8 apparently. Peas in the same pod.
Uh-oh, careful Johno/RolexWatch...you've posted twice in this thread and mentioned my name in both of them....obsessed about me much? The problem is that you tend to get cranky when you get obsessed with me, so be careful.
obsessed?
[smiley]toto/d200712191819008846.gif[/smiley]
Another example of Baccarat turning otherwise (usually) normal people stupid without them realizing.