Poker News:
Court Opinion Split on Phil Ivey's $9.6M Baccarat Win
https://www.pokernews.com/news/2016/10/court-opinion-split-on-phil-ivey-9.6m-baccarat-win-26141.htm?utm_content=buffer893df&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer
Why the same cards were used and the dealer was allowed to arrange them just so post play is beyond explanation.
Card Player:
Poker Legend Phil Ivey Ordered To Pay Borgata $10M
Federal Judge Rules Ivey, Playing Partner Owe Millions
by Brian Pempus | Published: Dec 19, 2016
http://www.cardplayer.com/poker-news/21132-poker-legend-phil-ivey-ordered-to-pay-borgata-10m
Thanks for the update 21 Aces, to beat the house even in the court of law seems to be an up hill climb.
Wewin2222
In short, they proposed heavily rigged advantaged play and both casinos obliged. Why? There is no explanation. In my view, they proposed cheating and the arrangement was agreed to.
I would like to play with him in a fair game to see what his true skills are.
Daamit, i was rooting for ivey.
I wasn't at all. The win was worth more than his name. Very clever.