+ Register

[iplayforaliving]

Well replied.

It's always best to refuse to bite back when someone tries to provoke a reaction.

The poor dears soon lose interest.

Thank you for your kind words, esoito.


You know me man. I'm always game on! 

[Rolex-Watch]

But if you don't have any evidence of me being a scam-artist then, it's time to shut up.


My name is Alvin Tuarez and you can google search me so you can check if I have anomalous transactions in the past.

I just did, all I got was links to your site and here, proves nothing. 

At least I have the guts to say my name publicly and not hide under my pseudonym?

Again proves nothing.

They are educated people BUT please don't call them suckers as what you did on my other post.

they are the latter, casinos are full of suckers, literally.  So why go to the trouble of creating a web-site to reel them in, when they are ripe for the picking all around you?  Maybe they might want to see a demonstration for themselves first, perhaps they know you, best avoiding face to face contact when your not genuine and can't deliver. 

You remind me of  somebody on the old Baccaratforums site, he also created a slick looking web-site expecting to reel them in.  Anyway you're a top notch winner, have random outcomes all figured out, right?  You don't need people's money when you can make as much as you like from the Baccarat tables, so why charge anything for mentoring, why take on something that you can't possibly control.  Nobody can play like anybody else because simply they are not them, we all react differently at the tables to wins, losses and placing of chips.   Why would any successful player want the hassle of somebody coming back and saying "it doesn't work", I would have thought your precious time would be better spent taking chips from the casinos than mentoring, no hassles, no headaches  and for what, the cost of less than half of your unit value. 

Consistent winners get sick of people asking "how's it going today", "are you winning today", get sick of being noticed day in and day out, the last thing any consistant winner wants, is to start taking on students via the internet, they would rather keep their head down and take their daily wedge from the casino coffers and move on.   Of course your tale doesn't add up in any shape or form and I suggest you get busy creating some new bogus ID's who can then thank you for your tuition.

There is absolutely nothing that you can do which hasn't been seen before across the internet by people who have lost so much through gambling, that they lose their moral compass and will resort to any means to recreate a bankroll so they can have another go. 

iPlayForALiving
"Make Money Anytime, Anywhere!"

Yet shall gladly accept you paying me $45 for a staking plan which you can run at your own risk against a series of coin flips.

[RouletteKEY]

[Wally Gator]

iplayforaliving  looks like he is fishing for buyers to me.
Doesn't look like this to you esoito?
The forum rules say:
"Since this is a space for posting and analyzing bets for making conclusions: No bloviating, no hinting-only".
Coming here and bragging about beating a game of chance without offering the method, is bad taste at least. If you don't want to describe your method fine, but do not brag or hint about being a winner so much - what's the use of this?

Well the use is to attract buyers let me tell you.

BINGO !!! Well said, Kav.  It's interesting that Esoito deleted a post of mine in support of this guy.  Not sure what's going on with that.  I guess the rules are only good for certain folks, which is why so many have left this forum.

[RouletteKEY]

I'm with Nathan Detroit's line of thinking here until further evidence arises one way or the other...so far the math just isn't adding up

[esoito]

Here's a suggestion to try to lay to rest all the negative comments that are based on opinions and not evidence.

Iplayforaliving could offer a free membership to Adulay who, as we all know, is not only a moderator but is also a very experienced baccarat player.

If Adulay agrees, then we can all be guided by Adulay's report to us, which will be based on facts and not on baseless conjecture and guesses that proliferate at the moment.

[Mike]

Hey that's not a bad idea esoito!

10-1 he won't take you up on it though. 

[Mike]

If you have cold, hard evidence the poster is a scammer then kindly post it.

And what would that consist of, exactly? It's pretty hard to prove that someone is a scammer. If a few members came forward and said they were ripped off by this guy, would that do? That's hardly likely to happen is it?  These people would be too embarrassed and ashamed to come forward.

In a court of law, you're usually assumed innocent until proven guilty, but in this case, given that no winning system at baccarat is mathematically possible, the casinos are still open for business, every system touted as winner has been proved a failure, then you should be assumed guilty until proved innocent.

[NathanDetroit]

I  simple rule of the thumb: If it waddles like a  duck and it quacks like  a duck then it is a duck. Easy way to sniff out scammers .


Without attention they will waddle away.

[Pink Floyd 25]

I bought the system so I will give you an honest report in the near future.I've been around the block so I expect this to fail like every other method but I will give this a real shot at working.

[esoito]

I bought the system so I will give you an honest report in the near future.I've been around the block so I expect this to fail like every other method but I will give this a real shot at working.

Welcome to the forum!

I, and others too I expect, will be most interested in what you have to tell us.

Trouble is, I can already imagine some responses along the lines of "how do we know this person is truly independent and is not actually the system-seller under another name?"

A fair question is it not?

[Pink Floyd 25]

Esoito,
          you ask fair questions & I think your impression of me could go along way here. If you can contact me privately perhaps we can have a phone conversation. That should give you a better idea about my character.
         

[esoito]

Well done. A positive offer.  But I'm not sure I have the skills to accurately discern anybody's character over the phone!

However, I'm generally not far off the mark in analysing their writing, as I've had training in that discipline.

But your offer does at least show that you've tried to be upfront and open, so thank you for making the effort.

I think that for now we'll just patiently wait to see what you have to say about your purchase, and take it from there.

So. Over to you when you're ready...No rush.

[joeystyle]

Baccarat is such a delicious and frustrating game. Going mano a mano vs a Casino is the ultimate for me. I hold my own against them, but not by much. In comparison to others, my results aren't so bad. I admire persons who develop methodologies that result in positive results for themselves. Is there anything wrong with these persons trying to market these same skills to others? We are all adults here. So, it our own choice whether to take them up on their offer. If it works out for a person, great! If not, are you any worse off than before trying the numerous others system you purchased ?

Hope anyone who has been mentored by Alvin has been successful. As well as anyone who has purchased other "systems" in the market place.

Wish negative people would stop the bashing. It can come from a place within them that either they are frustrated that what they have been trying isn't working. Or, they are jealous that a person has come up with a way to beat a casino (temporarily), and is showing others to do the same.

Joey

[esoito]

Well, it's 5 months later and no review yet from Pink Floyd.

And it's interesting to note iplayforaliving suddenly disappeared from the forum without any explanation.

Perhaps they were both wings of the same bird.

Or perhaps nobody wanted to spend $540 on so-called tuition!

For one who claimed to be so expert at baccarat Google threw up less than 10 hits on his name.

It always gets back to caveat emptor, caveat lector.