Hello everyone,


Thought I'd bring this over here as it is still holding up nicely. Here are the rules and as ever, all questions, testing and criticisms are most welcome!


First I will highlight with numbers.


Our trigger to bet is when any two consecutive spins have 2 and only 2 matching EC. Doesn't matter which EC


So:


Wait for any spin to occur




29   or in other words Black, High, Odd or in other words BHO


20   Ah ha! A trigger because 29 and 20 have 2 matching ECs, the High and the Black.


Here is another example:


14 RLE


12  This is not a trigger because they have 3 matching ECs


30  This is a trigger because they have RED and EVEN


I hope you understand the trigger.


Now the bet is to attack the two opposite EC than the two trigger ECs.


Confused?


Here's an example using the above numbers


12


30  Trigger. Now bet BLACK and ODD


That is it!!


Use mild progression if you please or short marty 1,2,4 or try flat bet.

6
13 trigger bet HR
25 WIN +2
18
18
0
3
17 trigger bet HE
19 DRAW +2
19
0
30
3
26
33 trigger bet LR
36 DRAW +2
35
11 trigger bet RE
15 LOSS 0
36
7
35
29
0
31
36
10
29
15 trigger bet RE
29 LOSS -2
17

I'll accept that small loss there and into the next!

34
14
36 -2
6
17
12 -2
28
29
12 0
30
10
25
1   
30 0
31
21
18 +2
1
23
28 +4
3
35
1
35
30
19
15 +6
9
28
18
18
23
30
10 +8
18
30
9   +8
21
17
25
24
31
18  +10
29
2
32
13
23
36
26  +10
11
33
22  +10
32
5
16
20  +12
16
36
22  +12
1
9
19
8    +14
9
20
23
21
25
19
19
18
36
21  +14
32
34
31
32
17
18
19
36
1    +14
35
31
33
21
12  +16
6
20
4    +14
15
1
19  +14
5
27
13  +14
31
3
27
33  +14
4
10
19
24
7
17
12  +14
10
2
7
3
8
27
32
26  +14

Thanks for bringing it here mate! 

That's 2 out of 3 easy EC

A "double-advantage" one as Sam would put it.

My pleasure Vic,

Note the consistency here....therefore Discipline and Patience are key as ND has said


4
32
13
33
11  -2
13
27
27
23
31
17  -2
26
10
23  0
19
1
22  +2
21
28
13
35
30  +4
8
8
33
20
28  +2
3
30
21
24  +2
29
8
36
1
25
14  +2
24
1
28
32
29  +2
31
33
22
33  0
29
8
26
15  0
26
33
17  0
12
34
27  0
27
23
6   
28
20  -2
15
8
23  0
33
1
1
16
31  +2
34
5
21
21  0
19
8
16
29  +2
14
36
33  +4
11
32
6
18
12  +2
26
1
4
30
8
10
15
30  +4
17
19
17
1
27 +4
2
2
34
13
5
29  +4
9
30
31
18
7
13
10  +4
8
14
22  +4
19
12
20
26
5
17
7   +2
5
9
21
2   +2
32
3
23
21  0

I enjoyed testing your great concept on the "other" forum Bwiz.

Glad you bothered to "transfer" it to this safe haven.

Will reserect the old test-sheets and give it another go,with a view to playing Live at the start of the New Year.

Question...looking back at your sessions,were you always in + at some point,or not ?

Regards.

Dino.

Hi Dino,


All but one I got to +1 and above. The other hovered at -10 before attempting a comeback but I left it in the cheap minus.
That's the beauty, you can leave it with a small loss, knowing next time you can recoup it as there isn't a huge progression to claw back.


Continuing from where I left off:


30
15 +2
16
12
14
22
9
1
11
31 +2
4
13
26 +2
24
36
16 +2
16
5
29 +4
36
30
4
35
8
4
27
31
16 +6
6
11
23 +8
19
1
36 +8
25
10
3
13
6   +8
4
35
4
16
25 +10
3
33
21
4   +12
4
32
20
9   +14
33
21
7   +14
36
28
29 +14
36
24
12 +14
35
34
35
8
25
21
18
34
12 +12
5
5
9
18
3   +10
7
35
31
20
32 +10
8
8
5
30
11
23
25
3
7   +8
36
9
18
20  +10
9
1
12
35  +12
5
16
32  +12
25
28
3
24
7
9
7
27
8   +14
15
19
13
19
18
21
1
36  +14
34
29
27
2   +16
16
36
15  +18
23
31
11  +18
26
5
11
18  +18
1
17
7   +16
6
11
5   +16
12
10
16  +14
10
5
8
15
32  +16
24
10
4   +14
2
36
7
31
18
34
28  +14
17
15
30
31
5
5   +12

quick test, 80 spins ended +8 flatebetting
not bad at all
do you think a small progression would help?
don't think we will see many -2 in a row here
or -2,0,0,-2,0,-2,0 or something like that?

cheap-minus....i like that !! real money speak.

Interesting debate with all this,should it be filed under H+R,continuos or both.

Good question Soggett.

Seen many 2 losers in row Bwiz ?

A few - I'm always wary of introducing progression to it for obvious reasons - only problem is, you could start after a -2, but then draw level with a couple of 0's, and then encounter another -2 etc as soggett says. It is a slow and cautious method, but by all means maybe a mild level up would be a positive tweak.

Hey Bwiz,if you have a method that Flat bets,that's good enough for me.

There was another concept by Maui 13 on the "other" forum that had a very good strike-rate on the first step of the progression that could be flat betted like your method.

There could be a future with these type of methods.

To be continued.....

Quote from: dino246 on December 20, 2012, 08:30:54 PM
Hey Bwiz,if you have a method that Flat bets,that's good enough for me.

There was another concept by Maui 13 on the "other" forum that had a very good strike-rate on the first step of the progression that could be flat betted like your method.

There could be a future with these type of methods.

To be continued.....

I see, well it's definitely worth looking into

I used to play this both ways at once. . However I would  use all three the same or all 3 opposite. Less bets,but did quite well at it,flat betting.

Tough session


9
18
3   -2
7
35
31
20
32 -2
8
8
5
30
11
23
25
3
7   -4
36
9
18
20  -2
9
1
12
35  0
5
16
32  0
25
28
3
24
7
9
7
27
8   +2
15
19
13
19
18
21
1
36 +2
34
29
27
2   +4
16
36
15  +6
23
31
11  +6
26
5
11
18  +6
1
17
7   +4
6
11
5   +4
12
10
16  +2
10
5
8
15
32  +4
24
10
4    +2
2
36
7
31
18
34
28  +2
17
15
30
31
5
5   0
26
11
10
4   -2
16
34
26  -2
14
13
13
1
3    -4
9
3
27
24  -2
10
32
11
29
5   -2
26
12
9
12  -4
27
10
34
31
19
1   -4
36
13
33
22 -4
5
7
12
18 -6
36
16
20 -6
33
27
22 -6
6
9
3
21
3   -8
29
4
24
6   -10
5
20
30
4   -10
6
31
23
12 -8
6
9
15
14 -8
34
11
21
8
8
5
17
12 -8
10
19
9
5   -10
23
30
10 -8
30
17
34
33
26
28 -10
18
21
21
22
3
34
12
10  -10
33
18
9
3
17
35  -10
35
19
3   -10
36
25
16 -10
11
30
25
1  -10
10
28
2   -12
4
27
33
35 -14
12
24
2
30 -14
15
27
25
32
26 -14
18
32
16 -16
32
14
17 -14
33
2
6
7
9
4
7
7
15
11 -16