Here's what I think should be the first 15 hands in shoe #1 of Zumma 600:

B,B,B,B,P,B,B,B,P,P,P,P,P,P,P


can you confirm?

Bayes

I'm not over the headache, but I'll do it!!   

This is the 1,000 tester, mind you.

Shoe 1 and spin 1 on down

PPP
BB
PPP
B
PP
B
P
BB
P
BBBBBBB

I did not know there was a 600; I have the 1,000

I did check the sheet Izak attached and he is using the correct shoes. 

Sam

Thanks, they check out ok. 

OK, made a few errors in calculations.  Figured the draw down from the highest point to the lowest point.  The draw down is now the depth into your bankroll.

Shoe 649 had a profit of 21 units with a draw down of 02 units with the largest bet being 04 units.
Shoe 561 had a profit of 18 units with a draw down of 03 units with the largest bet being 07 units.
Shoe 894 had a profit of 15 units with a draw down of 19 units with the largest bet being 19 units.
Shoe 673 had a profit of 14 units with a draw down of 01 units with the largest bet being 14 units.

Shoe 649 had a profit of 21 units with a draw down of 02 units with the largest bet being 04 units.
Shoe 561 had a profit of 18 units with a draw down of 03 units with the largest bet being 07 units.
Shoe 894 had a profit of 15 units with a draw down of 19 units with the largest bet being 19 units.
Shoe 673 had a profit of 14 units with a draw down of 01 units with the largest bet being 14 units.
Shoe 884 had a profit of 16 units with a draw down of 00 units with the largest bet being 05 units.

Shoe 649 had a profit of 21 units with a draw down of 02 units with the largest bet being 04 units.
Shoe 561 had a profit of 18 units with a draw down of 03 units with the largest bet being 07 units.
Shoe 894 had a profit of 15 units with a draw down of 19 units with the largest bet being 19 units.
Shoe 673 had a profit of 14 units with a draw down of 01 units with the largest bet being 14 units.
Shoe 884 had a profit of 16 units with a draw down of 00 units with the largest bet being 05 units.
Shoe 657 had a  loss  of 03 units with a draw down of 37 units with the largest bet being 39 units.

Shoe 649 had a profit of 21 units with a draw down of 02 units with the largest bet being 04 units.
Shoe 561 had a profit of 18 units with a draw down of 03 units with the largest bet being 07 units.
Shoe 894 had a profit of 15 units with a draw down of 19 units with the largest bet being 19 units.
Shoe 673 had a profit of 14 units with a draw down of 01 units with the largest bet being 14 units.
Shoe 884 had a profit of 16 units with a draw down of 00 units with the largest bet being 05 units.
Shoe 657 had a  loss  of 03 units with a draw down of 37 units with the largest bet being 39 units.
Shoe 652 had a  loss  of 41 units with a draw down of 41 units with the largest bet being 49 units.
 

Shoe 649 had a profit of 21 units with a draw down of 02 units with the largest bet being 04 units.
Shoe 561 had a profit of 18 units with a draw down of 03 units with the largest bet being 07 units.
Shoe 894 had a profit of 15 units with a draw down of 19 units with the largest bet being 19 units.
Shoe 673 had a profit of 14 units with a draw down of 01 units with the largest bet being 14 units.
Shoe 884 had a profit of 16 units with a draw down of 00 units with the largest bet being 05 units.
Shoe 657 had a  loss  of 03 units with a draw down of 37 units with the largest bet being 39 units.
Shoe 652 had a  loss  of 41 units with a draw down of 41 units with the largest bet being 49 units.
Shoe 931 had a  loss  of 52 units with a draw down of 52 units with the largest bet being 32 units.

Two more shoes to pull Izak's fat out of the fire!!

Shoe 649 had a profit of 21 units with a draw down of 02 units with the largest bet being 04 units.
Shoe 561 had a profit of 18 units with a draw down of 03 units with the largest bet being 07 units.
Shoe 894 had a profit of 15 units with a draw down of 19 units with the largest bet being 19 units.
Shoe 673 had a profit of 14 units with a draw down of 01 units with the largest bet being 14 units.
Shoe 884 had a profit of 16 units with a draw down of 00 units with the largest bet being 05 units.
Shoe 657 had a  loss  of 03 units with a draw down of 37 units with the largest bet being 39 units.
Shoe 652 had a  loss  of 41 units with a draw down of 41 units with the largest bet being 49 units.
Shoe 931 had a  loss  of 52 units with a draw down of 52 units with the largest bet being 32 units.
Shoe 592 had a profit of 14 units with a draw down of 39 units with the largest bet being 42 units.

Whoope D Doo...............2 units ahead

Shoe 649 had a profit of 21 units with a draw down of 02 units with the largest bet being 04 units.
Shoe 561 had a profit of 18 units with a draw down of 03 units with the largest bet being 07 units.
Shoe 894 had a profit of 15 units with a draw down of 19 units with the largest bet being 19 units.
Shoe 673 had a profit of 14 units with a draw down of 01 units with the largest bet being 14 units.
Shoe 884 had a profit of 16 units with a draw down of 00 units with the largest bet being 05 units.
Shoe 657 had a  loss  of 03 units with a draw down of 37 units with the largest bet being 39 units.
Shoe 652 had a  loss  of 41 units with a draw down of 41 units with the largest bet being 49 units.
Shoe 931 had a  loss  of 52 units with a draw down of 52 units with the largest bet being 32 units.
Shoe 592 had a profit of 14 units with a draw down of 39 units with the largest bet being 42 units.
Shoe 515 had a loss of 65 units.  Loss for tens shoes = 63 units.

Do i win anything? 

If -63 is the fate of 10 random shoes, it is certain that there is nothing in this system that can ensure win more and lose less. It is nothing else but a fake Holy Grail. Another shill from Izak, as I expected. I am hearing nothing from "the originator", my crisbis, regarding this HG.

Busy on another project. 


Looks like others have it covered anyway.
Its not a "Win all the Time" HG..............
Something very similar has been coded previously too.......... 

Gents

I do realize that 10 shoes is no definative test.  100 shoes would not be either.  This was just a random sample, if Random.Org is random.  LOL

This was a way for me to have a good look at the system and see how it played in comparison to the one I already have.  They are very similar. 

Not wanting to brag on Sam, but I saw at least two ways to greatly improve on this system.  But I wanted to try it "right out of the box" and see what happened.

When people rail so hard against something, I just have to have a look at it. 

The Preacher went to see the movie, "The Life Of Brian" and told us, "I have seen the movie; you don't need to."  I immediately went to see the movie. 

Izak's idea is not all that bad.  Maybe not the "Grail", but not all that bad.

Sam