Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!

How would you become a full time pro ?

Started by Sputnik, March 09, 2013, 01:00:59 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

FLAT_IN_O

Last 9 splits versus further 9 splits.......staying on lasts until change
then continue on furtest.....very simple,chops versus rides,and mostly
rides prevail on flat bet basis.Tested in hundreds of Wiesbaden sessions,
played for real in Wien and Wiesbaden recently with large stakes and been
successful.that's LvF 9.

esoito

[mod] That's enough comments aimed at whoever The Crow is or isn't. He/she has done nothing wrong, or ignored forum rules. He/she now knows to tread carefully and that there are some very astute members of the forum. Sufficient unto the day --- move on. [/mod]

Chrisbis

That Flat In O chap is such a darling ...isn't he!
Its so good to be back..................
:nod:

Sputnik


spike

Quote from: FLAT_IN_O on March 10, 2013, 10:34:58 PM
Last 9 splits versus further 9 splits.......staying on lasts until change
then continue on furtest.....very simple,chops versus rides

what's a further 9 split. What are 'rides'.

The Crow

Random can only be beaten with random selection with a sophisticated money management plan.

LvF 9 is a great example of this approach. Go TCS.

TC. All I'm missing is the S. What a coincidence?

TC

Chrisbis

Stone The Crows.................its getting interesting! S.T.C.

The Crow

S. T. C.

Stop That Chrisbis

Coming from, what a disappointment.

TC

[mod] "Stone the crows" is simply an English expression along the lines of "Goodness me....gor blimey...crikey..." and so on. There was nothing to stop. Chrisbis was NOT being offensive or insulting. It was a neat pun -- a play on words. Good one, CB. [/mod]

Chrisbis

Apologies to the member "The Crow".....I was just playing with words.
No offence intended.
:-[

The Crow

Past numbers and trigger based. My bad. It won't work then.

Sorry TCS. Thanks for pointing that out Marshall.

TC

FLAT_IN_O

Quote from: Marshall Bing Bell on March 11, 2013, 12:50:05 AM
The system is a good attempt to lower variance, and perhaps break even for a while with some up and down fluctuation, but in the end it will lose at the house edge or above, sorry.

It didn't as yet live playing.We play this throughout night session of about 350 spins,
swapping the tables after any plus,therefore its pure RvR approach,as when we hit the
new table, the bet is followed with the last 9 splits from the previous playing table.
Have you ever though of such approach,mr.Marshall?? Try it you may find it very interesting.

TwoCatSam

Marshall

If you read me you will find that I NEVER make definitive statements about roulette.  No Johnlegend statements here.  You will see I use the word "seems" a lot.  I tell folks I have not been up the mountain.  Don't look to me for that which is etched in stone as you won't find it.

How I play the L v F is to put 200 Euro at risk in the bot and set it for 100 E profit.  Am I struggling?  Well, you could say that.  Am I losing?  No.  Not at this writing.  Today I went down to less than 50 Euro and then it turned on me and went up to profit.  Will it always do that?  I wish I knew.  I "think" it will win 100 more than twice the number of times it loses 200.  Time will tell and I will truthfully report on my test thread.

I can tell you this with a certain measure of certainty:  It plays very evenly.  I've been working with this idea/system for months now.  If it had been as bad as some say, I'd have been gone a long time ago.  I have about six new ideas to try with it--ideas of my own that no one told me.  They may work and they may not.

I am confident of one thing:  If I reported that this system won, posted screen shots of the thousands it made and gave exact instructions on how to do it----very few would even listen let alone try it.  So if it's the "Holy Grail", the casinos are still safe.

If it's not, I had a lot of fun.  Hear me now and believe me later--I'm in it for the fun.  If I wanted money I'd go back into business.

TwoCat
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.   ...Will Rogers

FLAT_IN_O

Quote from: Marshall Bing Bell on March 11, 2013, 08:41:43 AM
It didn't as yet live playing.We play this throughout night session of about 350 spins,
swapping the tables after any plus,therefore its pure RvR approach,as when we hit the
new table, the bet is followed with the last 9 splits from the previous playing table.
Have you ever though of such approach,mr.Marshall?? Try it you may find it very interesting.


Yes I have mr. flatman and I take my hat off to you for trying this. Not many would have the guts to carry over the current state of their game to a new table. I have been playing systems that jump tables mid game for a while now. I don't know for sure if it improves thing, but it sure won't hurt over the long run, in my opinion.

Playing lvf9 like this will give you a kind of RvR game as long as you keep winning and table jumping, but there will be times when the game catches up and the RvR will be gone.--True,but the final/monthly,
yearly/score counts.There isn't ever winning method.

Is TCS playing like this online?--I suggest it....he tweaked it some....72/81 I think.I never play on line
as don't believe em.

What about when you go home after a day at the casino, do you come back tomorrow, or next week and start the new session with yesterday's or last week's last 9 splits?... always start new night session,and playing last 9 from previous table,even with smoke and coffee breaks,so it comes
to pure RvR......O yes there is to expect losing sessions.....we shall soon see it with Malta trip.

FLAT_IN_O



I am confident of one thing:  If I reported that this system won, posted screen shots of the thousands it made and gave exact instructions on how to do it----very few would even listen let alone try it.  So if it's the "Holy Grail", the casinos are still safe.



TwoCat



Right on the nail,Sam.