+ Register

[alrelax]

Stop the 'Cut' thinking every bet!  Why not wager with the shoe instead of against it most of the time?  Why believe all the hype and all the stats from computer models and tests that do not prove what will happen when you sit down with real money at a real casino?

This was a super moneymaking shoe for about 3 people at the table, the rest of them lost all their chips, re-buy ins and everything they brought wager for the Banker with negative progressions, etc. 

[attachimg=1]

[alrelax]

And I have repeatedly wrote, that when you see 0-1-2 or even 3 ties well into the shoe, that is a sign so many times that whatever is happening, continues.  Strong P or Strong B or all chop-chop or any other pattern or trend or presentment.  O-1-2 ties is such a predictor (probably wrong word to use but I am trying to describe what actually happens so many times at a real (B&M table)!

[alrelax]

Especially at the beginning. Yet, so many, the majority will continue wagering for the'Cut' to Banker because Banker is drummed into everyone to always be easier or make more wins than the Player, LOL.

[attachimg=1]

[AsymBacGuy]

I agree that riding the positive univocal situations will get the wise player huge profits but how many shoes like the one you've depicted are going to come out on average?

I mean that a betting plan too much oriented to get the unlikely is like playing a kind of lottery.

Of course the answer remains in the middle.

as.

[alrelax]

Most of those shoes I posted are from like 3 sessions of play with 2 or 3 shoes each.  The shoes are there.  At times they are not, at times they most certainly are.  Problem develops as most players will not believe great opportunities or shoes that are extremely strong in whatever, Players repeating, Bankers repeating, all chop, all doubles all 1s and 3s in any Section, etc., etc. 

Everyone expects the equaling out or the catch up on a continous and steady basis.  It comes and as well, it does not. 

So yes, the answer is probably in the middle.  But I still say one has to have an absolute clear mind without desiring or wagering for a scheduled wager on a continous and steady betting cycle of any type. 

[AsymBacGuy]

So yes, the answer is probably in the middle.  But I still say one has to have an absolute clear mind without desiring or wagering for a scheduled wager on a continous and steady betting cycle of any type.

True and that's why I've found very profitable to get rid of some shoes and to play very few hands. It happened too many times I've lost control of the situation.

as.

[alrelax]

True and that's why I've found very profitable to get rid of some shoes and to play very few hands. It happened too many times I've lost control of the situation.

as.

Exactly and most will never understand.  All joking and drama and slang set aside, I do believe I spelled it out in the opening post of the link attached. (?)

https://betselection.cc/baccarat-forum/allocation-decision-making-too-late-that-ridiculous-psychological-cushion/msg65950/#msg65950