Why do many people say the hit and run technique can not be programmed? In the casino you have a hit and walk out the door. When on your computer you have a hit for you to make a pause.

The program can make pauses to miss any number of sets without playing. It simulates not being present in the casino as the game continues. If it is a bot it can surely be made to stop for a few hours betting dummy bets. If it is a test with a file using past numbers then the entire file is to be discarded when you hit to pass to the next file as if it is the next day in the casino again.

If is not too much to ask you can tell me your opinion. I just think it should not be hard to make a program to pause without betting. This simulates the run.

If you tell me there is a difference between leaving the casino through the door as opposed to pause the computer then I have no case.

Thank you.

It is intended for the best method with better chances in agreement with the opinion of the forum. The survey can be done the first week of the following month.

If communal manual testing is promising for the system maybe we can ask a programmer to make an automated software for it.

To expect that each published system is to be programmed is too much to ask. This way forum programmers have easier work. It only takes a moment of their time for the willing group. All voluntarily. Initial efforts made by the people interested in the promising system.

It can be a good way to benefit members here.

It can be a way to work on group testing with several people involved with the same system for publishing their results?

Maybe this month a system. next month another system. Perhaps choice by a poll to see which system promises from those published in the month. We can go see what promising systems are working. I see many systems published and few systems being tested in the forum.

If we assign a calendar month to each promising system at least we can move forward with something by the end of next year. This is an idea which intrigues me. Maybe other people is the same.

Greetings.

You can see the list of dates here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_dates_predicted_for_apocalyptic_events

still under future predictions.

Quote from: Bally6354 on December 20, 2012, 05:23:31 PM
It's well into the 21st down under and they are still all there! 

The end of the world 1999-2000 was GMT time. I have no knowledge of this time.

Another good idea may be stock market investment. It can also be Forex.

Please do not incur in HYIP.

You can not leave blackjack and dice games unmentioned.

http://rouletteforum.cc/index.php

Uncensored.

Why fear? If you have something solid why be afraid of competition. Those forums are not the world of internet. There are plenty of opportunities elsewhere to publish. Email, chat, other forums.

The censorship of words is also very funny. it breaks easily with placing an image.

Simply use www.text2image.com or any other text generator to create a text image. Then upload to any free image server.

http://www4.picturepush.com/photo/a/11676057/220/11676057.jpg

Will they prohibit all free image servers too?

Has anyone withdrawn money from these non-deposit deals?

If so please share.

It is interesting because it would be something like play safely without risk.

If you win you collect but nothing happens if you lose.

Why they do not have more coverage if such a proposition is so interesting for the players?

Google search: no deposit casino bonus

Hello esteemed Ralph.

I see that the bot programs are made ​​in javascript. Any chance of making scripts in another programming language?

I can use a little of Basic256. I do not know how much is it possible to interact ​​bots with limited languages such as basic. Just wondering.

Homepage: www.basic256.org

Thank you for your response.

Is it for developers to post their rates or is for users to publish how much are they willing to pay for a program as well as the features wanted?

Is it for multiple users to collaborate with a payment schedule for a paid program?

What is the purpose?

Thank you.

Quote from: VLS on December 10, 2012, 08:13:46 AM
Creating a full blown long term testing suite with betting bot included is expected to be a VERY TRIVIAL TASK with it.

Sorry. I believe that making robot roulette bot is extensive work. Not to mention that the casinos change regularly. I do not think anyone is going to make a bot without an amount of effort.

I have done a bit of programming and I know for a certain I do not have the skills to create a roulette bot.

I can barely make a simple program in Basic256. Are you saying that there is a way to make a complete bot in Basic256 with ease?

The ideal is a public forum with the camaraderie of a private group.

I was once a member of a private group. Now is closed because it did not not reach anything valuable in several years. Nobody wanted to give money to pay a programmer for systems testing. All you did was talk of a potential system and nothing else.

I put many pdf even with copyright when for a time there was discussion. The group did not have a forum. It was by email so email attachments only.

In the end what remains are comrades. But the real discussion will always be in the community sharing.

I am not interested in joining another private group. I do not know if all but apparently that is the fate of private groups.

THIS is something similar to the system known
as the ' Montant Beige.'

It requires a good large capital, the patience
of Job, and plenty of time at your disposal. If
you have got all three, and wish to make win-
ning a practical certainty, there are not many
better methods than this, and I believe there
are a few persevering mortals who regularly win
their 5 or 6 units a day at it.

It does not really matter very much what you
elect to play it on it is the ' massage ' or
Progression that is the important thing. It can
be played on Red or Black, on the Sequences
or Intermittences, or if you like on the ' Avant
Derniere' which means that you always play
on the colour that came out last but one it is
probably as good as anything else, and the same
may be said of the Wrangler's method.

You play to win your units one by one, each
as a separate and distinct operation, and when-
ever you win one you stow it away in another
pocket as a definite gain.

If you commence losing, you continue to
play flat or level stakes of i unit, until either
you are one to the good, or the Bank has won
5 from you. As soon as this has happened you
begin playing flat stakes of 2 units, crossing out
wins as they occur, and keeping a record of the
losses. Say you start with 3 losses, 2 wins, and
then 4 losses, your score would look like
this --

1 1 1 1 1 1 1

You are now 5 units to the bad, so you
write down --

1 1 1 1 1

and start playing flat stakes of 2 units. Suppose
the game goes as follows --

Win
Lose
Win
Win
Lose

Your score-sheet will appear thus --

1 1 1  1  1  2 2

You continue staking 2, and the
table wins.

Lose
Lose
Win
Lose
Lose
Lose

Starting afresh with the figures re-
maining, viz. i, 2, your score-sheet will
then read like this --

1 2 2 2 2 2 2

You have now lost 5 twos on balance, so you
commence staking 3, and every time you win
you will cross out 2 twos and write down a 1.

N.B. Be sure you do this. If you cross
out a 2 and a i it will alter the whole system,
and make it more dangerous for the player.

The table comes round in your favour, and
gives you --

Win
Win
Win

Starting with your score as follows --

1 2 2 2 2 2

the result after the above coups of 3 have
been played will be as follows --

1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1

Now as all the twos have disappeared, you
drop from a stake of 3 to 2 again, starting as
follows --

1 1

Supposing you get one loss and two wins,
your score will appear --

1 2 2

and you are quits once more you must then
recommence with a stake of 1 unit.

The Bank has won 15 ' coups ' to your 11 ,
and yet you have come out without loss.

This is the merit of the slow and safe Pro-
gression.

How much capital it would be necessary to
have, to make this method nearly infallible, I
am unable to say, but the player who had
2000 units would be in a very strong position.
Remember that all safe systems are necessarily
slow.

Of course, if the table had continued un-
favourable, you would have commenced staking
4 as soon as five threes appeared on your score-
sheet, and you would have lowered your stake
to 3 again as soon as all the threes had been
wiped out.