+ Register

[JohnLegend]

That isn't hit and run. HAR is when you win a unit and find
another table. Playing till the game is over is called 'playing'.

So mr how does someone win a unit before finding the next table? Do you just show up and bet on the first thing that comes in your head? No you have to track your method TO ARRIVE AT THAT BET.

Stop trying to get the upperhand Spike. You cannot. Your complete thought process is like that of the wizard of odds. He is someone with a closed mind who thinks maths explains everything. And you remind me exactly of him.

When I prove my point over the coming months and years. Youll be singing another tune.

[MarignyGrilleau]

Marigny what is GAMBLERS FALLACY?

First of all i don't get the CAPS. I also do not understand why you come up with that question, what's the connection?


wiki
"The Gambler's fallacy, also known as the Monte Carlo fallacy (because its most famous example happened in a Monte Carlo Casino in 1913),[1][2] and also referred to as the fallacy of the maturity of chances, is the belief that if deviations from expected behaviour are observed in repeated independent trials of some random process, future deviations in the opposite direction are then more likely."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambler's_fallacy

[spike]

So mr how does someone win a unit before finding the next table?

You say to win a game takes an average of 62 spins. I
just don't see how switching tables after 62 spins is
hit and run.

[JohnLegend]

First of all i don't get the CAPS. I also do not understand why you come up with that question, what's the connection?


wiki
"The Gambler's fallacy, also known as the Monte Carlo fallacy (because its most famous example happened in a Monte Carlo Casino in 1913),[1][2] and also referred to as the fallacy of the maturity of chances, is the belief that if deviations from expected behaviour are observed in repeated independent trials of some random process, future deviations in the opposite direction are then more likely."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambler's_fallacy

The question is PRICELESS in my situation. My methods are the opposite of gamblers fallacy.

Nearly every method is based on that exact fallacy SOMETHING IS DUE. PATTERN BREAKER isn't. 7 ON 1 isn't. FIVE isn't. In fact they all work because they are saying you are not due. And if you want my stake youve got to do this RIGHT NOW.

When that finally sinks into enough minds. You will know how I Won.

Until then you carry on stuck on the same track of jaded indifference.

[MarignyGrilleau]

The question is PRICELESS in my situation. My methods are the opposite of gamblers fallacy.

Nearly every method is based on that exact fallacy SOMETHING IS DUE. PATTERN BREAKER isn't. 7 ON 1 isn't. FIVE isn't. In fact they all work because they are saying you are not due. And if you want my stake youve got to do this RIGHT NOW.

When that finally sinks into enough minds. You will know how I Won.

Until then you carry on stuck on the same track of jaded indifference.

By now i do not think you will even read an answer. And i just don't have the energy.
Keep going champ!

[JohnLegend]

You say to win a game takes an average of 62 spins. I
just don't see how switching tables after 62 spins is
hit and run.

You don't see anything Spike other than even chances and level stakes. Youve made that quite clear. The deal is ONE GAME and gone. What I will prove is H.A.R as I execute it. Is superior to continuous play.

You stay on the same track too long you will lose.

You keep hopping from track to track. You will miss that loss for longer periods. IF YOUR BET SELECTION is any good to start with.

Lets be clear on that. A poor bet selection is doomed however you play it. And the people who don't see any advantage in H.A.R often are guilty of using very weak methods to begin with.

Its the total package. To succeed in this game. Maybe one day you will find the courage to talk straight and present a clear cut method.

Then people might see you know something, until then you are just a detractor with nothing better.

[spike]

You don't see anything Spike

Yup, I don't see how moving to another table after
62 spins is hit and run. The average table produces
25 spins an hour. A real table, not some online piece
of stuff. 62 spins is 2 and 1/2 hours worth. Its not
hit and run after that long a time, its more like Snooze
and Crawl..

[Ralph]

Yup, I don't see how moving to another table after
62 spins is hit and run. The average table produces
25 spins an hour. A real table, not some online piece
of stuff. 62 spins is 2 and 1/2 hours worth. Its not
hit and run after that long a time, its more like Snooze
and Crawl..

If you track 61 spins and then make one or two bets I  think it can be called  HAR. I do not think you switch table during tracking!

[Drazen]

My methods are the opposite of gamblers fallacy.

John have you been thinking about changing your signature in forum? This sounds much less egoistic, and still explains lots of things about you and your play.

Best

Drazen

[JohnLegend]

Yup, I don't see how moving to another table after
62 spins is hit and run. The average table produces
25 spins an hour. A real table, not some online piece
of stuff. 62 spins is 2 and 1/2 hours worth. Its not
hit and run after that long a time, its more like Snooze
and Crawl..

I play mostly online these days. there's 120 odd spins an hour. I don't wait for-60 odd spins. I play 3--5 methods in a typical session. If the opportunity comes along I take it. there's not always a long wait.

You ought to know that. I have logged in and had a bet waiting for me hundreds of times. I don't labour over it. If I don't get the opportunity in my session I let it go.

I've never waited 100 spins for a game and neverwill. I have PATTERN BREAKER, DIVIDE AND CONQUER, MATRIX VERTICAL 3, TEMPLATE 7, FIVE. New gems CODE 4 HORIZONTAL and CODE V5 and of course 7 ON 1 to keep me busy. there's never a dull moment.

[JohnLegend]

John have you been thinking about changing your signature in forum? This sounds much less egoistic, and still explains lots of things about you and your play.

Best

Drazen

What is my signature?

[MarignyGrilleau]

My methods are the opposite of gamblers fallacy.

You have no idea do you?

[JohnLegend]

You have no idea do you?

Whatever Marigny, losing methods and strategies of play. don't succeed longterm. So you can explain to me how having no idea achieved the things I will.

[Robeenhuut]

John

Any chance of screen capture of betting history of any online casino you play at? 

[Ralph]

John

Any chance of screen capture of betting history of any online casino you play at?

Something to back up the claims should be mandatory.
As this over some time so it will also show the red figures , and not only selected sessions.