Quote from: Sputnik on January 23, 2014, 06:27:20 PM

What do you mean by money management ? for some it means different progressions and for others it means how you handle your money with win targets and loss limits.

All of the above.

Reminds of a joke....


Man says to his mother...


"Mother, Im 56, I've never married, just lived here with you. I've never lived on my own....its time to leave and go and see the big wide world"


Mother says..."arnt you being a bit hasty son, you've always lived with me. You won't survive on your own."


Son says" This is it Mother, its ridiculous, I'm 56. Everyone makes fun of me...still living at home with Mother at 56."


He packs and leaves, shutting the door.


5 mins later he knocks on the door and Mother opens it.


He's stood there with a big graze on his knee and his pants ripped, crying his eyes out.


"Mum....I fell over ", he cries.

 

Very funny thread.  I guess everyone predicted right. 

So this is a HG of all HGs. Right money management. No matter what u bet. Yeah....you can bet the same cold
dozen all the time and with right money management you will be ahead. Our bud Al is a black magician. He already said some time ago that he can multiply money, so he has it in his pocket. With right money management. So it won't fall down from his pockets. Yeah! That's a HG of all HGs. No matter what u bet.
Who said bet selection is important? It doesn't matter!

Quote from: Bayes on January 23, 2014, 11:23:50 AM
What do you want to argue about? You start... 

Kiev....revolution....

Quote from: Albalaha on January 23, 2014, 04:20:56 PM
Love me or hate me but you can not forget me.

Dude!

I thought you had left the building!!!

Did you bring Elvis back with you from the casino?

AD (also, I can't reply over on your own board now)

who will warn me to not play martingale or chase fallacies?

Love me or hate me but you can not forget me.

Who said that??

I would like to see a progression for the even chances Mr Albalaha or at least a hint or clue to point us in the right direction. Were not dogs, you don't have to rub our nose in it

Right direction is  not to believe fairy tales. How many times we heard the same story over and over again?
This HG of HGs is just another modification in long line of HGs, which were even sold by him but did not make anyone happy. Including himself by the way. Otherwise why he is coming back with new exciting stories?
Money management will help to defeat roulette on a long run?

Gimme a break...


he  either lives in a phantasy world or just attracts public attention making up stories. or maybe both.

The only real thing he achieved is that we don't forget him. We do remember him. He is smarter than an  average bear. Draws so much attention. This is a talent. But it has nothing to do with defeating roulette.
Even on short runs. If he were really able to do it, we would not hear from him much, he would be busy traveling  and making money.

You guys do not believe me yet want me to tell about my HG. Why are you so confused?


I give you some hints (earlier also I did but someone starting shouting too much and I stopped)


:
1. Never think of beating any bet in very short span. It is not possible even with a million chips. Like you can think of earning something out of betting a dozen till 200 spins but not in 20-30 spins.


2. Look at number 3 wins/losses. Make a strategy which can survive and win through such dirty stretches of variance and overall bad hit rate. Make yourself prepared to face such situations.


3. Keep a reasonable bankroll. Don't think of beating and cutting through millions of probabilities with 100 chips in hand. That much is sufficient only to try luck.


4. If you can not do anything among these, seriously consider quitting gambling or only go for recreational gambling with spare money.


5. Stop writing silly methods everyday which will, in no way, help anybody to better the game. Great Grand Pa and Pockets claim to win my number 3 challenge. Analyse both of them and see if they really have changed anything that wins or merely reverse engineered the wins/losses in #3 particularly to show a "brute force attack" on it, somehow winning that particular scenario. If any of them can really beat #3, it should beat all other 37 numbers of Zumma book too and if it is true, it is worth following.


6. Superman claimed to have a grail (which he himself seems to be confused about explaining) that has won him a few thousand sessions without a single loss. He is quite a contributor (in his own beliefs) and can get you all out of your miseries. Gizmo did claim similarly and it was quite difficult to explain too (only God knows why) and finally he could be of no help to you towards getting a Grail.
                     The funniest grails I have seen was of Johnlegend, although he was only as much confused as anybody else here. He used martingale and grand martingale in his own style. Poor members still believed him even after Ophis put his methods in MST and it could easily be seen that his method is not at all a winner.

Quote from: iggiv on January 24, 2014, 03:43:10 AM
he  either lives in a phantasy world or just attracts public attention making up stories. or maybe both.

The only real thing he achieved is that we don't forget him. We do remember him. He is smarter than an  average bear. Draws so much attention. This is a talent. But it has nothing to do with defeating roulette.
Even on short runs. If he were really able to do it, we would not hear from him much, he would be busy traveling  and making money.

Well said, iggiv.


In all my years on roulette forums, I've only come across one person who actually demonstrated that he could achieve something that all the other braggers boasted about.


We badly need a put-up-or-shut-up facility in this forum, IMO.

QuoteYou guys do not believe me yet want me to tell about my HG. Why are you so confused? Allibaba

No, please don't tell us.  Such power in our hands would simply destroy society.

Off the top of my head, these are the members who have made claims of consistent winning (at roulette):


1. Spike
2. Gizmo
3. Albalaha
4. Bayes 
5. John Legend*
6. Mr J
7. XXVV
8. superman
9. Marshall Bing Bell**
10. FLAT_IN_O
11. Ophis


* a demonstrable failure
** a demonstrable success