my hg, 
will win 1u, if next 100,
has =>30hit.

this is for academic purpose only,
as unplayable in bm,
due to high staking of nearly 200...if 30/100 materialise.

you may say,
" less than 30hit may happen!",
but assured , you will never stumbled upon, in your lifetime!

30/100 is worst, and  limit in bm.
(believe it, take it or leave it)

I will not bare all,
those understand,
will of course ,
post nothing here, 
and those eager
needs to do very hard thinking.

it is very simple,
it is math correct,

labby needs
33.34%,to close.period.
30/100 can't close.

30/(33.34%)=89hand/spins,
to close...

now, a few members reading this,
already shouting eureka!...
and jumping very high ,
till head nearly hit the ceiling!

and a few already shouting...
"Fool!!!! You opened the p...box!!!"

Others newbies, may say "Jerk! You say NOTHING HERE!?"

"Nothing?!"
I already give you,
one of my hg's clue.
more to come...

Dear Albalaha,
Sir, with due respect,

Since you the best and
knowledgeable here,

may I ask one question.

in all your files,
what the worst ever ,
single dozen hit, per 100 spins?

your answer will very helpful
to build a strategy around the virtual limit.
thanks in advance

hg doesn't mean
you bet straight away
when you sit at the table.

1)waiting for extreme variance to pass.

you wait out, for advantage,
in oversimplified eg.
streak of losses is often recurring event.
you often see 4,5,6,7..
even 10 losses in row.
why take the obvious
losing risk?
thus only fools won't wait.

2) understand the logic of rtm.

in simple logic, after extreme,
win lose ratio will move toward, "math expectation", in long term.
thus become a  more 'stable' ratio.

3)random virtual limit.
understand something won't
happened ...
in your lifetime...

four zeros won't hit when you bet green.
40black in row won't happen,
in EC, only 30hit/100 and  68hit/200spins won't happen when you bet,(69/200 record still hold).
simply mean an extra extreme variance,
you won't see when you bet in your lifetime!

4) progression that withstand the extreme virtual limit , if the 'unexpected' expected virtual limit variance hit, your progression can withstand it.

5)bet selection that
always selective to ,
wait to bet and stop bet, when extreme and virtual limit hit.

oversimplified eg.
we know 30/100 or 69/200 the known limit in EC.
now i wanna bet, say, 'player', baccarat.
i wait for ,say, 7,8,9, or even 10 banker.
if i wait for, say,  after 10 banker hit,
(then v-limit 30/100, simply mean
there "would be " at least ,
30player in next 90hand, that's 33%.)

and applying Albalaha's variance avoidance strategy, stop betting after say, 4losses in row, thus outwait potential, streaks of losses...and resume when a win hit.

Albalaha found that, the worst
ever recorded in EC, =only 30win
in 100bet,
and we all knew labby could only win
with at leastg 33%+1win.

Thus, apart from the deadly marthy
at the very last unemerging win, and huge br

we could, for academic understanding.
win even only 30w/100bet...
How, by manipulating the virtual labby
betting.

presume every
next 100bet has only 30hit
wait for long string of losses,
eg.
9row of losses,
or
only 1w in 11bet,
or only 2w in say, 13bet,
or only 3w, in 15bet,
then we could trick the virtual
labby, it has 34win to close!!!

how, by assuming the previous four
losses as a win, in the labby progression,
then...there be at least 30hit, as deduce
by Albalaha's 30/100!
then the labby must closed,
when worst ever 30win materialise before
or at the 100th spin or bet!

Hi Albalaha,
Sir,
the EC could hit ,
only,
30 win, in 100spins...
apart from math 50%,

thus by simple logic,
to avoid hell,
as
expound by many,

if in next 100hand,
player hit only 30,
then

*Follow the Last Majority*,

may at least, prevent us to
face the hell.
(the mm is another topic,
as we intend to
avoid the hell,
though together with,
the strategy of,
"stop bet, after,
four losses",
as expounded by you,
to avoid long losses.)

If the next 100,
player banker is 50/50,
then follow last majority ,
will not cause us to face hell too...

The main PURPOSE,
is to avoid the 30/100 hell,
and to have a STABLE ,
as close possible,
within math results.

The majority may,
the last 4,5,6,7,8,9,or ten.

if the last ten hand, there were ,
say, 8 player, and 2 banker,
then the logic, instruct us,
to bet player...
if we hit straight four losses,
we stop,
till the result stabilise.

We may try this
with your previous samples ,
only 30hit in 100, we will see,
we keep hitting winnings

Gentlemen,
RTM simply mean regression after imbalance toward more balanced result....albeit after very long spins or hand.

Since LABBY needs only 33.34%hit to produce profit.
then we need long ...1000spins hands to always win at least 1u.

We never heard 1000spins hit less than 33.4%...
THUS what and where the problem to win even 1u?

Gentlemen.
With due respect.

Anyone here knows,
what the worst ever single dozen/100spins?

Albalaha says that he found 19dz/100...in his 15000spins.

by calculating 19x2=38/100=38%.

that's way above 33.34%needed for simple labby start with single digit 1...to close before the 100th spin.

imho....single dz labby is better than EC...simply because streaks of losses and streak of hit...more visible....

yes..visible.
as we don't and can't predict..
.but we can READ THEM AS IT HAPPENING.
and act accordingly.
if ever worst=19/100..then simple logic tell us.
after 10streak of no hit.
there may 19dz/90spins...which not scary.

GENTLEMEN.
Albalaha insist that labby and johnny..
will be suicidal when the very last 33.34% comes lately...and the marthy come playfully.


Albalaha is right in this view.
but that another topic.

Why Belgian..insist on betting labby..200spins.

because labby needs >33.34%win to close.
and worst known record ec 69red/200...well above the said 33.34%...and thus must close.
why 65?..because 65x3=195=33.33%.
the debacle are br..table limit...and miss marthy...
but it must close

Gentlemen,
Albalaha has posted that the worst he could find in Zumma bacarat EC is 30p/100hand.
In bm roulette record..it more than 30red/100spins.
Anyone here has BM record that less than 30hit/100?
Please post them here.
We could then regard it as virtual limit record.
Thanks in advance