"Phoenix Rising" meets "Follow The Leader", the video demonstration.

HG by Buffster

Check out my instead of written instructions.
Specifically the 4 newest videos on my Utub channel.

Imagine roulette as a new game, in this game a person thinks a number and the purpose is to guess correctly that number.

The player asks: -"is it 0?"
The roulette person responds: -"no"

The player continues: -"is it 0?"
The roulette person responds: -"no"

The player continues: -"is it 0?"
The roulette person responds: -"no"

Player: -"is it 0?"
Roulette person: -"no"

Player: -"is it 0?"
Roulette person: -"no"

Player: -"is it 0?"
Roulette person: -"no"

Player: -"is it 0?"
Roulette person: -"no"

Player: -"is it 0?"
Roulette person: -"no"

Player: -"is it 0?"
Roulette person: -"no"

and the story goes on...

This is dedicated to Buffstair 
The old ones around the net, like Ken for example, know him.


When Nicola Tesla emphasized the importance of 3, 6 and 9 was not without serious reason, as a matter of fact the roulette game has such pattern all over it and we know it as Law Of Thirds.


So here it is, without too much talking let's get to the point.
This system bets a variety of 24 numbers, but only 24.
Aims to achieve net profit within any 37 spins (73 optional).
No "triggers", just play on with continuous bets.


If you change even the slightest of the rules then you are NOT playing "HG by BuffSter"


1st bet - 1st level } 1 win / 1 bet 2 dozens = 24 numbers, 1 spin
Bet the last 2 dozens, if wins then maintain the same dozens, if loss then continue on the next level

2nd level } 3 wins / 6 bets cycle for 4 lines = 24 numbers, 7 spins
Bet the last 4 lines

3rd level } 6 wins / 12 bets cycle for 8 streets = 24 numbers, 19 spins
Bet the last 8 streets

4th level } 9 wins / 18 bets cycle for 12 splits = 24 numbers, 37 spins
Bet the last 12 splits

(optional) 5th level } 18 wins / 36 bets cycle for 24 numbers, 73 spins
Bet the last 24 numbers


At any level the ratio we aim to achieve is 50% wins out of all bets while we are betting with 65% coverage roughly.
Sooner or later, at some point within the 37 spins cycle, the results conform to the required win ratio.
The money management divides the total loss by the total of required wins of current level ONLY and those wins multiplied by the net profit.
For example, let's say we lost the 1st bet with dozens and now the loss is -2, on 2nd level we aim to win 3 times multiplied by 2 units net profit for each of those 3 wins equals 6.
Thus as long as the loss remains below the virtual bank of expected profit we will not raise units.


The selection is important because it begins with 2 hit numbers out of 24, then for the lines the proportion becomes 4/24, then on the streets becomes 8/24, on the splits 12/24 and if you ever need to bet the 5th level with the straight up numbers would be the last 24 numbers from 38th spin up to and including 73rd spin.

Write down the last 18 results in rotating way in which the new number replaces the oldest in this 18 numbers list.
We are going to bet 34 numbers with 17 splits, all of them in horizontal manner.
Always we are betting against the 18th (oldest) number in the list plus its pair number in that split.


For example the 18th oldest number was the 24, we would left uncover the numbers 21-24.
The horizontal splits are: 1-4, 2-5, 3-6, 7-10, 8-11, 9-12, 13-16, 14-17, 15-18, 19-22, 20-23, 21-24, 25-28, 26-29, 27-30, 31-34, 32-35, 33-36.
So we are betting continuously till we lose, if it is by number 0 then we would be down by 17 units and bet 0 with 1 unit for 17 spins.


By winning with 0 we would recover plus profit regardless when it hits within the 17 bets.
If 0 would not come then on 18th, after 17 bets with the 0, we would place 17 splits to all horizontal except 3-6 and the number 0 of course.
We lost 17+17=34 units thus each split should has 35 units in order to coup +1 all at once.
The same would happen if after 18 spins the same split repeats, we would bet the split which made us lose for the next 17 spins with the following progression: 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4
A win on any of the 17 spins provides net profit, if that split would not hit then we would bet again against it with 62 units on all the rest of the splits (17 x 62).


So in order to lose a number or split has to come in 3 intervals of 18 spins, the first is when we set it as target to bet against, the second makes 34 numbers lose, at this point is reasonable to switch and bet for it since it has repeated in the last 18 spins.
If it wouldn't come for third time then why not to sleep for ONCE MORE?!
That's why on the final bet we switch again and bet against it.
The BR is demanding as it requires 1,115 units, but you could just play only the first bet (17 units) or the 2 first bets (61 units).

There is a winning system for every table and a winning table for every system.
Everything could make you win or lose, play the game in your mind and see how it unfolds...millions of possibilities but one could lose only by his/her selections, amounts are irrelevant because they don't determine results, a won bet is a win regardless of the units standing upon it, the same goes for the lost ones.


I'm going to show you 2 bet selections for roulette, both are single number flat betting.


The first has to do with what are the last 6 spun numbers, we are looking for a repeat which is accompanied by 2 single hit numbers which are being located within 6 pockets to the right or left of the repeated number, thus 2 hits for the targeted number plus 2 more hits for its satellites, 4 out of 6 last spins should be like this.
When you have such event bet the repeater only for as long as:


1) hits at least once per 36 spins
2) while betting continue checking for another event, if there is then change immediately to the next target
3) if 36 bets no hit then stop betting and wait the dealer to change or change the table
4) if no event to trigger the betting within 37 spins then wait for new dealer or change table


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


My second method is being used when I've no opportunity from the first.


Check the matrix to see the last number, from that number find its triangle numbers, for example say last number was 18, directly across the wheel is number 27, on the middle, between 18 and 27 there is 24, from the other side number 15, so the triangle of 18 is the numbers 27, 24 and 15.
Every number has a triangle, this is just an example.


So the next step is to see if 27 has hit within last 18 spins, if it did NOT then start betting it until:
1) if 18 hits twice before 27 once find another target
2) if 15 or 24 hits then change your bet to the opposite number of the one which hit, for instance hit 24 then change your bet from 27 to 15.


The triangulate method is based that on every single hit should be polarized with another one, but when 2 hits on the same number within last 18 spins then the opposite pole number should be avoided.
Also when the horizontal pole pair is being activated it is time to change if you are on the vertical pair and vice versa.
We don't wait a number to lose many times, we determine our selection by cross reference.

I've some questions which, hopefully, you can help me understand.

1.How possible is an, approximately, 80% of all forums' members to have a long term winning strategy such as yours?
2.Would not that be highly unlikely?
Now this question is not entirely hypothetical but based on my personal observation over the course of years;
3. There are not as many members as they used to be
4. From the fewer members there is significant less interest in participating on topics regarding strategies and in general about how to win on long term basis than what it used to be on the past
5. People prefer to discuss more about unrelated subjects rather than contributing all as a team to a mutual and beneficial cause/goal
6. More minds are able to achieve easier and better than a single alone
7. Even if you would share a long term winning method, do you think that all gamblers worldwide would read your topic?
8. Do you think that from those who would read it all of them would use it, let alone to the letter??
9. Do you think that casinos would close, stop roulette game, or even change its rules, which have never changed since 1 and a half century ago???
10. What is the real reason behind this behavior?
11. Don't you think that forums are a great mean to connect people worldwide under a common cause/goal?
12. Why they are not focused groups of individuals, instead we see too much blah blah speaking about nothing practically, or about promoting products and services to potential customers?
13. Why when there were important efforts a few persons derailed those topics and from the practical considerations we ended up striving to prove a point, defending our positions from the intruding negativity?
14. If some have found something which works AND don't desire to share it then what on earth are they doing here?
15. If they want to have a conversation and/or pass time then why they don't do it outside forums, with any other persons and/or activities??

To my great disappointment I came to realize that I'm speaking alone and the forums are not being used the way it's meant to be used!

Hello all! 


Lately I was thinking about probability in general and I'd like to share these thoughts with you, perhaps we could reach an understanding, a consensus if we really try.


So here is my first question:
1) If we would record 100 results per time, wouldn't be more probable to witness an unequal distribution (at any degree above even) among equal chance options?


I don't have to test it, I know it is true and not not only is true but also is valid every time for everything.


2) Realizing the answer regarding the first question then the next reasonable question is; how such fact could be exploited, how can we make use of such information?


Thus we are certain for something, anything will be ahead, will lead but we don't know which and when.
When some options are under-performing it is because their counterparts are over-performing, you cannot have one without the other, period.


3) How could we know which and when?


I'm going to reply this by the following wise quote: "A journey of 1,000 miles begins with a single step..."
Recall in retrospective a snapshot of 37 results, we could say: "Oh, number 35 came 4 times, if I was betting that number..."
How could we knew, what criteria would make us select the specific bet option?
Any bet selection before it grows exponentially begins with 1 single appearance.


Can you argue with these facts so far?


Regardless of what that selection may be, there are always leaders and followers, the real question is: "Do we want to be with the leader?"
Starting by the ECs all the way down to numbers is a long way for something, anything to take the lead.
Each and every bet option has its own betting cycle, when a leader cannot lead any more we are replacing it with another, but no matter which there is always a leader.
We have to extend our event's horizon in order to be able to accommodate minor fluctuations during our march towards the goal.
We need a total of results which could be easily divided in cycles for each and every bet option, for example 72, it's:
36 cycles for ECs
24 cycles for dozens and columns
12 cycles for lines
8 cycles for quads
6 cycles for streets
4 cycles for splits
2 cycles for numbers
All of them are happening simultaneously and are using the universal currency of time, we only adjust our position when we have to and only as much as needed.
A leader could extend its lead or let its followers to catch up, even when numbers proceed hand by hand some other bet options are not progressing so harmoniously, what is happening for 1 number is not the same for more numbers as a group...

Hello everyone!

Everybody is welcome to participate regardless if he/she has experience with remote viewing, intuition, clairvoyance, ESP...etc

I've a couple of questions which hopefully you are going to address in order to shed more light to a shady subject.

So here goes the first one;

In my point of view time exists only as notion and not as energy, is not like electricity or gravity for example, but it's used to set order for past events (history) and future events (schedule,plan).

Furthermore ageing effect can be precisely described as a biological process rather than an effect of an invisible energy.
Time and motion are irrelevant since what we call time passes by regardless if we are moving or not, everything we do takes a part of our lives.

I believe it's 100% possible to discover longevity in near future since this is a biological procedure, but inventions such as time machines will never been realized because are pure fiction.
I also believe that the future is constant work in progress, is being generated on the present by our actions and decisions, it's not set in stone like a predetermined destiny which regardless of what we do it's already there.

Besides if something had already being decided before us, for us, what would be the point of free will?
Therefore we could claim that future is fluid, flexible and could alter even from one moment to the next.

Question number 1}

How could someone "see" something which is not already there?!

We could make some calculations and estimations and declare that if situation remain the same then this is what will happen, because we've not see it in a future's glimpse but because we have saw it in the past.
It is true that most, if not all, are events which have already occurred at least once in the past, different people are saying and doing the same...

Time for question number 2}

Let's assume there were two individuals with precognition abilities inside the same room to bet on roulette, they ignore each other's psychic abilities and bets, thus there would not be any influence on each other.

Are those two persons supposed to "see" and bet the same things assuming same level of precognition ability?

Different kind of randoms and guesses, RNG's and decks of cards are unknown but already predetermined since the random generated sequence has already plenty of results in the "que" before you click to see them, similarly the decks within a shoe are already predetermined sequence/results.

On the other hand craps and roulette (real wheel) have not predetermined outcomes which someone could "see" a glimpse of the future, because simply are not anything there yet.

In my opinion it could be done with RNG's and card games what you call precognition, on craps and live roulette wheels could not be used precognition as prediction, but telekinetic energy emitted by brainwaves could influence the dice, the ball, the wheel...of course manipulation is unethical cheating if you'd asked me.

Sometimes the best way to predict the future is to create it!

Are any of you aware of any online casinos which offer live wheels, from studios or B&M casinos, with more than 30 seconds duration from spin to spin?

Please share it here.

Hello everyone!

I'm not sure if you are aware of the roulette multiball or multiwheel, in any case I'd like to share with you my thoughts about the particular game.

It's exactly the same rules as normal roulette but players have the option to bet simultaneously on up to 6 different wheels.
Each wheel's result is independent from the rest, the same goes for each successive spin.

So if I was betting 6 numbers on all 6 wheels simultaneously it'd be similar of betting 1 number for 36 consecutive spins, but with 1 important difference!

While betting 1 number for 36 spins provides the opportunity to win up to 35 times your stake by risking 36 times your bet, the simultane play could make you win up to 6 times 35 equals 210 times your stake but without increasing the risk of potential loss of 36 times your bet.

You might argue that hitting the same number on all 6 wheels has less chance to occur but you are wrong since each wheel's outcome is independent from the rest.
Therefore the probability to have the same number hit in 6 spins in a row is different from the chance to have the same number come up in 6 different wheels.
While on multiple wheels your chance for each number per wheel remains the same: 1 to 37 = 2.7%, the probability for 6 spins in a row is 36 in the 6th power (36x36x36x36x36x36).

Seems like something interesting to say the least, except if I'm wrong.
I'd like to know your view regarding this, what do you think?

Quotethis is actually what Life is all about - growth and development.

XXVV

"As long I'm living I'm learning'' Plato

I'd like to personally thank you for your support against the ridiculous claims of Caleb Johnson.
However, it wasn't necessary because I've encountered his situation numerous times across different forums and I've learned that such person cannot be considered seriously.
Every time I'm reading his posts which are directed against what I'm doing and what I believe, I'm laughing so hard that tears rolling on my cheek! 

Dear Rich, I want you to know that there are people who admire your work, so encourage you to contribute further and eventually leave a heritage of knowledge for the generations to come.

It could mean everything, it could mean nothing, but I believe that such ''hard'' questions are helping to realize where we stand and why we hold such position.

I don't want to influence your votes but I have some rhetoric questions;

If a progression and/or money management were the only assets one needs to become long term winner, wouldn't we already winning on long term basis?
My opinion regarding progressions is that all belong to 2 main categories:

1) Losing frequently less money and winning few times more money
2) Losing rarely large sums and winning frequently few money

There are also sub-categories of the main 2, but no matter how you decrease or increase your bets and your bankroll from session to session you cannot become winner if your selection has not an edge.
I believe that progressions only change the distribution of wins VS losses ratio, but not the totals.

Talking about bet selection, is payout the only element one should consider?
Or there are more elements than this?
Statistics for example could assist to establish some specific entry and exit points, of course everything is an approximation and estimation according facts, not theories, that's why knowing what usually happens is practical and useful, while what could happen is not.

What could happen remains possible but not in the same frequency with what usually happens, therefore by selecting an event which occurs with high frequency in combination with not losing too much when you lose is the essence of winning.
What I've described is the possible effect of a bet selection, not of progressions.

You might argue that all bet sections will balance out eventually, let's assume that this is correct, why does this prevent someone winning?
Perhaps because your first assumption (events have to balance) leaded to another one which is that someone would stay with the same bet selection all the time!
So no matter if one gets ahead or behind, by keep on betting always the same, eventually would lose by the house edge percentage because events have to balance out at some vague point in future.

I don't know about you, but for me this theory contains many ifs in order to be accepted as de facto axiom.
If...we could assume many things without practical value, we've to discard such things in order to focus on the most important.

This is a flat betting method which attempts to profit from repeaters and sleepers.

Start by betting the last spun number and add each new number.
Continue this way till new bankroll high or till you have bet 18 unique numbers.

Whenever you reach a new high before you bet 18 uniques, restart by betting the last spun number.
When you have bet 18 uniques without new high, this means there were 19 unique numbers including your last loss, continue by betting the remaining 18 sleepers.

Whenever a "sleeper" awakes remove it from the bet selection, thus gradually you would bet 18, then 17, then 16, 15, 14, and finally 13 numbers, aiming to win 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23 units respectively.
As a safeguard we will bet those "sleepers" till one of the following conditions happens first:

1) You have reached a new bankroll high
2) You won 6 times
3) After 13 spins none of the above conditions have been met

Restart from scratch and repeat the procedure

Grab a pen and a paper and write down each number that hits, alternatively write all numbers from 0 to 36 and each time a number hits cross it out or circle it with your pen.

Continue to do so till there are only 2 numbers remaining which have not appeared yet, at that time bet everything else except these two numbers, for only one spin.

It costs mostly in time, but a guaranteed 2.8% return on your investment.

Cheers, to your success!

J. Laurie Snell




R. D ELLISON



DO YOU HAVE THE POWER TO BREAK THE BOUNDS OF FALLACY??!


J. Kavouras








THESE ARE THE 4 PILLARS OF A WINNING BET!



ROULETTE TERMINOLOGY

Doubling up:


Team play:



Proposition bets:
It's when the dealer proposes what you should bet

Lucky dip:
Automatic air ball machines placing your money to 5 random numbers (they were thinking of a special bet named "hand me your money" but it was to blunt)

CASINO ETIQUETTE

The principle of this system is simple, take advantage of first-hitters and repeaters, because for every 3 numbers 1 is going to repeat

Start by betting 11 streets, exclude the one which has hit on last spin.

Another number comes and now you remove the street which the new number belongs, but you also place 1 chip of the same value straight up on the hitted number.

You continue on this fashion by removing the chips from the hitted streets one by one and betting simultaneously the hitted numbers where the streets' bets have been removed.

The total amount of streets that you bet will look like this: 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.
The total of the numbers you are betting will look like this: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.

As you see the total amount of your bets never exceeds the 11 units, therefore by winning a street you get +1 unit net and by winning a number +25 units net.

You continue till you win a straight up bet and then restart by betting 11 streets.

We are going to cap the the total loss per round in 33 units (3 x 11) or less if you have already won street bets before you lose 3 times.
When you lose a round, repeat the process but this time with 2 units on each bet.

After each losing round increase bets by 1 unit, after each won round decrease by 1 unit.

Whenever you win a straight up number you stop right there and restart from the beginning, 11 streets betting.

At that time they say that the Emperor Honorius in Ravenna received the message from one of the eunuchs, evidently a keeper of the poultry, that Rome had perished.

And he cried out and said, 'And yet it has just eaten from my hands!'
For he had a very large cock, Rome by name; and the eunuch comprehending his words said that it was the city of Rome which had perished at the hands of Alaric, and the emperor with a sigh of relief answered quickly:
'But I thought that my fowl Rome had perished.'

You are standing by the table and someone is spilling his drink all over the place, now what?

Please choose 1 of the following:

1) Help him/her out
2) Announce to the rest what just happened
3) Call the floor manager
4) Call the police
5) Calmly pick up your chips and move towards another table and/or the exit

You are standing by the table and see Red as the result, what would you bet next?

Please choose 1 of the following:

1)    Red
2)    Black
3)    Zero
4)    The table
5)    Time to leave

I took the idea by reversing completely the system DNA of roulette, by the way, I've never understood what a betting 1 dozen  and 1 column has to do with the law of the thirds.

So here we go:

On the table I separate numbers in groups of 4, those  groups are:

1 4 7 10

2 5 8 11

3 6 9 12

13 16 19 22

14 17 20 23

15 18 21 24

25 28 31 34

26 29 32 35

27 30 33 36

Every time  there are 2 numbers of the same group, back to back, in a row, (that's the trigger) bet the other 2 dozens and the other 2 columns for a total bet of 4 units.

Example:

After number 1 comes number 7, in this case you should bet the 2nd, 3rd dozens plus the 2nd and 3rd columns with 1 unit each.
There are 5 numbers which make us lose 4 units, 16 numbers which make us lose 1 unit and 16 numbers which make us win 2 units net.

If you win that's good, wait for the next trigger opportunity, if you lost, no matter if it's 1 or 4 units, wait for the next trigger.
I'm going to explain a bit about the steps of the progression, since our expected payout is 2 units we should divide the running negative total by 2, for example we lose 4 units so the next bet must be 2 units on each of the dozens and columns and by winning it we are breaking even.

Initial bet 1 unit on each 2 dozens and 2 columns, win +2, lose -1  or -4

-1 } bet 1 unit on each 2 dozens and 2 columns, win +1, lose -2  or -5

-2 } bet 1 unit on each 2 dozens and 2 columns, win and break even, lose -3 or -6

-3 } bet 2 units on each 2 dozens and 2 columns, win +1, lose -5 or -11

-4 } bet 2 units on each 2 dozens and 2 columns, win and break even, lose -6 or -12

-5 } bet 3 units on each 2 dozens and 2 columns, win +1, lose -8 or -17

-6 } bet 3 units on each 2 dozens and 2 columns, win and break even, lose -9 or -18

-7 } bet 4 units on each 2 dozens and 2 columns, win +1, lose -11 or -23

-8 } bet 4 units on each 2 dozens and 2 columns, win and break even, lose -12 or -24

-9 } bet 5 units on each 2 dozens and 2 columns, win +1, lose -14 or -29

-10 } bet 5 units on each 2 dozens and 2 columns, win and break even, lose -15 or -30

-11 } bet 6 units on each 2 dozens and 2 columns, win +1, lose -17 or -35

-12 } bet 6 units on each 2 dozens and 2 columns, win and break even, lose -18 or -36

-13 } bet 7 units on each 2 dozens and 2 columns, win +1, lose -20 or -41

-14 } bet 7 units on each 2 dozens and 2 columns, win and break even, lose -21 or -42

-15 } bet 8 units on each 2 dozens and 2 columns, win +1, lose -23 or -47

-16 } bet 8 units on each 2 dozens and 2 columns, win and break even, lose -24 or -48

-17 } bet 9 units on each 2 dozens and 2 columns, win +1, lose -26 or -53

-18 } bet 9 units on each 2 dozens and 2 columns, win and break even, lose -27 or -54

-19 } bet 10 units on each 2 dozens and 2 columns, win +1, lose -29 or -59

-20 } bet 10 units on each 2 dozens and 2 columns, win and break even, lose -30 or -60

What is past?
Is it the time which has passed away?
Past is 1 minute ago, 1 year ago or a millenia.
Past has existed but it doesn't exist any longer.

What is future?
Future is after 1 minute, after 1 year, after 1 millenia.
Future will exist but it doesn't exist right now.

What is present?
It is this constant temporarily moment, it's a thin line which separates something which has existed but doesn't exist now from something which will exist but doesn't exist at the moment.

Under this perception I regard time as unreal, or human's invention if you prefer.
Past, present and future can never exist in the same instance, the proper definition of time is:
"a schedule of events placed in a specific linear order".

Thus aging is not the effect of time but the biological consequences of the human body.
Perhaps in the future longevity would be reality, but "time-machines" belong in the fictitious sphere.

What  all these have to do with roulette?
Roulette has events too, many events actually.

So, let's  say we want to gather a small sample of those events, therefore the first step is to create a list with 37 last numbers.
Next step is to focus on three points;

1) Bet the furthest back (older) number } PAST

2) Bet the before last (penultimate) number } PRESENT

3) Bet the last number } FUTURE

This goes on for a maximum of 36 successive results or till the point you are in positive.
I'm going to give you an example:

34 <-------- Past starts here and descending (older)
8
33
16
0
9
15
36
8
6
24
5
28
33
7
3
4
26
34
2
36
4
0
24
10
8
13
14
6
13
6
20
26
9
16
3 <--------- Present starts here and ascending (before last)
6 <--------- Future starts here and goes on as the futured results are unfolding
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

26 <------- Bet 34 (past), 3 (present) and 6 (future)  Result: -3 units
20 <------- Bet 8 (past), 16 (present) and 26 (future) Result: -3 units
12 <------- Bet 33 (past), 9 (present) and 20 (future) Result: -3 units
15 <------- Bet 16 (past), 26 (present) and 12 (future) Result: -3 units
5   <------- Bet 0 (past), 20 (present) and 15 (future) Result: -3 units
2   <------- Bet 9 (past), 6 (present) and 5 (future) Result: -3 units
3   <------- Bet 15 (past), 13 (present) and 2 (future) Result: -3 units
14 <------- Bet 36 (past), 6 (present) and 3 (future) Result: -3 units
2 <------- Bet 8 (past), 14 (present) and *14 (future) Result: -3 units *Optionally 2 units on the same number
18 <------- Bet 6 (past), 13 (present) and 2 (future) Result: -3 units
18 <------- Bet 24 (past), 8 (present) and 18 (future) Result: +33 units (33 - 30 = +3 units net)
2   <------- At this point there are 2 options: restart the procedure or quit the session
11
36
14
25
9
24
5
4
11
23
12
30
12
8
34
13
22
7
5
13
12
10
12
1
32

I'd like to hear your comments, feedback and suggestions

Perhaps a better question would be: "HOW I could win more times than what I'm losing?" rather than how much I should bet in order to win.

By increasing and/or decreasing bets,you are NOT changing the odds.
By saying that I expect to win 30 bets out of 100, this does NOT determine in which order I'm going to have my wins and loses.

Those 2 major facts are the main reasons why most of the progressions fail in the long term, just because they aim to win in a very certain way, a specific turn, sequence.
Besides, any kind of progression is secondary element, the fundamental always must be HOW I could win more times than my losing ones, in other words a method of bet selection.


An example about the turn of expected wins:
Let's say I have the very modest expectation to win 30 bets out of 100 in total.
Would this be the same for our progression to experience 70 loses during the first 70 spins and 30 wins on the remaining in comparison with 10 wins during the first 30 spins,then 10 more till the 60th spin and another 10 winning bets from 91st till 100th spin??


It's a question everyone has to answer,who's considering applying any kind of progression!

Many years have passed since the foundation of the game and still people around the world are in their individual quest for discovering the holy grail.
We have to ask ourselves; Is it realistic expectation or is it vanity??

What exactly do you expect to find and what is the definition of reality for you?
Along the long path of history knowledge has been evolved, thus perception has been shaped accordingly.

When perception changes, your reality is changing..."the world you be is the world you see..."
By understanding a partial reality, I'm not influencing the whole of what is real, nor any of its parts, what I actually change is my angle of perception, in other words the level of my consciousness/awareness.

While no single existing system has perpetually succeed to cease all of the so-called "loopholes", each one of all those "loopholes" has been blocked by at least one system.
Thus, by maintaining a two dimensional mentality in a three dimensional world, you are framing yourself.
The champions of mainstream theory support that each and every result is independent.
Probably you have heard: "roulette has no memory" and every time I recall it I laugh very hard!

So,if you ask me, I'd respond that there is correlation between outcomes and this does NOT have to do with MEMORY!
So who's right and who's wrong??
My answer is EVERYONE and NO ONE!

Everyone partially, up to a certain extend, BUT no one as a WHOLE!
In my point of view, no one can comprehend the COMPLETE "picture" because it's too big and regarding your approach you see ONLY a different part of the WHOLE.
If we were to interpret this generic theory in roulette terms, one could not satisfy all parameters with a single method.

Like Greek ancient philosopher once said: "The only constant (in universe) is the change (evolution)
So when some see only randomness in action, I see the chain re-actions unfolding before my eyes...
I hope to contribute for a greater degree of understanding the events/facts.