Look what I got in my email inbox:

"Tips & Tricks To win Roulette Casino 100% Wining Guaranty.
You can win 3000$ (Three Thousand USD) per Month for Sure.
Simply Buy My DVD & Learn How to Play.
Win every Game and remain Unbeaten.
100% Money Back Guaranty.
Plz Contact : jhsmithuk01@gmail.com
Thank You

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVTL80A5GbI"

DISCLAIMER: I'm not endorsing, nor related in any way with any systems sales!

Regarding currencies I have to add that the more traditional the better it gets, going backwards in time: cryptocurrencies, credit/debit cards are virtual money, just a number on a screen, then the cold hard cash are virtual value, just papers with numbers on them and at last the most traditional and objective values are the precious metals such as gold and gemstones such as diamonds, this is as good as it gets.
It would be easier to turn your virtual money into nothing, one day you are a wealthy person because some digits are saying so and the next they manifest an announcement to declare all of the cryptocurrencies and money notes around the world worthless...it could happen under the excuse of a war (WW3 approximately 2400 AD), of course they keep gathering all of the precious metals and gemstones for themselves.

Traditional values are more stable but tend to extinct since the world is moving towards a virtual reality, a fake reality if you will.
Human values have been degraded as of secondary importance because money became god, materialistic values, consumption,struggle and survival became the meaning of life.
"If you don't produce we cannot tax you, therefore you are useless to us, your life has no value and you have to be terminated because of the overpopulation issue..."
They consider us as numbers, if power is the only thing which matters, without any respect about justice, truth, moral values, love, altruism and ethics then we are doomed because we are living in a jungle and we are no better than animals.

Efforts have been done to make more humanly robots and humans like robots who act without consciousness and judgement, without free will.
One way or the other they are in the process of creating slaves for the generations to come, perhaps slaves is a bit harsh definition and we could replace it by controllable androids (humanized and robotized).
Just think about the artificial financial crisis, the media propaganda, the air we breath, the water we drink, the food we eat...all these have been planned for decades and still going strong.

At the yester years when there were truly ingenious generals and tremendous warriors like Alexander the Great and Achilles, wars being won by the true bravery, courage, intelligence, physical and technical human attributes.
It was much harder and more cruel than now which the only thing it has to be done is just pull a trigger or push a button and millions could be killed within minutes or even seconds.

That's what capitalism and industrialization have enforced indirectly in our lives, this is the legacy they've bestowed for the forthcoming generations.
So think for a minute;
is this the future you want to be?

[attachimg=1]

WE ARE LEGIONS, WE ARE COMING FOR YOU!

QuoteIn my view, I would say it is the COMBINATION of both a conscious bet selection + a conscious money management which can make a true difference.

Vic

This sums it all for me, well said Victor! 

Why would someone play hide and seek by using crypto-currency in the first place, unless there was a serious reason...?

In general, all cryptocurrencies transactions are not being regulated by banks...by choosing them you are effectively adding an additional layer of risk, beyond the one from the game itself.

Is this what you really want?   

Quote from: VLS on September 29, 2017, 01:23:29 PM
What do you think about this mode of betting online?

Creepy...

Ok, I got your point but, the live feed doesn't show how many others (if any) are betting simultaneously, what bets, what amounts...even at a B&M casino when you can see with your own eyes all these you could be "targeted".

Proving such activity is from very difficult to impossible, let me ask you a question, let's say you have tested a method for 48,640 bets approximately and BR lost only twice during all those bets, how would you feel to lose your BR on the 2nd day of your visit at B&M airball roulette?!

Would that made you suspicious, feel that something is wrong, odd...??
That was a real incident for me when I was betting for any number to hit 3 times within 37 spins.
From the same B&M casino I had witnessed similar situations with other 3 methods...!

I'm just trying to explain what I've experienced, whether it's extreme bad luck or cheating is something I'm not 100% certain because I've no evidence but only indications, I cannot initiate a legal case with just my word and indications.

All these and other milder misfortunes enraged me up to the point which I sware to myself to find the ultimate strategy in order to take a share of their money almost at will.
I take cheating very, very seriously, not only because of what I've experienced but also because of my principles/mentality.

PS The single number method which you've mentioned Vic deserves more attention and its own thread.

Buona fortuna e salut las voluptuosas chicas!;-)

Of course when you bet only 1 number you have no time issue but not everybody bets like this.
Speaking about edge it comes only from selection, not the progressions and the money managements!
People who claim otherwise they know stuff about what's going on...yes, I'm using progression but it's not the reason I win regularly.
Last but not least a tip for you Victor because I like you, since you are playing a single number you should know that none of them endures long term but all of them do...;-)

Cheers, to your success!
Or should I say: e viva est mucho alegria!

So if you don't Martingale till you win then you are expecting the wins to be more than the losses?
Even so, no one would become rich by betting like this because the units would fluctuate and at the best case you would be few units up!
The smaller the edge the less units you gain and if you are not a part timer then you must use high value units (black chips or more) in order to make a living.
I'm full time gambler and I know because I've seen all these before...

Every single spin from all sessions was bet, this kind of situation has happened plenty of times before, with other well tested methods at online and B&M casinos...after they figure out what you are betting they prepare sequences against you in a subtle and discreet way, they don't want to lose much before they get rid of you in such way, once you become target no matter what you do you remain target for the specific casino.

You are speaking like you admire them, why don't you open a casino in order to materialize the only edge you know Vic?!

I've just finished a session at Paddypower with a new developed method, 1 thing I've confirmed over and over again is that no matter how much you've tested a method, 1 of the worst scenarios happens on the 2nd or 3rd session, whether you've seen it happen only once or twice within 15,000 or even 50,000 bets.

Kind of suspicious don't you think?!

However I managed to come out on top at the end, someone else would have cowardly quit with loss.

The most time from spin to spin currently is 27 seconds and when bets proceed I'm struggling to keep up with the game's pace, under such conditions the game is no more pleasant.

I'm attaching the results which I've tested before playing, all of them from real live wheel of Dublinbet casino.
[attachimg=1]                 [attachimg=7]            [attachimg=13]
[attachimg=2]                 [attachimg=8]            [attachimg=14]
[attachimg=3]                 [attachimg=9]            [attachimg=15]
[attachimg=4]                 [attachimg=10]          [attachimg=16]
[attachimg=5]                 [attachimg=11]          [attachimg=17]
[attachimg=6]                 [attachimg=12]          [attachimg=18]
[attachimg=19]               [attachimg=20]          [attachimg=21]

QuoteWithout going into statistical details, imo the magic number to look for is 1 and only 1.
1 may go to 2 or going back to zero.
On the losing side 1 will go more often to 2 whereas on the winning side 1 will go to zero more often than not.

By reading this someone could assume that you are speaking about EC bets exclusively, that principle is not valid for other kind of bets.
In general when you win you don't lose, and when you lose you don't win, there is no middle ground and you cannot have one without the other.

So by focusing on how I could win more I'd effectively minimizing my losses too, the strongest attack is the best defence...when gamblers reacting on given outcomes they get controlled by the variance, but when there is a well laid out plan beforehand then you take the lead instead of reacting and victimising yourself.

Quoteif 90% of your wagers win

I think it's too much for everyone, why 90% when even 55% correct grants you overall profit?

Dear Nick,
What if there were 8 players starting to bet each one of them with 1 result difference, so when the 1st player would bet the last 9th bet of the sequence simultaneously the last 8th player would wager his 1st bet of the 9 sequence...?

Do you understand where I'm going with this?

Those 8 players would bet differently even using the same AP (method), when there are losing decisions the only way to come out on top is to Martingale, but even so there's no guarantee that you'd always get at least 1 win within a sequence of 9 roughly 50/50 outcomes.

You said after observing the 1st outcome the remaining possible sequences become 256 from 512, after observing the 2nd outcome the remaining possible sequences become 128 from 256, after observing the 3rd outcome the remaining possible sequences become 64 from 128, after observing the 4th outcome the remaining possible sequences become 32 from 64, after observing the 5th outcome the remaining possible sequences become 16 from 32, after observing the 6th outcome the remaining possible sequences become 8 from 16, ...till you reach the 9th in which there will remain only 2 possible outcomes!WOW! 

Why this AP reminds me the infamous Martingale? 

Do you think by knowing the binomial probability that can help you predict what's coming up next?

Let me give you a hint, all of the sequences of the same length have equal probability to occur, but if we take a large sample such as 1000 outcomes and divide it to 100 sequences of 10 decisions each we would find more sequences with 5 a side decisions, regardless of their order.
At least that's what theory has to say, what could happen is another thing.

I'm sorry Nick but you can't sidestep probability, that's a fact!

Regarding the inverted strategy mentioned by Esoito I'd like to add a few things.

By analyzing results in a retrospective fashion we could realize the significance of the sequence's order.

Each and every new result leads us to a new decision to make (what and/or how much to bet).
For example 2 players applying the same betting system but entering on game in different time would bet different and their bottom line would also be different.
You could imagine the whole situation as a tornado/cyclone, variance "pushes" bets gradually higher and towards the outer rings like a centrifugal force.

But why this happens?
A fixed set of rules (system/bet selection) is a static condition while variance is a dynamic, when 2 opposing conditions meet it's going to prevail the stronger, they couldn't coexist because are different, but in case we had 2 of the same then they would merge to 1 greater.

In other words don't try to tame in vain the variance waves when you only have to "ride" them.
Progressions and stop win/loss limits wouldn't be necessary if there was proper bet selection on the first place.
It doesn't help to realize the obvious after it happens, "I'm losing so let's stop from this table or for today..."
"I'm winning so let's run to the exit before my luck changes..."

The really important and useful would be to prevent big loss before it happens, so the million $ question is how!
Common sense says that before it's going to rain you'll see clouds in the sky...from the time you notice the first clouds gathering till the first raindrops there will be sufficient time to open an umbrella or to get indoors...

It's all about perception and interpretation, when I focus on what I should then I've 2 available options since I cannot stop the "rain", change what I'm currently doing (umbrella) or quit (get indoors).
We cannot set a universal stop win/loss limit simply because there's no 1 size fits all situations!

Therefore we have to adapt a flexible strategy in order to adjust to the ever changing stream of events.
The game could be one or two way street, we've to live with both situations in order to come out on top.

Quote from: TheMagician on September 24, 2017, 04:25:58 PM
If you want to quote someone famous historical figure, at least use their proper name. It wasn´t Buddha (not Budda) that said that. It was Gautama Buddha, or Siddharta Gautama.

Buddha is merely a denomination given to beings of an immense spiritual awakening, known as Unexcelled Complete Enlightenment, in classical Sanskrit also known as,  Annutara-Samhyak-Sambodhi. ( In my youth I lived for a while in some Japanese Zen Buddhist Temples so I picked up a few things.)

I'm sorry, you know better.
Thank you for your enlightenment!

QuoteMost people are more interested in their car than in discovering the deepest level of themselves and the Whole wide universe beyond clocks and cars. And gamblers do not grow into Heaven. Greed and selfish stuff are superficial values.

Dane

Nice point Dane, most people are shallow and make their lives harder by their own deeds.
Humans are prisoners of their own desires and identities. Budda