In my point of view time exists only as notion and not as energy, is not like electricity or gravity for example, but it's used to set order for past events (history) and future events (schedule,plan).

Furthermore ageing effect can be precisely described as a biological process rather than an effect of an invisible energy.
Time and motion are irrelevant since what we call time passes by regardless if we are moving or not, everything we do takes a part of our lives.

In case you didn't know that's called ageing and it's 100% due to human biology, cells regeneration slows down.
Like I said everything can be explained by means other than time.

Time is an illusion, everything can be explained by other means but time.

Time is not about where you could go but about how you feel for a moment in your life, loss sense of time, time passes fast (quickening), time passes slowly (boredom)...in a way time is human invention and exists only within us.

Quote from: TheMagician on September 24, 2017, 09:27:16 AM
The derivative of Ed´s lengthy proposition is very basic Roulette. He advocates simply to play straight ups (numbers) that are, as a bet selection, in a positive variance curve. I used plain, good English when I described that in my previous posts. What Ed wrote about is the only working method. He calls it Anti system, or whatever, I apply a more suitable mathematical expression on it. The way is still the same. He may use a strict approach with some notations, I use advanced platforms with good graphics describing the curve and the right moment to bet and win or, even better, when won, also when not to bet.

Your mental inability to understand that,  and your childish way of using "rebellious" expressions as to show your disdain for those that you feel  do not "comprehend" applied reality as it is, is not my problem. It is yours.

If this is your way of saying: "you are right, I agree", then I'm glad to read it.
I've no problem with my "rebellious" expressions, I see no reason why would you. (?)

Quote from: owenslv on September 23, 2017, 04:04:39 PM
Fascinating. To add to your concept, rather than read the future, I wonder if you can you create the future ? Thoughts are energy and energy by nature can either be constructive or destructive. So does a focused thought create the potential for a future event?
Wow, what a concept - a cosmic balance of global thought creating a present reality, and being able to focus that thought to create a predetermined outcome. Glad I read your post.

The only ones who can predict the future are those who create it with one way or the other.
I'm not suggesting you to use ESP in order to gain an edge on casino games, this has, at least, moral issues.
What you believe and do is totally up to you, your decision, your responsibility.

Quote from: esoito on September 23, 2017, 11:25:01 PM
I use "a future " deliberately rather than  "the future" because there are a multiplicity of futures.

For example, each time you make a decision you create several alternative futures -- there's the one in which you make the opposite decision, and there's the one in which you did not make a decision.
But your reality is based on the future created by the decision you made, and that future has become your current 'now'. The other futures exist but remain unvisited by you. I Don't perceive it this way

There ya go. I'll leave you to unpick the threads and notions in this post. Doctor Who fans shouldn't have too much trouble! What do you mean by that?

"Imagination rules the nation" Napoleon Bonaparte

If you really believe that then you've been brainwashed!
You swallow every chunk of horse stuff they provide you instead of spitting it back to their face!

Here's what TurboGenius has to say:

Random rarely ever equals "equality".

So for example - if we take 1000 spins - without "random" we could have 500 reds and 500 blacks (not accounting for the zero/00 of course for simplicity.
With random however - we have a tiny slight chance of it being 500 and 500 but most of the time it won't be.
Much like 38 repeats of the same number - the "math guys" will point to some small number/chance and say "it's possible".
It's incredibly unlikely.
So we can avoid the idea that using anything "random" will end in equality.
It also doesn't mean that there is some push towards equality - this seems to be common with systems that don't work - because there were more reds than blacks, somehow there will now be more blacks to try to catch up to reds.
This doesn't happen.
These types of systems always fail.
Random does however keep itself contained - you won't have 10 times the number of reds than you do blacks.
Random has limits and over time you can calculate these as well.
We can look at standard deviations and see that a number might be +4 std but it won't stay there - there's not equality with other numbers, but there is some type of balance or boundaries that random stays within.
I always think of this as a rubber band around the results - it can stretch but it's held within a specific range because of random.

To hit on bets for a minute as well - I rarely see people playing the even money bets or the dozens/columns or streets/lines and that's good (in my opinion).
Think about it this way - even if you could have close to 500 red and 500 blacks - when you look at individual numbers you'll see there is nothing of the sort going on there.
As I posted in the other thread - you won't see each number hit 3 times exactly in 3 cycles of spins.
This is a sign right away that things not being equal is the door to winning.
Just knowing this along should steer people away from the outside bets and playing individual numbers is the way to go.

As you move from even money bets through the betting locations until you get to straight-up bets, you can see that the chance of there being equality gets less and less likely the further you go.
While you might see 500 reds and 500 blacks, you'll never see 3 of each number appearing for 3 cycles, 5 of each number appearing for 5 cycles, etc etc.
This makes it clear that there is a benefit in playing repeaters.
It might seem more logical to think about this way - if you could avoid betting on the numbers that aren't going to show up over X amount of spins and you "could" bet on numbers that appear multiple times over those same X amount of spins - you would never lose.
This is true and entirely possible.
"Just don't bet on numbers that aren't going to show".
"Any number that hasn't shown up is potentially a number that WON'T show up". You're playing repeaters then.
It's just logical.
Playing random numbers, lucky (coughs) numbers, birthdays, flat betting, switching tables when down X amount, stopping when X ahead or X down all makes no sense. You're going to win playing repeaters.
Are hot numbers going to stay hot ?
No - like I said, the rubber band around the results keep a hot number from going out of control and staying hot and showing more and more and more above expected.
The same for cold numbers - they won't stay cold, but they won't catch up either with any regularity that you can bet on and win.
Run 1,000 spins and note the top 15 hottest numbers.
Run another 1,000 and re-check.
A few will have dropped off of the list right ?
Of course - but.... some of them will remain and continue to stay hot.
Another 1,000 spins ?
More drop off, some stay.
Another 1,000 spins ?
Now someone can say - "what good is that, you don't know which ones are going to do what - it's random !!!" but they aren't thinking really.
We can use progressions - which make up for the fact that we have no idea with 100% accuracy which ones will do which.
No one can predict that kind of info, and we don't have to.
We're not playing ALL of the numbers on the table.
Cold number staying cold - we don't lose on them.
Hot numbers going cold - we don't lose on them.
Hot numbers staying hot - we don't win or lose on them - and numbers becoming hot ?
We make a killing with the progression in place that covers any loss from not being 100% accurate with the other categories.

The anti-system people are first to jump in and say that it's mumbo-jumbo and some "mystery" that no one can figure out - it's up to you to agree with them or not.
They won't deny though that the only way to win is to play numbers that show above expected (which are hot numbers) and to NOT play numbers that aren't showing up (common sense).
They can throw rocks at the idea that a system and progression based on repeaters is nonsense - but at the same time they surely have to understand that it makes complete sense, and that the road to always winning is down that road.

For those who don't know Ed (TurboGenius), he is one of the most prolific and flamboyant system creators.
When such ideas come forth, as the one above, I cry out loud:
I'm in love with your brain! 

Hello everyone!

Everybody is welcome to participate regardless if he/she has experience with remote viewing, intuition, clairvoyance, ESP...etc

I've a couple of questions which hopefully you are going to address in order to shed more light to a shady subject.

So here goes the first one;

In my point of view time exists only as notion and not as energy, is not like electricity or gravity for example, but it's used to set order for past events (history) and future events (schedule,plan).

Furthermore ageing effect can be precisely described as a biological process rather than an effect of an invisible energy.
Time and motion are irrelevant since what we call time passes by regardless if we are moving or not, everything we do takes a part of our lives.

I believe it's 100% possible to discover longevity in near future since this is a biological procedure, but inventions such as time machines will never been realized because are pure fiction.
I also believe that the future is constant work in progress, is being generated on the present by our actions and decisions, it's not set in stone like a predetermined destiny which regardless of what we do it's already there.

Besides if something had already being decided before us, for us, what would be the point of free will?
Therefore we could claim that future is fluid, flexible and could alter even from one moment to the next.

Question number 1}

How could someone "see" something which is not already there?!

We could make some calculations and estimations and declare that if situation remain the same then this is what will happen, because we've not see it in a future's glimpse but because we have saw it in the past.
It is true that most, if not all, are events which have already occurred at least once in the past, different people are saying and doing the same...

Time for question number 2}

Let's assume there were two individuals with precognition abilities inside the same room to bet on roulette, they ignore each other's psychic abilities and bets, thus there would not be any influence on each other.

Are those two persons supposed to "see" and bet the same things assuming same level of precognition ability?

Different kind of randoms and guesses, RNG's and decks of cards are unknown but already predetermined since the random generated sequence has already plenty of results in the "que" before you click to see them, similarly the decks within a shoe are already predetermined sequence/results.

On the other hand craps and roulette (real wheel) have not predetermined outcomes which someone could "see" a glimpse of the future, because simply are not anything there yet.

In my opinion it could be done with RNG's and card games what you call precognition, on craps and live roulette wheels could not be used precognition as prediction, but telekinetic energy emitted by brainwaves could influence the dice, the ball, the wheel...of course manipulation is unethical cheating if you'd asked me.

Sometimes the best way to predict the future is to create it!

I believe this is also worthwhile: http://www.esotericonline.net/group/vortexmath

Well said Tom, but governments may change from time to time but policies remain the same (or worsen).
Take USA for example, right after the death of Roosevelt, one of the best American presidents, allies defeated nazis but evil prevailed as transformation from a direct threat from Germany to an indirect threat based at USA...the foundation established back then and lives on till today, such evil is worse than nazis, I dare to say, because it's been hidden and pull strings constantly from the background...


Of course Malta isn't the only interesting destination, could be Portugal or Morocco, not to mention destinations beyond the Mediterranean sea...

Quote from: Bally6354 on September 21, 2017, 04:20:47 PM
Nobody should ever really expect to read about a sure-fire winning method on a forum....just isn't happening, period! My conclusion is that you slowly learn what doesn't / can't work despite all the hype and even good intentions from the author. I must have given loads of bad advice down the years. It wasn't intentional, it was based on my thoughts / experiences at that particular moment in time. So the reality for any reader is that forums are a minefield if you aren't personally prepared to do a lot of hard work and think for yourself with a critical mind.

We all do mistakes and we learn from them, sometimes we don't.
There is a Greek adagio which goes like this:

"Fools don't learn from their mistakes, clever individuals do learn in time and the wise learn from others mistakes".

Sometimes we have to learn living with our mistakes and their consequences.
The fear of mistakes doesn't have to prevent us trying do our best and share/help others.

If nobody would ever share publicly an advantageous strategy then what are we doing here?
Providing teasers which might lead to pitch sales?
Making new online friends?

When people strive together to bring out their positive sides then a progress is being achieved for a mutual benefit.

And last but not least: "The real failure is when you quit trying" J. Baptiste

Quote from: TheMagician on September 21, 2017, 07:57:46 PM
Sorry to hear that. Have you tried Dublinbets new site that has all the good live casinos these days?

Fitzwilliams, Draghonara, Portomaso, S:T Vincent and some more pearls, all under their proxy roof.

Dublinbet and Portomaso are also blacklisted thanks to the Greek government, by using VPN it's like asking for troubles since they don't allow such mediums all of the online casinos.

If we could find an imbalance with 10 results then why do you expect that in 1000 will be any difference?
Don't 1000 contain many set of 10's ?
So if all of the smaller parts from a big total are imbalanced why the grand total should be more balanced?
Isn't this what probability theory dictates, that since every chance is equal we will lose regardless of what we bet because of the lesser payout?
And am asking you, isn't quite an assumption that in some distant and vague future everything will appear equally?
Let me put it another way, when a total of outcomes grows larger, the actual difference between each and every number's appearances only grows bigger proportionally to the sample's growth, what seems to minimizing is the percentage difference.
The actual difference is what it matters, the percentage difference is deceptive.
Perhaps all these theorists have no idea about gamble, by putting many numbers into papers doesn't make you realize how much different could be a theory from reality!
The papers which count the most are the money notes and the significant numbers are not those from equations but these from the results!

I agree Thom, Unibet is the best overall casino in my point of view.
If only I could connect normally from my IP address, you see my issue is not about my account with Unibet but because Unibet is within a long blacklist of online casinos from Greek government.
Situation was not always like his, I was using Unibet for years and the company still accepts Greek residents, but about 2 years ago Greek government forced all internet service providers to make approximately 90% of all online casinos inaccessible for residents of Greece.
And do you know why?!
Because they want to tax every online company, regardless of where it is based, as long as they have Greek clients!
Do you know any other country which acts like a pimp?!
Unfortunately this is one of the many unfair issues they've introduced us over the course of the last decade.
Sorry to say but Greece is only nice for vacations at islands as tourist, certainly not for living and working here.
We became strangers within our home!

I've also seen 15 seconds for live studio roulette!
Why do you think this pattern occurred during the last few years at online casinos?

What you suggest Bally is not convenient for those who every spin matters because it is part of a solid sequence.
Usually that's the case when you chart/record past spins, of course for hard cored maths wouldn't matter.

Personally I'm somewhere in the middle, sometimes I'm charting and need at least 50 seconds, while other times I'm not looking back and even 20 secs are sufficient duration.
If I had to choose between 20 secs and 2 mins, the 1st could force you to mistakes and/or missed bets, also makes you feel more anxious because of the time pressure, while with the 2nd option the only negative is that could become a bit boring while waiting, in my point of view it's by far better to wait a bit longer rather than having the disadvantages of 20 to 30 seconds.

While waiting I could take notes, drink, place bets, chat, look around, order...in general have peace of mind and my composure and concentration intact.
It's one thing when results are against you and completely another to force you indirectly to do costly mistakes!

Quote from: Ted009 on September 21, 2017, 08:05:28 AM
I saw one www2.aa2888.com with 33 seconds.

Frankly I don't like the look of it, seems like amauter scam from the first sight, also this website seems to be Vietnamese originated and I'm not sure about the gambling regulations over there (if any).

Better late than sorry...