Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!

Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Blue_Angel

#241
I was wondering if you'd run again the same amount of results for both, stop after 1 and stop after 2 losses, would you found the same again??
It could be coincidental that stopping after 2 instead of 1 loss came out on top.
You should run simulations again because it doesn't make sense, why is better?

Parlaying wins is a way to make your wins count more, personally I'd not expect to win only with flat bets a negative expectation game.
#242
But how about parlaying wins up to the point where you have recoup any losses and reach new bankroll high?
#243
@ Ozon,
I've 2 suggestions which could improve the overall picture:

1) Stop after 1 loss and restart after 1 virtual win

2) When you have drawdown parlay your wins up to the win which will create a new bankroll high, then bet 1 unit and don't parlay if you have no drawdown.
#244
Thanks for sharing.  8)
#245
Gizmotron / Re: For alrelax
May 14, 2017, 02:36:58 AM
Hallelujah!  O:-)
#246
Bally's Blog / Re: What's new / update.
May 14, 2017, 02:18:16 AM
Really interesting, I believe the clusters phenomenon is the way to go, well done Bally!
I've busted my bankroll in the past 3 times by playing LOT systems, one was by chasing repeats from 1st spin till one day came out 18 uniques in 18 spins!
Another time, while I was charting on the roulette table, I've noticed 18 uniques , despite that I was preparing for another method, I've bet those 18 numbers and won at once.
Also I've seen 22 uniques in 22 spins on my testings from single 0 wheels.

The 2nd buster occurred when I was going for just one 3-peater within 37 spins, the funny thing was that I had tested the specific method for about 50,000 spins before I begun betting for real at brick & mortar casino.
First day I won and on my second visit I've the incredible luck to encounter 18 doubles without a single 3-peater, of course the 3-peater has arrived during the 45th spin, this supposed has 1.5% chance.

The 3rd buster happened when I was expecting just one repeat from 30th up to and including 37th spin, the whole cycle had 30 uniques and all of the 7 repeats happened before the 30th spin.

I do understand that stuff could happen, but like these...?
One last thing before I go, the common element for all 3 BR busts I had was that they occurred while playing airball roulettes...
#247
@Dlay, Victor is a qualified programmer and could help you understand the technical details better than I could explained it to you.
Of course, if there isn't a continuous shuffler present at the Baccarat table, makes this scenario irrelevant, but RG spoke about machines.

I've noticed a disturbing trend, unfortunately there are only few individuals who create something new and unique but the majority imitates and copies, as a result a lot of useless information is being recycled for years, if not decades.
The progress in the right direction of knowledge and perception is being delayed significantly.
My methods perhaps not all so good but are mine and not a bad imitation, there is no competition for the Nobel prize but expressions of philosophies, perceptions.
Is this something which we can evaluate objectively or subjectively??
In my point of view there is objective reality, deceptive reality (intentionally) and misleading reality (unintentionally).
Therefore all come down to each person's judgement in order to separate the wheat from the chalk...in any way, the choice is yours.
There is no excuse such as someone told me to do so because the final decision is yours, you might choose right or wrong and whether you win or lose it's thanks to you.
#248
Quote from: RouletteGhost on May 02, 2017, 12:18:53 PM
everyone rode the streak...
I've seen people win thousands on electronic roulette...

In general I consider good to do otherwise rather than following the majority...just mpov.
#249
Quotethe players can wager either side

I agree but why not bet pass/don't pass instead of player/banker, on craps you could set and influence the dice in such way which makes a difference on the results.
For example there is a combination of bets which make you win with 34 out of 36 possible permutations of the dice, if you could avoid the 2 losing permutations by dice setting then each and every roll provides profit.

Quoteand second, when the shoe is cut there is always a change in any pre-set make up the deck could have had.

Yes, but not so big change. 

QuoteAs well, I have witnessed just as many perfect shoes, streak/runs or huge sections of chop-chop with auto shufflers as manually shuffling.

I don't doubt about it.

QuoteAlso, why would some multi billion dollar corporations risk immediate revocation of their license?

First, not all of them are in the multi billion sphere, second, if you have indications but not evidence you can do nothing legally, which is what it matters.
It's almost impossible to get evidence, hidden cameras and other similar gadgets don't even have the chance to get inside, so what you left with is just your word and as you might understand this means nothing legally.
#250
QuoteSo how rigged is it?

It doesn't have to be, but it could be.
I prefer dealers rather than airballs.
#251
Quote from: ADulay on May 02, 2017, 04:44:26 AM
And just how are they "arranged"?

AD


You should know better after all these years, I didn't expect to receive this respond from someone like you.
Just a friendly tip, the best way to decide what to bet is to wait to see where the most money have been bet and then bet the opposite.
If you are the only person at the table then good luck...!
#252
Quote from: RouletteGhost on May 02, 2017, 01:37:07 AM
Really interested to know how exactly vdw is played on baccarat

New local casino opened with baccarat machines. Real cards

Don't play those machines because they arrange the sequence of the cards, actually don't play neither pre-shuffled decks which bring them on the tables.
Play only with the good old fashioned way when shuffling was manually in front of you.
Unfortunately under the excuse of making the game faster, they've invented these shady tactics.
At least on Baccarat you could bet either way but on Blackjack is real slaughterhouse!
#254
Quote from: ADulay on April 26, 2017, 04:22:31 PM
BA,

  Would you care to explain why a streak of 10 or a streak of chops is a bad thing?

  It would be even better if you could explain why it is bad under the VDW play.

  Thanks.

  AD


Try to see the greater picture, by discarding possible outcomes just because you've observed the last few results won't make your predictions better because what you discard it's still there.

It's like you are claiming that by knowing binomial probability you know what's coming up next, this is absurd don't you think?

The only solution is a progression regarding EC bets.
#255
Probably a waste of time with flat bets, how about mixing it with Albahala's money management?