Quote from: Mr J on September 03, 2016, 04:03:18 PM
You have a ways to go kid.

Ken

I'm pretending I didn't see that.

Borderline Troll or Patrol I don't give a dime!

Quote from: Gizmotron on September 04, 2016, 02:52:37 PM

I'm beginning to form the opinion that you are at least a borderline Troll. 

You may assume what you want.

QuoteDo I need to spell that out for you?

Yes please!

Quote from: Gizmotron on September 04, 2016, 02:22:22 PM

Let's see, I deliberately posted here in other people's threads as to make it difficult to find my information in the first place, and BTW I told everyone that I did it that way on purpose. Here is a clue. Go to my member page and click on my posts. Ha Ha, there's more than a thousand of them. See if that buzz is the right frequency?


Let's look at this frequency too. My students are not having any trouble comprehending me. What's up with that?

That's purely misdirection...afterall you are just a skilled craftsman.

Quote from: Gizmotron on September 04, 2016, 02:09:47 PM

Try starting with this, this makes me a mathBoy I guess, there are no variables that effect any outcome. You might be talking about physics though, but I don't think that you are. Nothing causes randomness to occur other than chance. I suspect that you have some kind of magical belief regarding the unknown.

You may assume what you want.

QuoteWhat's your excuse?

I've none.
You could only be understood by minds of similar frequency.

Quote from: Gizmotron on September 04, 2016, 01:21:40 PM

Wow, so you possess the skill to define what I'm suggesting for years is an advantage. Doing so gives you what? You have nothing. I'm sort of impressed by how impressed you are with yourself though. That's somewhat entertaining.


Try this: "there have to be consistent tendencies instead of coincidental random events." Does it ever occur to you that both exist at the same time and that magic Elves are never the cause of these coincidences that can be easily observed to the trained eye? I've dealt with mathboys for years that there can't be a cause for patterns or trends to exist and that they never predict any future results. So I always classify opportunities as coincidence. I can claim skill no matter what you say I can't do.

The cause for patterns is randomness and random consists of all the unknown variables.
If we knew all variables which affect every outcome there would be not random, thus just a lack of knowledge.
The true nature of randomness is that there is no random at all, quite paradox but true, only because of our gap of perception exists.
Perception evolves as knowledge grows.

You can make that amount or more per session instead of per student, anyway, it's your choice.
When you said what you left under our noses it was a deliberate mistake...people look but don't see...

QuoteIt's all here if you can put it together on your own.

Gizmo

Actually you have not revealed everything...

QuoteI'm saying that a coincidence of randomness some times presents a state of opportunity irregardless of the over all probability and the odds for an independent spin.

Gizmotron

If you perceive it as mere coincidence, then you are just lucky when you are winning, thus you possess no skill of ''reading'' randomness as you claim.

In order to be valid what you are claiming for years, there have to be consistent tendencies instead of coincidental random events.

Coincidence suggests luck/random, consistent tendencies suggest reliable patterns.
So Gizmo, you cannot claim any skill unless there is something more than random coincidences.

QuoteIf you were making a bet on whether 24 numbers would hit over the next 37 spins, then it has more legs.

I agree with that statement Mike, by the way, are you Michael Sackleford?

QuoteGive me ANY system based on the law of the third and I'll show you it's no better than betting randomly.

Mike

Could you please check the attachment?

QuoteIf you deny it and say they ARE effective, on what basis are they effective? is there another kind of 'connection' we don't know about? and why doesn't it seem to hold whenever we do any empirical testing?

Mike

On Law Of Thirds basis.
There are, the fact you are not aware of them doesn't equates with the fact that they don't exist.
Gravity existed long before humanity realized that we are not living at a flat planet, didn't need human's appreciation to faction.
Because you see only what you want to see, aka confirmation bias.
One day we'll eventually realize that there are much more to learn and embrace which, right now, are beyond our field of perception.
A theory's lifespan ends with the beginning of a new one, that's what history has taught us this far.
In other words, it's correct as long as we don't evolve our knowledge.

QuoteAwww, he wasn't all that bad. Never ripped me of nuffin'. Quite a lovable character after all's said.

GG

Perhaps because he didn't have the chance to do otherwise.

I'm glad we are setting things straight, keep the ball rolling, or should I say spinning.

Quote from: Steve H on September 03, 2016, 12:49:54 PM
Yes we had some fun times roadkill cactus

Have you heard the other with the Bigfoot...?!