Quote from: Albalaha on July 31, 2016, 03:18:26 PM
Just blaming people with the knowledge of maths offer no solution as they can prove themselves right again and again while you can not prove the same. Mathematics of gambling, the house edge, variance etc won't change for you, you need to change other aspects of the strategy that have been killing the player. Ironically, people like to redo fallacy based ideas than thinking something out of box. Martingale did not work 300 years back and won't work after 3000 more years.

What everyone has to realize is that gravity didn't wait humanity to understands how it works in order to be valid...

It doesn't pick any 35 random numbers, but bets against the last 2 frozen numbers.

In order to lose it has to hit those 2 frozen numbers back to back, in 2 consecutive spins!!

Those 2  frozen numbers could be missing for hundreds of spins and suddenly will arrive 1 after the other?!

I didn't say that it will never lose BUT that the profit will overcome its losses.

Does anyone want to simulate 1,000,000 results or more?

Please be my guest!

I WANT TO PLAY A GAME!




LCF -HAHAHAHAHA!!!

LCF -Black OR Red ?? The choice is yours!

DG -Black??
     What was that?! Bloody Reeeeeeeeed!!!!!!!

LCF -If you don't estimate your bankroll,you don't deserve it!
       HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Grab a pen and a paper and write down each number that hits, alternatively write all numbers from 0 to 36 and each time a number hits cross it out or circle it with your pen.

Continue to do so till there are only 2 numbers remaining which have not appeared yet, at that time bet everything else except these two numbers, for only one spin.

It costs mostly in time, but a guaranteed 2.8% return on your investment.

Cheers, to your success!

J. Laurie Snell




R. D ELLISON



DO YOU HAVE THE POWER TO BREAK THE BOUNDS OF FALLACY??!


J. Kavouras








THESE ARE THE 4 PILLARS OF A WINNING BET!



ROULETTE TERMINOLOGY

Doubling up:


Team play:



Proposition bets:
It's when the dealer proposes what you should bet

Lucky dip:
Automatic air ball machines placing your money to 5 random numbers (they were thinking of a special bet named "hand me your money" but it was to blunt)

CASINO ETIQUETTE

Why card counting on baccarat does not work?

What is the definition of the "Holy Grail" for you?

Is it something which never loses a bet? a session? within a week maybe?

A method which could lose some sessions could be overall more profitable than a method which never loses!

So what's exactly is the definition of HG??

Intuitive improvisation is the secret of genius...!

Have you ever thought if a casino's board and or staf were reading all these posts, what would they think??

"A bunch of lo..ers who  think they can win our games!"

Am I wrong thinking this way??

Quote from: TheLaw on July 30, 2016, 11:02:37 PM
I agree......but at what point are these "ideas" just more noise without actual testing.

I criticize those who throw out methods as if their success is a foregone conclusion without public testing...........and this is very common on these boards.

It would save everyone a great deal of time if they would follow-through (like Nickmsi is doing) with transparent public testing.........instead of all of these "hypothetical" systems.

Keep in mind.......I am the one who posted one of your publicly tested methods on other boards to get the word out.........so this is nothing personal.

Yes, I know, but there are trolls and persons who "borned yesterday" being born every minute...

Doesn't surprise you even after so many years that some are recycling the same again and again?

If old known methods worked, would we still on the lookout?

If the HG was a simple task, would that being already achieved by now?

What I'm trying to say is that we should not look backwards if we want to go forward  and we have to think beyond the mainstream frames, outside the box.

Quote from: albertojonas on July 30, 2016, 10:50:55 PM
both events have same probability and you're grown enough to accept that

You want to tell me that 50-0 for the banker against the player is EQUALLY POSSIBLE with 25 VS 25 ??!

ARE YOU KIDDING ME?! 

Condemning other persons' methods is much easier than being productive by creating your own and providing solutions to yourself and to the forum.

"This method is stuff, that system is failure...etc"

But who benefits from this kind of information??

Instead of blasting methods, aka efforts of other individuals, why don't we try to focus on what's working.

Personally I don't tolerate any criticism by persons who provide next to nothing but criticism!

Quote from: TheLaw on July 30, 2016, 10:19:55 PM
Simply amazing how much people can debate.........with no evidence.

Publicly Test your method......as Nickmsi did......or your theories are worthless........literally worthless in this game.

It never ceases to amaze me how much people love to debate roulette.........until someone calls their bluff.

"Oh Yeah! I've got a method that works........easy........just do X, Y, and Z"

Sounds good......let's run some tests.

"_____"(crickets)

Hello?

"_____"(crickets)............................................................Yawn.

Speaking about "crickets", you should have tried a lot through the years, right?

Let me put it another way, I bet always same as last decision and I'm having the incredible "luck" to have 50 consecutive decisions going on alternating fashion (choppy) like this:  B P B P B P...etc
Even if it seems extremely rare to impossible to occur such event, at the end is just 25 decisions for the player and 25 for the banker which reflects precisely the 50/50 probability of the events.
On the other hand, if I was betting always the same side would it be possible to have 50 consecutive for the other side??
I think you got my point, both of these situations seems almost unrealistic, but in the first case, after all what happened was a 50/50 distribution, what's odd with what probability theory dictates?!

Quote from: Gizmotron on July 30, 2016, 08:55:22 PM
It's true that no bet selection, either guess or mechanical based rule can produce an edge. But both of these types of bet selections can produce favorable coincidences of opportunity that are exploitable by a prepared expert. These large number tests show that there are more favorable times to use short termed progressions.

If you are to favor a moment for a progression then you might as well favor positive progression's characteristics.

Just offering something to think about here.

There are progressions which raise after a loss and progressions which raise after a win, but does win/loss ratio follow a specific order??

I think an efficient and effective money management should be focused on the totals, it's one thing to say 3 out of 10 and completely another to say when those 3 wins are going to happen within the 10 trials.