Quote from: tdx on March 20, 2016, 05:30:58 PM


Looks like a standard martingale  or negative progression. Your last bet would be $ 187,800 if you were betting          $ 100 a  unit in baccarat.

I think even Bill Gates would begin to sweat that bet.

That's true my friend, but can you do better with such bad results??

Quote from: Albalaha on March 20, 2016, 03:39:58 PM
This is the first one. Please go ahead.

R=result B=bet T=total ME=minimum expectation
R         B          T        ME
L         1         -1        25
L         1         -2        25
L         1         -3        25
W        1        -2         24
L         1        -3         24
L         1        -4         24
L         1        -5         24
L         1        -6         24
L         1        -7         24
L         1        -8         24
W        1       -7          23
L         1       -8          23
W        1       -7          22
L         1       -8          22
L         1       -9          22
W        1      -8           21
L         1      -9           21
L         1      -10         21
W        1      -9           20
L         1      -10         20
L         1      -11         20
L         1      -12         20
W        1      -11         19
L         1      -12         19
L         1      -13         19
L         1      -14         19
L         1      -15         19
L         1      -16         19
L         1      -17         19
L         1      -18         19
L         1      -19         19
L         2      -21         38
L         2      -23         38
L         2      -25         38
L         2      -27         38
L         2      -29         38
L         2      -31         38
W        2      -29         36
L         2      -31         36
L         2      -33         36
L         2      -35         36
W        2      -33         34
L         2      -35         34
L         3      -38         51
W        3      -35         48
L         3      -38         48
W        3      -35         45
L         3      -38         45
L         3      -41         45
W        3      -38         42
L         3      -41         42
L         3      -44         42
W        4      -40         52
L         4      -44         52
L         4      -48         52
W        4      -44         48
L         4      -48         48
L         5      -53         60
L         5      -58         60
W        5      -53         55
L         5      -58         55
L         6      -64         66
W        6      -58         60
L         6      -64         60
L         7      -71         70
L         8      -79         80
W        8     -71          72
L         8     -79          72
L         9     -88          81
W       10     -78         80
L        10     -88         80
L        12     -100       96
W       13     -87         91
L        13     -100       91
L        15     -115      105
L        17     -132      119
L        19     -151      133
L        22     -173      154
W       25     -148      150
L        25     -173      150
L        29     -202      174
L        34     -236      204
L        40     -276      240
W       47     -229      235
W       47     -182      188
L        47     -229      188
L        58     -287      232
L        72     -359      288
L        90     -449      360
L        113    -562     452
L        141    -703     564
W       176    -527     528
L        176    -703     528
L        235    -938     705
W       313    -625     626
L        313    -938     626
W       470    -468     470
L        470    -938     470
L        939    -1877    939
W      1878    +1        0

albalaha, earn it, sum it or whatever your name is,

1) Post a session with 25 wins out of 100 results and distribute those wins and losses anyway you like.

2) Post a session with 66 wins out of 200 results and distribute those wins and losses anyway you like.

Then I'll show you what's the meaning of this topic.

Are you ready?

I'm waiting...

You have an opinion like everyone else, everyone can judge for themselves.

I'm afraid we are derailing this topic so I'll stop responding to topic non relevant messages.

Thank you for the encouragement, really apreaciated it.

By the way, I remembered when spoke with Janus, the creator of GUT, and he expressed his dissapoitment because not only of some trolls who are free-roaming, but also about the eagerness of many individuals for pointless arguments and not feedback, testing, analysis, constructive suggestions...etc

Unfortunately he left forums for such reasons, it's a shame not to be team players and not to work together towards our mutual interest.

A unified brain could achieve much more than a lot of smaller ones, if you block the knowledge by not sharing it you are framing its evolution.

Trust and you'll be trusted, give and you'll get.

Quote from: Bally6354 on March 09, 2016, 01:10:57 PM
Vic,

The typing is a lot easier. Not as many cursor freeze ups so far when typing a reply. I quite like the look of the new layout. More modern and a cleaner look. Good job! 

Regardless of the layout, the most important has been improved significantly, I'm talking about the freezing screens.
So yes, I agree with Bally.

Quote from: Albalaha on March 12, 2016, 11:18:44 AM
There is nothing like trends or patterns or "going with the wind" or "going against the wind" in a game of pure randomness.

No betselection can outsmart randomness or lessen the house edge or the volatility of variance.

http://albalaha.lefora.com/topic/19400641/like-patterns-random-game-help#.VuP4H3197IU

  To showcase this, I simulated entire zuma 1600 baccarat removing Tie which has nearly 114k bets. I did them with 5 kind of betselections like betting the last, betting the opposite last, betting before last and switching at certain losses. All performed almost equally and each had good, bad, average and extreme streaks.

http://albalaha.lefora.com/topic/11104358/5-different-kind-bet-selections-perform-zumma-1600#.VuP50X197IU

Come out of the fanciful illusions of pattern playing or "identifying the running pattern" or "current flow" of randomness. They do exist in our wishful thinking only. They do not help in real world.

Every time I'm posting something your reply is against my post, I say black you say white, I say white you say black, what's your problem with me?!

Baccarat is different from roulette and you are replying to a topic about columns betting on American roulette wheel which happens to be at roulette forum.

If you need to boast about your ''I know everything'' attitude, make your own topic and post there whatever you want.
In the meantime don't condemn every effort which being made towards a different path than yours.

Do you expect everyone to agree with your biased views and congratulate you on the same time?!
You (think) know better than anyone?
Fine, just use what you know to win and let the rest of us who we are inferior than you to lose, it's our problem after all!

Quote from: Albalaha on March 12, 2016, 04:27:04 AM
I say, there is no better bet selection. Only a time could be favorable for a bet or against it. A bet itself has no advantage attached in it.

I hate to admit that once more you are correct, not because I've to agree but because it's the reality.
However, this is what I wanted to say but didn't express it properly.
Didn't mean that, for example, numbers 17 and 26 are always better bet than others, but I meant that betting WITH the flow and NOT AGAINST it is the best possible selection, the rest is MM.

Quote from: Mike on March 11, 2016, 07:40:37 AM
I don't get it. Why would anyone want to play the 00 wheel when the house edge is double the Euro wheel?   

The fact that you may have discovered some "interesting" correspondences between the wheel and the layout doesn't make any sector more likely to hit than any other. I can't see why this is "exciting". Somebody please enlighten me.

That's correct, I think the topic initiated by an old post from someone who was claiming indirectly that he found the "holy grail".

My personal opinion is that following clues which are based completely on vague claims from unknown individuals has a very good possibility to be misleading.

Quote from: Albalaha on March 11, 2016, 06:43:27 AM
A choppy session would always bring ONLY losses if we do that.
LWLWLWLWLWLW

That's true but you do recognize  that there are better bet selections and not everything is the same, right?

If you are worrying about losing streaks just stop after 1 loss and continue when your selection hits again.

What if we make two combinations of bets?

1) Red, Odd, 2nd column

2) Black, Even, 3rd column

Bally,

I've used your system on RX and it's one of the most resilient!

QuoteI use RTM and law of large numbers and an MM that can pass through the worst possible without eating too many chips.

This what I'm doing with my "Fallacious Holy Grail"

When I was at Vegas I was able to find American wheels from 0.25 inside/ 5$ total at Downtown and there was even with 0.1 at Henderson, Nevada.
European wheels are offering only a handful of casinos and their table limit starts from 10$ (total), but 25$ is the average and on weekends or private rooms reaches 100$ per spin.
In other words at Vegas is much more easier to play on American wheels.