Many years have passed since the foundation of the game and still people around the world are in their individual quest for discovering the holy grail.
We have to ask ourselves; Is it realistic expectation or is it vanity??
What exactly do you expect to find and what is the definition of reality for you?
Along the long path of history, knowledge has been evolved, therefore perception has been shaped accordingly.
When perception changes, your reality is changing..."the world you be is the world you see..."
By understanding a partial reality I'm not influencing the whole of what is real, nor any of its parts.
What I actually change is my angle of perception, in other words the level of my consciousness/awareness.
While no single existing system has perpetually succeed to cease all of the so-called "loopholes", each one of all those "loopholes" has been blocked in by at least one system.
By maintaining a two dimensional mentality in a three dimensional world you are framing yourself.
The champions of mainstream theory support that each and every result is independent from the previous.
Probably you have heard: "roulette has no memory" and every time I recall it I lough very hard!
So, if you ask me, I'd respond that there is correlation between outcomes and this does not have to do with memory!
So who's right and who's wrong?? My answer is EVERYONE and NO ONE!
Everyone partially, up to a certain extend, but no one completely!
In my point of view, no one can comprehend the full "picture" because it's too big and regarding your approach you see only a different part of the whole.
If we were to interpret this generic theory in roulette terms, one could not satisfy all parameters with a single method.
Like Greek ancient philosopher Heracletus said: "The only constant (in universe) is change (evolution)
So when some see only randomness in action, I see the chain reactions unfolding before my eyes...
I hope to contribute for a greater degree of understanding the facts.
We have to ask ourselves; Is it realistic expectation or is it vanity??
What exactly do you expect to find and what is the definition of reality for you?
Along the long path of history, knowledge has been evolved, therefore perception has been shaped accordingly.
When perception changes, your reality is changing..."the world you be is the world you see..."
By understanding a partial reality I'm not influencing the whole of what is real, nor any of its parts.
What I actually change is my angle of perception, in other words the level of my consciousness/awareness.
While no single existing system has perpetually succeed to cease all of the so-called "loopholes", each one of all those "loopholes" has been blocked in by at least one system.
By maintaining a two dimensional mentality in a three dimensional world you are framing yourself.
The champions of mainstream theory support that each and every result is independent from the previous.
Probably you have heard: "roulette has no memory" and every time I recall it I lough very hard!
So, if you ask me, I'd respond that there is correlation between outcomes and this does not have to do with memory!
So who's right and who's wrong?? My answer is EVERYONE and NO ONE!
Everyone partially, up to a certain extend, but no one completely!
In my point of view, no one can comprehend the full "picture" because it's too big and regarding your approach you see only a different part of the whole.
If we were to interpret this generic theory in roulette terms, one could not satisfy all parameters with a single method.
Like Greek ancient philosopher Heracletus said: "The only constant (in universe) is change (evolution)
So when some see only randomness in action, I see the chain reactions unfolding before my eyes...
I hope to contribute for a greater degree of understanding the facts.