Mike does it take more then 60.000 placed bets or less to show that the game has negative expectation and for the house edge to kick in.
For example 1.35% house edge on the EC position.

Cheers

I have a book that code different staking plans with 1.7% house edge with 60.000 placed bets and show positiv results using specific rules and observations.
So i think any system can be coded.

I get what you are saying and i read about other pro gamblers mention the same thing, when you find the sweet spot you will notice that you are within the sweet spot and should quit and get out.
It has nothing to do with educated guess work or trading. Its all about to define when you are ahead and quit. How can some one quit and being ahead if they don't know the meaning of being ahead.
So if we would run 100 shoes and the common peak for most shoes together was +3 units - then we would know that is the sweet spot. Now some shoes will make +20 units but is not important as we want to know what 75% (or more) of the shoes peaks are together. Then the same principal works for the average sweet losing sequence and among does you look at best and worst results.

Should also mention that i understand your way of thinking when you say that if you not reach goal being ahead or jump on board the sweet spot and have played half the shoe you might aim to break even or accept small loss. The distance from winning +3 units is the same distance from -3 units to break even when you look towards variance and fluctation.

Now i got personal reviews on your book and the material as i understand are for beginners.

Cheers

Thanks Mike ,,, i pm two members who has the book to get personal opinion ,,, one of them is a old member with good baccarat knowledge ,,, i assume that is better insight then amazon reviews ...

Cheers

Jimske i join BTC and read about NOR strategy and is not a scam - it based upon same work i have done with Sputniks March that have 3K views and i have develop the methodology further with out posting about it. My method is similar towards NOR and using three states wish is better then any known patten betting with or against.
When you have three state you can explore a real bias that can last for one or several shoes where you win and break even. Do you know why one state strategy has the name S40 by Ellis? he won 40 shoes in a row using it and that explain it all.

Looking at the random bits as states that unfold is more effective then any other public known baccarat strategy.
Now i don't recommend any one to join BTC if you don't want to expand your mind or read my topic.

I have read bad and negative comments about Ellis new baccarat forum and would not pay 1K for membership as i reckon is not worth it after reading pro reviews at BTC.
At least at BTC you can join for one month and download NOR and read topics about the particular method and quit for only 30$ and then i would say is worth it if you are stuck with patterns.

Cheers

Mike ,,, what do you mean with fake review ? when i read the three reviews on amzon i can see that they buy papper edition and all three give it five stars.
One review mention testing it against 500 shoes with good results and i assume all is done flat betting.

So how are does fake reviews ?

Now two members at the topic Stephen R. Tabone started mention good reviews about his methodology.
How do you explain that!

Cheers

What happen to Stephen R. Tabone topic about his book?

Cheers

Nice Winnings Kimo Li - that is hard core :-)

Cheers

----

Hello Stephen Tabone - you have made a nice introduction of your self and your book and got a nice review from the member Adulay (who i respect) when he compare it with Ellis S40 he and you catch my attention.
That has to do with singles at a first level of understanding, then comes the option how to tackle series of two, three and four and higher, when to enter and follow or bet against.
I like this kind of methodology very much so i decide to buy your book.

Cheers

Thanks for your reply stephen tabone

One last question, what size of bankroll do you recommend using your strategy is it above or below 5000 Euro ...

Cheers

Hello stephen tabone and welcome to forum.

Stephen is it really so hard to win and know the secret?
I mean any one can simulate several 100 trail session and look at peaks and drawdowns and reversals.

Reversals is when you have a negative result and get back to even or a small profit, during 100 session samples you get at average 2 reversals.
Now assume i peak 2 units with 75% of my shoes.
Then i only need to solve the average drawdown and when to let the reversal to kick in if getting a bad start at the shoe.

Now is your way in your book more complex or does it involve the same way tackle baccarat?

It would be nice if you could mention something making it worth to buy your book.
Is the secret within money managment or selection methods.

I assume all selection method is the same, so is more a question to define when you are ahead during a certain amount of played trails and quit playing.
That way you can be ahead and stay away from the sequence from hell as you would not jump on board that train.

Just opinions and would like to hear your comments.

Cheers

When i read this kind of topics i get very curios who is behind them, the number has no connection or methodology for betting them and you add progression upon that.
Pretty silly.

Same as most post at this junk forum, one selection method with one staking plan and that's it.
Upon that you mention a 2000 unit bank, so if the minimum is 2.5 Euro for one unit you will have 5K, who has that and who would risk 5K upon does lines you wrote above with that silly method?

There is something wrong with this perspective.
I have ten fingers and less has that kind of money of gambling, if you take 1000 members, then 99% will take a small amount of salary and visit casino during weekend and maybe 1% has 5K or more as bankroll for gamling.

This is so common error with this message boards.

Cheers

norcosoft dot com

he program RX code for around 40/50$ and code bots and other things ...

Cheers

I like the videos very much and i will try to rap my mind around the method - thanks for sharing ...

Cheers

Assume you bet against and not a bias ...
I was thinking that you see for example 321 then when you have 32 then you play 2 and 3 with one single bet - so you betting against 321 formation to repeat four times in a row.
321 321 321 321 So you wait for each pattern to hit once before betting against it using three attempts.

Cheers