I try exactly the same thing - but using the EC and clustering the events into 1 in 3 and using same Matrix - it can explore two options - bet for a bias or bet against for events to repeat
(as with your example)

333 a
331 b
332 c

311 a
312 b
313 c

322 a
321 b
323 c

- - -

222 a
221 b
223 c

211 a
212 b
213 c 

233 a
232 b
231 c

- - -

111 a
112 b
113 c   

122 a
121 b
123 c   

133 a
131 b
132 c

WOW Adulay is that played shoes? or real live score cards?

Cheers

I don't agree - my opinion is that you jump on board domination or trends with three of four attempts and if you don't strike you quit and start over.

Cheers

Yes Ozon i could read the chat :-)
Ozon i test using Regression Up & Pull with one dozen to repeat and two dozen as a HEDGE BET to break even and start over.

First bet has 33% and the secound 66% ...
I don't know if you should continue with the last hit if all Three show or wait for a ficitive win - but the results looks good.

If you want to know the selection method you can PM me and we can talk private - also work as EC bet and HEDGE with two dozen.

Ozon whish country are you from ...
I from Sweden.

Cheers

Ozon i feel you are on the right track and you should continue to follow that path.
If you master Regression Up & Pull you sure is a true gambler in my book

Hello GGasoft - I have search the internet for Parachute methods and find material - I wonder if you have a secret to share with my and I keep it private - ask VLS we go long time back.
You can PM me or I can PM you and i hope you have time as i am a serious gambler with decent bankroll.

I am at a cut Point where I want to move from 5 digit bankroll to 6 digit bankroll and start travelling around Europa.
During this year I will have 6 digit bankroll.

Cheers

Well i feel that you are on the right track - i Always test varios ways using Regression Up & Pull.
With your example above i belive that the strike ratio for domination compensate for the loses.

I have John Patricks Sport Handicap Ebook - but i did not have time or understand the lingo for different aspects.
Also experimenting with Roulette solutions and try to convert them into Sport betting.

Nice to see that you like Regression Up & Pull.

Nice approch.

Cheers

Not saying 2 events in the past 3 spins.
PM me and i will give you a link that explain how you can clustering EC into same distribution with the odds and probability 1 in 3.

Cheers

Exactly!  There is no 'prediction' that can prevail past a section/shoe/a couple of shoes here and there.  The key to it all, is hit and run, or bang it out big time when it is there, etc., etc., and so on. 

I don't agree, i use prediction with succés. Clustering EC into 1 in 3 probability. EC distribution with same distribution as dozen with bias/domination. Very common to see two events out of Three hitting 5. 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, times in a row.
Don't see past clustering results as gamblers fallacy, i see them as a Dice with odds and probability.

Here is one example that 8 Clustering Entering poinsts has bias/domination where only one combination fail.

333 a x
331 b xx
332 c

311 a xx
312 b x
313 c

322 a
321 b xx
323 c

- - -

222 a
221 b xx
223 c

211 a xx
212 b x
213 c 

233 a
232 b
231 c xx

- - -

111 a
112 b xx
113 c x 

122 a x
121 b xx
123 c   

133 a x
131 b x
132 c x

Its easy to win when you use Dice as your benchmark and ride on sleepers to contine to sleep and put your Money on domination/repeats/bias.
But most don't understand the complexitiy behind clustering and using a Dice as benchmark for EC.

Quote from: plolp on December 04, 2016, 01:40:01 PM
Beautiful video

But very naive method  !!! 

I don't find it naive, one method have been coded and tested upon similiar principals.
See above with serie of five, the math add up.

For example assume you use a trigger of two and do some observations charting and tracking, then you will ask your self how you can win hitting does long strikes where they hovering within series of five.
Pick one colour, for example RED and each time you get a serie of two or three you write a minus sign -
Each time you hit a serie of four you make a equal sign =
And each time you encounter a series of five or higher you write a plus sign +

Then the result might look like this - - - - = - + - = + - - - = - - - - - = = = - - - = - + - - - + - + - - - = = - = - - - - - - +
This is a Eye opener why is some times is a good idea betting against the Wheel, even Brett Morton parly his way to winning that way.

CHeers

I would like to advance as gambler and don't master Pocker - where could i learn - been thinking to buy John Patricks Pocker E-book.
And is there a online RNG game where you can practice on.

At the moment Sport betting and Roulette is my main games.

Cheers

Nice :-)

Cheers

 Well this is how the results looks like testing a clustering method based upon that idea - pretty cool ...

- 175
+ 77
+ 62
+ 13
+ 15
+ 56
+ 13
+ 20
+ 23
+ 53
+ 34
+ 2
+ 29
- 175
+ 19
+ 25
+ 59
+ 25
+ 22
+ 14
+ 80