Now i start to experiment with progressions only MM without any kind of bet selection.
Just notice last outcome and play, no tracking at all.

So far i only find one way and its for EC - playing each and every trail.
Is like following a march or algorithm.

Any one playing this way?

Cheers

I like roulette and today i am in a good mood :-)
Also testing if you can move two lines ...

                                                                                                                         More text and more waste of forum space...

Mike, does he talk about advantage play only or do he talk about all games in general - including system players.

Cheers

I like the writing very much.

Thanks.

Cheers

How does the progression look like?
I test with 1 and 3 and got pretty good results.

Cheers

Do any one else have a method with low variance, low bet amount and hovering around zero point.
Then feel free to post method at this topic.

cheers

The minium for the lines are 2 Euro - that means 8 Euro for each bet.
The outside bets has 10 Euro as minimum and that would be 20 Euro.

Cheers

 This method is by TurboGenius and i like the method very much.
One reason is that you need no tracking and it is easy to play.

You track the last four dozen that hit and bet against them on a rolling basis.

2.
3.
3.
3.
2 L.
2 W.   
2 W.   
1 W.   
1 W.   
2 L.
1 W.   
2 W.   
1 L.   
1 W.   
3 W.   
1 W.   
1 L.   
2 W.   
1 W.   
3 W.   
2 W.   
2 L.
1 L.   
1 W.   
2 L.   
1 W.   
1 L.   
2 W.   
3 W.   
3 W.   
1 L.   
3 W.   
3 L.   
1 W.   
2 W.
2 W.
1 W.
2 W.
1 W.
1 W.
2 W.
2 L.
3 W.
2 W.
3 W.
2 L.
3 L.
1 W
3 L
1 W
1 W
1
1
2
2
1
2

I want to play and have a reason standing next to the wheel starring at it.
Then i been thinking about this method.

But a 4 step marty would be to agressive for my taste, so i was thinking to use one skip and flat betting the first two bets and raise the last one.
I want to play as much i can and lose as little i can during that time standing next to the wheel starring at it and collecting data.


1:1
1:1
2:2

That way i win with my first bet and accept loses with my secound and last bet.
The idea is that first bet and secound bet will hovering around break even territorium.
As first wins one unit and the secound lose one unit.

WWWWLWWWWWWLWW


2.
3.
3.
3.
2 L.
2 W. +1
2 W.
1 W.
1 W.
2 L.
1 W. +2
2 W.
1 L.
1 W. +3
3 W.
1 W.
1 L.
2 W. +4
1 W.
3 W.
2 W.
2 L.
1 L. +2
1 W. +3
2 L.
1 W. +4
1 L.
2 W. +5
3 W.
3 W.
1 L.
3 W. +6
3 L.
1 W. +7
2 W.
2 W.
1 W.
2 W.
1 W.
1 W.
2 W.
2 L.
3 W. +8
2 W.
3 W.
2 L.
3 L. +6
1 W  +7
3 L
1 W  +8
1 W
1
1
2
2
1
2
3



Quote from: Mr J on January 10, 2015, 06:13:49 PM
@anyone reading this >> The issue is.....some people don't know the difference between debating and insulting.

If you don't know the difference, not my problem. Its your problem and I will fix it.

Ken

Stop talking and fix it - what are you waiting for?

I start to read rouletteforum cc more and more - i don't feel this is a gambling forum any more - this forum has become a blog spot for some users and kindergarden for others.

 I think it is a great function that a member can use Self moderating.

Cheers

I was curve fitting and miss match results ...

Cheers

Quote from: Rashid on January 06, 2015, 06:03:12 PM
care to explain the bet selection?

No - but i send it to does i trust to let them test and see for them self.

Cheers

Sure, but i have never seen anything like this before.
104 placed bets and 84 wins is 6.83 Z-score.

Maybe i am curve fitting - i have to ask Bayes - its to good to be true.

I will only do 300 trails and now i reach 4.83 Z-zcore, i have never done that before.
And hitting 8 9 10 11 12 13 in a row is also pretty rare strike ratio.

If it holds up - then i will ask Bayes to code it ...

I will continue testing and if it hold up - then i will ask Bayes to check the method - so there is no curve fitting.