Quote from: Priyanka on August 14, 2013, 01:08:20 AM
Thanks Sputnik. 2-6 looks more of a martingale right? Does sports betting follow the same set of progressions as in roulette? Is there any that specifically works in sports betting only?

I forgot to mention, most of them use it to build up a decent bankroll quick ...
Cheers

Quote from: Big EZ on August 12, 2013, 01:07:37 AM

   
• ~:trigger happy: when an unintelligent feels invincible and while tracking sees another 'thing' happen and decides to play another game while waiting, usually resulting in a war against random and leaves the player mumbling unintelligent a$$ to itself, or just straying from the current game plan, we've all been there.

This needs to be added to the roulette dictionary [smiley]aes/thumb.png[/smiley]

Nice input ...
I don't find topic like this impressive at all ...

Quote from: weddings on August 13, 2013, 03:32:52 PM
I foresee a desolated section

The idea is that you can use system with slots as you can with RNG roulette, i don't see any difference ...
I mean hole forum is based upon fallacies, roulette, slots, blackjack, baccarat, sic bo ... so what's the point not having a slot section ? same as any other casino game ?

This is after all a gambling forum and i would like to see a slot section, i think it's a great idea ...
I also been thinking to read JP book about 41 existing methods playing slots.

Why would we limit a gambling forum when slots is part of it ...

 
Sport-betting is a good way to walk ... see two attach files ... should let you get started ...
I know people that make serious money using the 2-6 method ... you can even build your own version of it ...

2
1
1
1 State 1
2
2 State 2
1
1
1
1 State 2
2
1
2 State 3
2
1
1 State 2
2
2
2
2
2
2 State 2
1
1 State 2
2
1
2
1
2 State 3
2
1
1 State 2
1
1
1
1
2
2 State 2
2
1
2
1 State 3

RBBB or RRRBRRR state 1
RRRBB state 2
RBRB state 3

2
1
1
1
2
2 L
1
1 W
1
1
2
1 L
2 L
2
1
1 W
2
2 W
2
2
2
2
1
1 W
2
1 L
2 W
1
2
2
1
1 W
1
1
1
1
2
2 W
2
1
2 L
1 W
1
1
2
1 L
2 W
2
1
1 W
2
2 W
2
1
1 W
1
1
1
1
2
Here above can you see after two loses LL that only two state hits and continue hitting.
Series that chop and singles that alternate.

 
-

With this one i got a draw-down at 7 units and still looking good ,,, have to ask ND how to apply MM to this animal ...
And the secound chart i was down 6 units at most ... maybe i should develop a trigger and not play non-stop ...
-

 
Finally i find a working method with this methodology ...
D alambert look like a good option as staking plan ...
With this chart i just following the two most dominant dozens ...

In my opinion so is this the best and most superior way playing even money bets ... if you can rap your head around what kind of march to apply ...
The highest bet placed during 300 trails was 5 units, that is pretty good.

 
I like the data with lines (6 numbers) that sleeping position can you convert into even money bets, pretty cool ...

Quote from: Bally6354 on August 05, 2013, 07:41:32 PM
That's true Bayes. I have been there and bought the T-shirt! (several of them)

Roy Ward Dickson might have something where he waits for one of these sleepers to appear and then starts attacking them in the hope that they will compensate from their absence with a short burst of wins. (I will start a separate topic with some of his ideas)

cheers

RWD "one number" is one of them ,,, i have the RX code for that one ...

 
Nice ...

 
I got this from ND with JP Style ...
Regression method capitalize on every win made ,,, as it use regression and it also capitalize on all zig zag sequence ,,, it also capitalize on domination with up and pull ...
Flat betting bet same amount at all times.

This is how i do my testing ,,, i play one session with Regression UP&PULL ,,, then i replay same session flat betting to see the difference ,,, amazing results ...

 
Turner are you saying that you bet that the sleeping position will show ?
Or do you say that you play what is current and present as you know there is a sleeping position ?
I ask,,, as its in my opinion a big difference of methodology ...

 
I like the topic about checking sleepers ,,, not just sure how to take advantage out of them ...

Lets say you have always one line sleeping with six numbers.Then when three lines show and you play them like even money position, then comes question, do you face twelve numbers against you or more.
You know one line will not show so you face two lines at most.

That is how i been thinking about sleepers.

Same as if you aim to only use does numbers that has a show ,,, then you don't face 37 degree of freedom as many numbers will sleep during first cycle, even for secound cycle ...
So if you had selection based upon that its same as playing no zero wheel.

My opinon ...