Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!

Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - TheMagician

#76
Quote from: 8OR9 on September 13, 2017, 01:27:29 PM


The intelligent, professional, speculator or gambler will say he won 2% of bankroll or 4 % of bankroll or lost 2% of bankroll or lost 4 % of bankroll

Well said, indeed.

Whatever investment you make, even a game of chance is an investment with a certain risk.  You always look at the return (profitability ratio) on investment (ROI) in terms of percent. The most commonly used ROI formula is net profits divided by the total cost of the investment which in a gamblers case is his initial BR (Bank Roll), and where the quotient is converted to a percentage by multiplying it by 100.

It is basically a simple formula that investors or professional gamblers can use to evaluate their risk investments and judge how well a particular investment, or game,  has performed compared to others. There are of course more complex formulas where time is included (longevity of exposed risk versus profit), but essentially all end up with a converted quotient in percent in any professional gamblers mind.
#77
You are using words like "politics", "Classified" and so on as a viable argument in defense of this censorship of your own website where you invite members of this forum.

Not a good start. You need to work on your "pitch and salesmanship" when presenting something to the public.

I´ve already lost interest in whatever you might have to offer based on certain conditions fulfilled according to your standards and I would appreciate if you could cancel my registration ASAP,  thank you.
#78
I don´t know about Esoito, but I did register at the forum, yet I couldn't access a single link or document. You seem to have censored the larger part of the website. Why is that?

I suggest you put up some sign on your website that informs newcomers that the site is under development and many posts or material are unavailable, otherwise you will get ppl pissed off and quickly losing interest in it and any view you might hold or present there.

Just saying.
#79
Yes, I noticed the same thing. I registered on his forum, and still, I wasn't able to access a single document, or in any way any link

as u see in the image below the ones marked with red arrows are password protected.



No explanation or guidance is given on his website. At first sight, it looked interesting, but a few minutes later you leave it with a notion you lost time trying to access what was promised on his posts here. I don´t think it is a scam site. I more prone to believe the owner hasn´t made up his mind what he wants to show the public and what he wants to keep hidden from it.
#80
Quote from: Albalaha on July 15, 2017, 06:45:08 AM
Sadly, mathematics has no room for perceptions.


Again you are in error. Mathematics is a language of the Human Mind based solely on its PERCEPTION and human TRANSLITERATION of a conditional Universe through its various sense organs.

From this perception and need to have phenomena measured in various units with what was deemed as acceptable accuracy (though ever changing spatiotemporal conditions offered the problem of approximation)  arose the need to develop a language that could handle this with a precision and level of proof, acceptable to the same Human Mind as an empirical reference source wherever, and whenever it moved through this spatiotemporal continuum it deemed, and deems, as a Universe.

Does this make Mathematics absolute? No, it does not, as it is an EVOLVING LANGUAGE of an evolving race in a relative continuum of ever-changing conditions. Each error, or approximation, produces a new theorem that results in a validation via a new proof and affirmation of its peers (read,  human minds) and so on. This, of course, has been going on since the first attempts by a human to develop a way to count beans or stones.

Mathematics as a language is not self-existent, nor self-real. It is just a way to interpret perceived reality and as we all know by now, perception changes from every change of position in time and space by an observer in relation to the observed.



#81
Very nice website and ideas including the referenced R&D and brains behind that concept. Will surely pay your site some more visits in the future for some in-depth analysis. Congrats to the good work :)
#82
Quote from: esoito on July 14, 2017, 08:30:09 AM
Just to clarify, Thomas:   Victor has NOT appointed him as a Global Moderator.

But -- like all other thread starters -- he is simply Moderator of his own thread.



Thank God for that.

Beyond the fact, that he seems to suffer from a milder form of receptive aphasia, that mind of his really dwells in a very dark bubble of self-loathing. A bubble that forces him to see everything "outside" as a potential threat to its self-chosen isolation and not an opportunity to collate data, strategies and good stories with what essentially are "comrades in arms" in the same game.

#83
Quote from: Mike on July 13, 2017, 10:50:17 AM
I'm assuming that your strategy isn't reliant on "traditional" advantage play data such as ball movement, type, dealer characteristics, bias, etc, and that you use only past numbers in order to make your predictions?

If that's the case, then I'm wondering why you need a team to test the theory. Why not just avail yourself of actual recorded spins in the public domain and write a computer simulation? It would reduce the uncertainties and inevitable errors associated with using a team of people.

When it comes to input data, not only previous numbers have served as a baseline for future predictions, but also dealer characteristics, bet windows and in some cases, even bias.

Consequently, the Team served to confirm my theories, and at the same time enrich themselves both financially while learning a new field in numerical prescience. They also provided fresh new ideas and suggestions that increased improvement in the positive WL ratio which is so important in roulette.  Had I been by myself I would have surely failed if I continued my R&D in this incredibly complex area.

As you know most roulette gamblers (and a few players), deal with apophenia. This is the very reason they inevitably lose their bankroll against the HE and of course negative variance every Casino provides. In my experience, most of these gamblers are equally ignorant of the practical impact the Law of Large (and especially) small numbers has on their game. This law, however immutable in itself, still produces anomalies that with the right tools can be detected and used in favor of the player. These anomalies cannot be detected by conventional numerical pattern detection (Apophenia), but only through the implementation of frequency and Harmonics wave differentiation.

Consequently, as you might understand, my platforms (the above-mentioned tools) do not deal with apophenia but with the very substratum of phenomena that is frequency and Harmonics in continuous wave interference, our brains translates and experiences as color, sound, form etc. combined with probability calculus of any given prediction.

I have written quite a few posts about it on this forum. If you check my posting history you should be able to find them and draw your own conclusions.



#84
Quote from: Albalaha on July 13, 2017, 05:11:21 AM
       Rather, all these suggested money management ensures faster and bigger losses that goes irreparable too.
A well reasoned and all seasoned money management(not only mindlessly increasing or decreasing or staying flat) will help, for sure.
            Those who say that they can win with precognition, without inculcating any money management are godsend angels. It is not doable humanly.           EC bets suit most to any money management. although any MM can be tweaked to fit any bet although not perfectly, EC looks a balance bet to me. I pick Player in baccarat just for the sake of simplicity and have given arguments for that in my blog earlier too. Banker bet is not suitable for any kind of progressive betting. Banker will win more statistically due to drawing rules yet it is not so good.

You are wrong on all points. I speak from a considerable experience and research when it comes to R&D of prescient software algorithms and applications in the frequency and harmonics field that can beat any given physical roulette wheel given the proper input data from spatiotemporal sensitive number generators, such as a physical roulette wheel.

Your ideas of money management and bet selections are equally antiquated. You also fail to include the necessary indicators and variance graphs needed in this game which is easiest applied from the considerable experience of the fx- and equity market when dealing with money and complex systems of futures and options.

For over a year now I have led a team that has provided empirical proof how easy the game of roulette is to beat once you implement above-mentioned factors. All tests have been done in live dealer Casinos under a strict protocol in order to have a correct baseline evaluation. Suffice to say the live tests from the team has till this day passed the 200,000 spin mark. Evaluated factors have been average unit return per spin during a session, return on risked capital/session, win-loss Ratio, maximum dip (losses) during any given session, a functionality of implemented stop-loss indicators, players variance curves and so on.

The platforms created incorporating all these functions, based on the unifying principle of frequency and harmonics differentiation [1] in numerical settings, has yet to produce a single losing session, much less loss of an entire bank roll.

I couldn´t help but notice how you displayed a mindset in Esoito´s recent thread that was very closed to anything beyond the purview of your own knowledge, which I have assessed as exceedingly limited. I am surprised that anyone suffering from such close-mindedness is allowed to be a moderator at betselection.cc 

Your ideas and negative view on what basically is a positive game for those with the curiosity and willingness to research it are at best contagious on the mindset of newcomers, and at worst, creatively inhibiting on old timers looking for a fresh point of view beyond your own.




[1] Frequency and Harmonics differentiation in numerical settings has a much in common with numerology, and other new age ideas, as Astronomy/Astrophysics has in common with astrology, which as you understand is basically none. 

Here is a nice page on Physics of Music notes  http://www.phy.mtu.edu/~suits/notefreqs.html
This is on a very basic ABC level but it serves my point about the limited view you seem to have on the REALITY around you and what exactly it is capable of once you gain insight and ability to read, write and speak its language under the precise laws of its "grammar".


#85
There is a reason the famous American expression " There´s a sucker born every minute" was minted a long time ago. Attributed to the notorious scammer P.T. Barnum, the expression was derived from the immense naivete he saw in ordinary humans when it came to grandiose spectacles and get rich or superior elixir & health schemes.

This has applied and still applies in the gambling sector. The old histories of struck out system-losers at the Monte Carlo Baccarat and Roulette Tables during the 19th and 20th century who then turned around and tried to sell their fool-proof systems to the nearest unattentive sucker are legion.

This fact and flawed character in the human psyche is a never ending story. Greed and hope are but one of the attracting pheromones that make such humans do such stupid things due to inability to think clearly for themselves whenever they are subject to the bitter-sweet odor of getting rich quick schemes, but one could also attribute laziness and short-circuited logic to this perfume of sheer stupefication. The latter even happening to academics when confronted with the very sirens of above-mentioned schemes.
#86
Quote from: plolp on July 11, 2017, 09:27:15 PM
Do you use  hertz to make calculations on harmonics ?

Yes. How else would one measure a cyclic,  periodic event in any given phenomenon that resonates?
#87
General Discussion / Re: BRAINSTORMING THREAD
July 10, 2017, 10:03:44 AM
Very good initiative, Esoito. Hopefully, you will get the creative members here get going and contributing with something interesting.

All the best.

TM
#88
Quote from: plolp on July 09, 2017, 11:51:53 PM
In music there are the notes (it sometimes takes a little for a melody)
You assign a number to a note of some sort.

But there is also the rhythm.

Do you assign something for the rhythm?

The rhythm is decided by the player's variance against the wheel. With variance here, I am talking about the outcome of the player betting said predicted numbers against the wheel. If they win regularly, then the variance is in players favor, as the predictions are correct and hence the curve goes up (check my images again). If the predictions are wrong then the bet loses and the variance curve becomes negative (predictions have yet not matured in sync with the wheel)

Numerical Prescience (number prediction) via frequency and number harmonics (number interrelation) always leaves traces you can measure. In my case, I measure the quality and rhythm of my predictions via above-mentioned variance curves which in their visual information value, is the fastest way at least I know how I can determine the outcome of  any given spin, and,  where I stand against the Casino and how the rhythm of the predictions is - Smooth, erratic, volatile or heavenly.

The superior player in roulette is the one who can see WHERE (space) and WHEN (Temporality) to bet a specific sector on the wheel, in order to hit the right number. :)

#89
Quote from: plolp on July 09, 2017, 11:40:18 PM
Nice ...

A little less poetic:

The number 1 fall .... is this enough information?

If only for orientation.

It may take 2 numbers  ?

Nothing appears by itself, or by its own accord. Everything in this universe is interdependent (linked). Frequency wise, a new number is always the result of at least two previous frequencies interacting.  Look at my first image I posted on this thread. Study it carefully. You have everything you need there in order to find the answers to your many questions. Trust me on that one. ;)

Good endeavor and good luck.
#90
Quote from: plolp on July 09, 2017, 11:20:31 PM
No I have only a very vague idea .

Even vague ideas can bloom into beautiful flowers if provided with enough patience, water, and sunlight from the Mind that harbors them.