Additional info.
FYI, please add the following into the subject of Sections & Turning Points, as I have discussed them.
I am basing the following figures off of a very common $25.00/Min to $5,000.00 table in the Midwest rather than a common $100/Min to $10,000.00 table in Atlantic City or Vegas. Yes there are higher limits with usually higher mins, such as a $300/$500 Min. with a $25,000.00 Max off the street limit without front money table, etc., but I am stating what I see every week at a $25.00/$5,000.00 table. Limits are employed for reasons to assure casinos players cannot guarantee themselves a comeback and a win, even with larger bank rolls and buy-ins.
I do not subscribe the the fallacy and the long term haunting karma of, "Beating The Casino" or "Beating The Shoe". A win is a win and replenishes my buy-in first and then my bankroll where the buy-in came from as first priorities before locking up the excess, etc. How long I play a session depends on numerous things, too many to list out and situations/sessions produce varying things. I do risk my buy-in most times and if I cannot win I seldom buy-in a second time for that session/trip. If I win, my money management method is kicked in. If I am up and down without really winning anything substantial or barley getting over my buy-in with continued wins, I might call it a session based upon what is happening, etc.
Most players look to "Beat The Shoe" and "Turn The Lights Out" on the casino. Both dangerous and both produces false positive thoughts, IMO. Of course I love to win. But losses go along with those very same winning sessions. I do not grind as many say and label their own way of playing. I do not subscribe to a daily or a session grind with a limited Stop Loss or a limited Stop Win. I risk my buy-in. For those of you that have followed my writing here on this board, know that. For those new members that have not, I detest the limited Stop Loss and a limited Stop Win for numerous reasons. But most of all, I risk my buy-in funds and try my best to strictly adhere to my Money Management Method I have outlined.
I look to play along with the shoe, rather than against it or needing it to match up to my wager for me to win. I am referring to things such as anti streak wagering, whereas a player would wait for a 3-4 or 5 repeating B or P win to place a wager for the opposite side cut to happen. Yes, over the long run there are all kinds of mathematics, statistics and percentages greater than 50% with various forms of scientific and math probability factors that will support wagering for the opposite side cut to present itself next after 3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10 hands, etc., and so on. However, say you wager for the cut after a 3 repeating B or P is presented. Your wager is $200.00. The Banker produces 3 Banker wins straight and you place $200.00 on the Players side. A 4th Banker appears. Then you move to $400.00 on your next wager and a fifth Banker appears. Then you move to $800.00 and a sixth Banker appears. You are now into your attempt to win $200.00 with $1,400.00 out of your buy-in lost. Now you have to wager $1,600.00 to continue on your path you started to recoup your lost $1,400.00 and win $200.00. The dilemma you put yourself into was, counting on the shoe to adhere to long term statistical results of less than 100% to hold accurate for your wagering. You are actually wagering for the shoe to meet what you desire rather than yourself attempting to wager with the shoe.
Yes, the shoe might cut to the opposite side 10 times straight on the 4th, 5th, 6th repeating hand for the following hand. And you capitalize on that particular wager one unit, say $200.00 for ten times, $2,000.00. However, what about the 4 or 5 or 6 times it will not and the repeating side continues to repeat? You lose all of your winnings for all of those times. How deep and how far do you dive into the attempt to recoup, win or break even? Most people will answer that very same question with an innocent and believable, "Oh, I will employ a 3 or 4 attempt stop loss" or something to that effect. but with a negative progression as I outlined, will certainly and extremely quickly add up to sizable amounts. Thus, wiping out wins and buy-ins and bank rolls. So you won $200.00, 10 or even 20 times? So what. What about the 5 or 6 times out of say 15 or 16 times you employed that, that you lost? What about the one time you went 8 or 9 progressions deep, etc.? So, back to the 4th attempt we are at above with your $1,400.00 lost so far on 3 failed cut attempts to complete an anti streak wager because of statistical results so it will rather than continuing a repeating streak. The next wager would be $1,600.00 and you are now risking $3,000.00 for the recouping attempt and winning $200.00. If lost, you will then be into your attempt with $3,000.00 lost and the question arises, about the next wager of $3,200.00 with the risk factor of $6,200.00. If you lose the 5th wager of $3,200.00 the next would have to be $6,400.00 with a risk factor of $12,600.00. Table limits come to question as well. Maybe you can play two spots, some casino allow this, most do not. Maybe you are at a larger table limit property but then the $25.00 min most likely would be $50.00 or at least $100.00 and your max still will limit you to 5 or 6 attempts, etc.
Even if you wait for the 6th repeating win and wager on the 7th one. It is common for 7-8-9-10 and even 11 times for a repeating B or P to repeat itself. Yes, before the onslaught of chastising comes here, I am very well aware of the statistical odds gaining huge amounts of percentages on the next hand to cut when there are continued repeating wins after hand 5 on any side. But the streaks happen and happen all the time. They are not rare by any means. And streaks or playing anti streaks or anything of the likes can and do, wipe out buy ins and bank rolls every day of the week. That is my point here.
Or, maybe you switched up during the attempt to be correct on the cut and you went with the streaking side and then it cut, etc. Does not matter. Same results. Which is a loss of your wager.
Other types of scheduled wagering also apply and really no different than the above example to wager for anti streaking. And yes, eventually with a large enough bank roll and/or buy-in available (dependent upon table limits), you can recoup your lost funds and win one unit if not more. But most, safely to say the highest amount of players do not have those funds available or are willing to risk those funds for such a trivial return, or one of numerous other reasons.
And please, do not misunderstand what I am saying. I am also for the cut at varying times. I do not just wager on streaks by any means. I do not limit myself or plan on any standard scheduled type of wager to bet on based upon anything. If you limit yourself to Banker or Player, or Cuts, or Repeats, or Chop, or doubles, or 1s and 2s or any other type of events, you will grind yourself down and ultimately lose. If not within a session, within a period of time. Sections & Turning Points will show the neutral, conscious, clear thinking player what is happening as it is happening. But it is still up to that player to determine what to wager on. Of utmost importance is the psychological influences imposed upon the player and his ability to not let those influence him (which is extremely difficult) and apply his knowledge, experience and money management method to his wagering, etc.
Turning Points & Sections are NOT after the event or shoe. They are during the event, during the presentments, each is only a hand or two, possibly three behind being drafted and established. You are fooling yourself if you assume otherwise.
FYI, please add the following into the subject of Sections & Turning Points, as I have discussed them.
I am basing the following figures off of a very common $25.00/Min to $5,000.00 table in the Midwest rather than a common $100/Min to $10,000.00 table in Atlantic City or Vegas. Yes there are higher limits with usually higher mins, such as a $300/$500 Min. with a $25,000.00 Max off the street limit without front money table, etc., but I am stating what I see every week at a $25.00/$5,000.00 table. Limits are employed for reasons to assure casinos players cannot guarantee themselves a comeback and a win, even with larger bank rolls and buy-ins.
I do not subscribe the the fallacy and the long term haunting karma of, "Beating The Casino" or "Beating The Shoe". A win is a win and replenishes my buy-in first and then my bankroll where the buy-in came from as first priorities before locking up the excess, etc. How long I play a session depends on numerous things, too many to list out and situations/sessions produce varying things. I do risk my buy-in most times and if I cannot win I seldom buy-in a second time for that session/trip. If I win, my money management method is kicked in. If I am up and down without really winning anything substantial or barley getting over my buy-in with continued wins, I might call it a session based upon what is happening, etc.
Most players look to "Beat The Shoe" and "Turn The Lights Out" on the casino. Both dangerous and both produces false positive thoughts, IMO. Of course I love to win. But losses go along with those very same winning sessions. I do not grind as many say and label their own way of playing. I do not subscribe to a daily or a session grind with a limited Stop Loss or a limited Stop Win. I risk my buy-in. For those of you that have followed my writing here on this board, know that. For those new members that have not, I detest the limited Stop Loss and a limited Stop Win for numerous reasons. But most of all, I risk my buy-in funds and try my best to strictly adhere to my Money Management Method I have outlined.
I look to play along with the shoe, rather than against it or needing it to match up to my wager for me to win. I am referring to things such as anti streak wagering, whereas a player would wait for a 3-4 or 5 repeating B or P win to place a wager for the opposite side cut to happen. Yes, over the long run there are all kinds of mathematics, statistics and percentages greater than 50% with various forms of scientific and math probability factors that will support wagering for the opposite side cut to present itself next after 3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10 hands, etc., and so on. However, say you wager for the cut after a 3 repeating B or P is presented. Your wager is $200.00. The Banker produces 3 Banker wins straight and you place $200.00 on the Players side. A 4th Banker appears. Then you move to $400.00 on your next wager and a fifth Banker appears. Then you move to $800.00 and a sixth Banker appears. You are now into your attempt to win $200.00 with $1,400.00 out of your buy-in lost. Now you have to wager $1,600.00 to continue on your path you started to recoup your lost $1,400.00 and win $200.00. The dilemma you put yourself into was, counting on the shoe to adhere to long term statistical results of less than 100% to hold accurate for your wagering. You are actually wagering for the shoe to meet what you desire rather than yourself attempting to wager with the shoe.
Yes, the shoe might cut to the opposite side 10 times straight on the 4th, 5th, 6th repeating hand for the following hand. And you capitalize on that particular wager one unit, say $200.00 for ten times, $2,000.00. However, what about the 4 or 5 or 6 times it will not and the repeating side continues to repeat? You lose all of your winnings for all of those times. How deep and how far do you dive into the attempt to recoup, win or break even? Most people will answer that very same question with an innocent and believable, "Oh, I will employ a 3 or 4 attempt stop loss" or something to that effect. but with a negative progression as I outlined, will certainly and extremely quickly add up to sizable amounts. Thus, wiping out wins and buy-ins and bank rolls. So you won $200.00, 10 or even 20 times? So what. What about the 5 or 6 times out of say 15 or 16 times you employed that, that you lost? What about the one time you went 8 or 9 progressions deep, etc.? So, back to the 4th attempt we are at above with your $1,400.00 lost so far on 3 failed cut attempts to complete an anti streak wager because of statistical results so it will rather than continuing a repeating streak. The next wager would be $1,600.00 and you are now risking $3,000.00 for the recouping attempt and winning $200.00. If lost, you will then be into your attempt with $3,000.00 lost and the question arises, about the next wager of $3,200.00 with the risk factor of $6,200.00. If you lose the 5th wager of $3,200.00 the next would have to be $6,400.00 with a risk factor of $12,600.00. Table limits come to question as well. Maybe you can play two spots, some casino allow this, most do not. Maybe you are at a larger table limit property but then the $25.00 min most likely would be $50.00 or at least $100.00 and your max still will limit you to 5 or 6 attempts, etc.
Even if you wait for the 6th repeating win and wager on the 7th one. It is common for 7-8-9-10 and even 11 times for a repeating B or P to repeat itself. Yes, before the onslaught of chastising comes here, I am very well aware of the statistical odds gaining huge amounts of percentages on the next hand to cut when there are continued repeating wins after hand 5 on any side. But the streaks happen and happen all the time. They are not rare by any means. And streaks or playing anti streaks or anything of the likes can and do, wipe out buy ins and bank rolls every day of the week. That is my point here.
Or, maybe you switched up during the attempt to be correct on the cut and you went with the streaking side and then it cut, etc. Does not matter. Same results. Which is a loss of your wager.
Other types of scheduled wagering also apply and really no different than the above example to wager for anti streaking. And yes, eventually with a large enough bank roll and/or buy-in available (dependent upon table limits), you can recoup your lost funds and win one unit if not more. But most, safely to say the highest amount of players do not have those funds available or are willing to risk those funds for such a trivial return, or one of numerous other reasons.
And please, do not misunderstand what I am saying. I am also for the cut at varying times. I do not just wager on streaks by any means. I do not limit myself or plan on any standard scheduled type of wager to bet on based upon anything. If you limit yourself to Banker or Player, or Cuts, or Repeats, or Chop, or doubles, or 1s and 2s or any other type of events, you will grind yourself down and ultimately lose. If not within a session, within a period of time. Sections & Turning Points will show the neutral, conscious, clear thinking player what is happening as it is happening. But it is still up to that player to determine what to wager on. Of utmost importance is the psychological influences imposed upon the player and his ability to not let those influence him (which is extremely difficult) and apply his knowledge, experience and money management method to his wagering, etc.
Turning Points & Sections are NOT after the event or shoe. They are during the event, during the presentments, each is only a hand or two, possibly three behind being drafted and established. You are fooling yourself if you assume otherwise.