Helping to Define Presentments, Models & Bet Selection Wagering, PART 1
How do you do what is correct today, like right now at the table? Talking about it and having others review it, a few will always find something wrong with what you said. And those types will go to great lengths in the attempt to prove their findings. Then they post, demean, humiliate and have a tiny consensus of their peers that join them. But the bottom line is, that they are living in a fallacy world of portraying that they play the necessary hours and amounts of shoes to equal the 51% Plus outcome and thus, they win each and every time. Complete and utter nonsense to the max!
Always a group of presentments will come around but subsequently, believing such is the way to win at baccarat, you are only preparing the depth of the hole to bury yourself. That group of wins that has a percentage of somewhere from 51 to 60% or even greater, on all the testing and results of mathematical models, will eventually come around. But the waiting time for any such event will eat up far more profits than you will make. But hey, certainly makes great worthless and senseless ammunition in the forum gambling board war of the full-time posters.
The times that those events do not come around, as well as the times your event just immediately fizzles out early, will eat those wagers up. Problem is, you are narrowing your vision, your consciousness and losing out of numerous chances and the ability to capitalize on presentments that everyone just responds with that all too familiar 'WOW' over. To me, that is the only way to explain the solid, powerful, consistent and repetitive patterns/trends/events being produced form the shoe with virtually very few if any people wagering with the shoe. They are nearly all hooked on the cut to the opposite last win or wagering on that event they found will register 51% Plus on thousands or tens of thousands of shoes.
Be it: XOXOXOXOXOXOXOXO or maybe; XXOOXXOOXXOOXXOOXXOO or maybe; XXXXXXXXXOXXXXXXX or maybe; XOOOXXOOXXXO or that every Natural win cuts to the opposite side or that every third card draw adds up to an 8 or a 9 total to one side only and reduces the other for like 7 or 8 or 10 consecutive hands. And many many more, too numerous to list.
Sure, you can engage and believe the gambling forum full time posters with their long drawn out dialog of samples that are proven by computer testing will put you on easy money street. But in reality, taking those same groups of events to the baccarat table, will prove a loss to yourself. Because you will do just as I said in the above info. You will have loss far more than you will ever win. Of course, every author I have read posts and posts their theories claiming they grind it out and make a solid living from it, but without any proof except computer generated score cards, their altered test results and their complex definitions of how and why it all happened. And those that say they win far more than they loss will never post a picture, never post a win-loss statement, never post their contact info, never get on the phone with another and numerous other traits of the same lines. They are internet drama queens and bored out of their minds. Fueled only by fallacy turned around and having a few in their small worthless group of followers.
There are ways to win at baccarat and it all has to do with mostly non-mechanical and non-mathematical knowledge.
Alrelax/Glen.
How do you do what is correct today, like right now at the table? Talking about it and having others review it, a few will always find something wrong with what you said. And those types will go to great lengths in the attempt to prove their findings. Then they post, demean, humiliate and have a tiny consensus of their peers that join them. But the bottom line is, that they are living in a fallacy world of portraying that they play the necessary hours and amounts of shoes to equal the 51% Plus outcome and thus, they win each and every time. Complete and utter nonsense to the max!
Always a group of presentments will come around but subsequently, believing such is the way to win at baccarat, you are only preparing the depth of the hole to bury yourself. That group of wins that has a percentage of somewhere from 51 to 60% or even greater, on all the testing and results of mathematical models, will eventually come around. But the waiting time for any such event will eat up far more profits than you will make. But hey, certainly makes great worthless and senseless ammunition in the forum gambling board war of the full-time posters.
The times that those events do not come around, as well as the times your event just immediately fizzles out early, will eat those wagers up. Problem is, you are narrowing your vision, your consciousness and losing out of numerous chances and the ability to capitalize on presentments that everyone just responds with that all too familiar 'WOW' over. To me, that is the only way to explain the solid, powerful, consistent and repetitive patterns/trends/events being produced form the shoe with virtually very few if any people wagering with the shoe. They are nearly all hooked on the cut to the opposite last win or wagering on that event they found will register 51% Plus on thousands or tens of thousands of shoes.
Be it: XOXOXOXOXOXOXOXO or maybe; XXOOXXOOXXOOXXOOXXOO or maybe; XXXXXXXXXOXXXXXXX or maybe; XOOOXXOOXXXO or that every Natural win cuts to the opposite side or that every third card draw adds up to an 8 or a 9 total to one side only and reduces the other for like 7 or 8 or 10 consecutive hands. And many many more, too numerous to list.
Sure, you can engage and believe the gambling forum full time posters with their long drawn out dialog of samples that are proven by computer testing will put you on easy money street. But in reality, taking those same groups of events to the baccarat table, will prove a loss to yourself. Because you will do just as I said in the above info. You will have loss far more than you will ever win. Of course, every author I have read posts and posts their theories claiming they grind it out and make a solid living from it, but without any proof except computer generated score cards, their altered test results and their complex definitions of how and why it all happened. And those that say they win far more than they loss will never post a picture, never post a win-loss statement, never post their contact info, never get on the phone with another and numerous other traits of the same lines. They are internet drama queens and bored out of their minds. Fueled only by fallacy turned around and having a few in their small worthless group of followers.
There are ways to win at baccarat and it all has to do with mostly non-mechanical and non-mathematical knowledge.
Alrelax/Glen.
