Play with the shoe.  Stop trying to change it, stop believing all the garbage on the internet and system books.  Stop believing the preaching about the highest percentage of this or that, especially with the 1s and the 2s.  Of course they contribute more percentage numbers than anything else, but might not be even 50% of the time you are sitting down playing.  The biggest thing of following anything, weak, strong, 1s, 2s, etc., etc., is making up your losses.  In flat betting and the grind, those losses will be greater than your wins, I do not care and I do not engage in combating those claiming otherwise any longer.  It is an insult what those people preach to others. 

As far as winning with larger wagers with progressions and parlays, etc., extremely addictive and increases your greediness and everything else that goes along with that.  I have written about this plenty of this site and the psychological effects and consequences of it all.  Look it up and re-read it. 

Anyway, last night here is a prime example of easy to make great money as well as easy to lose your buy in or bank roll, etc. 

Said it before, many times, 0-1-2 Ties or Low/No Ties, stays stronger than versus lots of ties more frequently. 

[attachimg=1]

Reference the 10 Banker Streak.  After that 5th Banker with the natural, the majority of all the players stack it up on the Players Side with wagers of $500 to $1,000.00 each.  Then they Marty as well.  Most stuck on the Bankers Side and continual lost whatever they won and most if not all of their buy ins and bank rolls brought.  At least 4 of the 5 that kept wagering to change the shoe, did get wiped out.

Player became stronger as you can see.  People only got hurt when they continually progressed with it or went Banker and then did the Marty.  Some survived, others got wiped.  But there was a consistent 1 Banker for the 4 times.  Sections, just look in Sections rather than the whole previous outcome, etc.  Then the double Banker and the triple Banker came.  Everyone went wild once again with visions of another Banker Streak, etc., etc., etc. 

Most would begin to ride the Players but they all went extremely light and flat bet.  What I fail to understand of most Players is their reluctance to wager heavy on the Players and also stick with the Players side, especially when the Players Side is coming on strong.  The stick with the Banker for a little bit then most believe in the cut and only in the cut.  Years ago, it was never like this. 

The start of the Players Streak, two people parlayed 2 or 3 times and then just kept pulling down their winnings.  The rest of the table (the majority of them anyway) went on the Bankers Side wagering with larger and larger bets or that gut stabbing Marty and they got wiped out, either the ones that survived from the beginning or other people sitting down citing, "Has to cut, Has to cut", or "Banker coming back like the beginning", etc., etc.

Also, what you are not seeing, are Hands 78-82.  Went like this:  78=Player, 79=Player, 80=Fortune 7 Banker, 81=Player, 82=Player and last hand, 83=Fortune 7 Banker.  Yes, 3 Fortune 7s within the last 10 hands. 

Two green circles I made are the Fortune 7s.  I did not have time to snap a picture of the board at the very end with hands 78-82 as described above.

Be careful, stop trying to change the shoe, play with it no matter if it is weak or strong. 

Quote from: AsymBacGuy on June 01, 2019, 09:31:33 PM
That line was obviosuly a sarcastic note about how is easy to distrust other's ideas and works putting atop of it the old fkng math issue saying that bac cannot be beaten.

Maybe it could.

as. 

It is all in your mind, the good and the bad. 

It is more emotions, psych, willpower and the realization that if you win you will lose too.  So it is how you divide up and manage those wins and how you manage your losses, I seen it last night at the casino with the shoe I posted when the F-7 Banker hand was dealt wrong at the beginning of it. 

Stop engaging in the internet board poop-poop with the flat bet win stop/loss stop grind of a few units and then the non recoverable multi unit loss everyone will experience.

There is really great win money to be realized if you recognize what it takes with buy ins that are risk capital and parlay's, side bets, side parlay's, etc., that will far outweigh your losses.  But you have to stay conscious of when to walk and when to stay, etc.   

In the UK they even have "Always a Gay Time" doughnut, really???  ROMAFL.  Now I understand the gayness and the proudness of it over there in Big Ben land!  LOL!

Look under the Hall of Fame doughnut under Main Menu, they are freaking kidding right?

https://doughnuttime.co.uk/main-menu

Only in the UK would they have a Captain America doughnut, ROMAFL!!!

https://doughnuttime.co.uk/main-menu

Last night, here is what happened within this shoe:

[attachimg=1]

On that first circled 'Fortune 7' (hand #6, the first Banker hand) the first two cards were; Players had two monkeys, Bankers had a 2 and a 4.  Dealer gives the 3rd Players card to the Player wagering the most and he flops a 6 and yells out, "Tie Hand".  He had the only Tie wager out there and he was wagering as well on the Players side. 

No one caught that the Bankers side still had to pull.  I have seen this many times, but usually when the Players side flops a 7 rather than the 6 for a total of 6, or even the one more mistakenly handled is the 7 on top of a 1 or a 2 showing for the Players side.  But anyway.....

On this particular hand, there was one person out of about 6 or so at the table wagering on the Fortune 7 and like I said, no one said anything.  Dealers pushes both sets of cards out front and motions for a Tie.  Pays the Tie and scoops up the cards and is dropping them and that is when someone said, "wait, you made a mistake you have to pull for the Banker".  Floor guy comes over and the dealer dropped the cards as that was being said.  Dealer turns to the floor and says, "I should have pulled, had a 3rd card of 6 for the Players and Banker had their first two cards with a total of 6".  Floor looks at everything and has one of those moments where whatever he does, not everyone is going to be happy.  Most people were on the Bankers side, a couple on the Players side. 

The Floor tells the dealer to pull the shoe in, he is calling surveillance to check the hand and then he will tell her what to do.  So after a few minuets he gets the call.  He says, "Surveillance told me that we have to finish the hand, put all the bets back, give the dealer back the Tie payout and we will place the cards back on the table".  The floor had the dealer empty the bucket on the table, there really was hardly any hands already played out, and she put the 5 cards back on the P and the B sides.  The floor said, "Is everyone in agreement, that this is what was on the table when the Players third card was drawn"?  Everyone agreed.  The dealer pulls one more card for the Banker and it was given to the person on the Banker side wagering the most.  He just motioned for the dealer to flip it and get on with the game.

The dealer flops an Ace for the Fortune 7 win.   

As well, WELCOME!  Alrelax.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msjKJBFsH3M

The ultimate pic and dedicated to the one that hangs at Bicycle, Commerce and H.G. bro, ROMAFL!  AKA: The card rooms.

[attachimg=1]

[attachimg=1]

 

[attachimg=1]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTDKcXtl4Jg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NP8y63Ms4o

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpquEzaFMKA

Any of the table games can have a tiny profit more often than a larger one.  Of course, 'tiny' and 'larger' or both subjective to whatever amount each player is dealing with.  But for comparison, say buying in with $1,000.00 playing with $25.00/$50.00 wagers would be relatively easier to walk away quickly with a $50.00 or even a $100.00 win than it would be to walk away with a $2,500.00 or a $3,000.00 win wagering the same amounts. 

Of course as you mentioned, problems arise when the players repeatably wager for additional wins consistently using whatever method of wagering they are subscribing to, etc.

The larger the wins, the larger the wagering units---usually lead most players to attempting the continued win or additional wins within a relatively short period of time after the initial session wins.  Easy to talk about here, harder to realize when you are table side and engaged in wagering as Lungyeh pointed out previously.

Initially, your assumption that I just don't get it, has you all wrong, and shows you do not understand what is charming, a pun or a factual statement.  What you wrote about is tedious, made up and derived from your pure assumptions.  After a while it gets tragic. Why you would go off on a tangent about drug cartels and bankers is beyond me, but a fine example of what hasn't worked for you here.

Since you consistently like tangents I'll mention this: recently two representatives were involved in a fracas in the US Congress. One, a "typical" white guy congressman, was telling the black congresswoman that he knew more about prejudice than she ever would. Do you get the absurdity? Do you see how offensive that is?

That congressman and you have something in common - you don't really listen, it's all output. Didn't I refer to a movie line recently with something along the lines of; "You need to set your motherfucker to receive!"  I'd have to find the movie to get the context, but in my head, it sounds appropriate.

Do you understand the phrase; "The meaning is the message"?  It means whatever your audience understands is the message, even if it differs wildly from what you think you meant. Speaking up in public (a lost career of mine) carries the reality that people will hear what they hear and it is rarely the same as what you say. When you avoid listening and show up telling us about our lives and what we should do to make it better, you already lost your audience, just like the congressman. It's where they got the term "mansplaining."  Even here, while you acknowledge my intellect, you explain the most blatantly obvious things as if I'm an unintelligent.  Of course you do not spell it out that same way, but you do in a roundabout way because you have exposed your absolute overwhelming ignorance, totally consumption of your ultra-obvious hatred of myself, that proves your jealously and admiration of my accomplishments that you will never realize. It is what it is bro.  Always has been and always will be.
 
The thing is, simply, that you haven't listened to the people you are dictating to. That's not a misunderstanding; the actual events that keep repeating are evidence and proof. It's also not a "conviction" or any other overwrought thing. It's incredibly common and we put up with it  ALL THE TIME.

So you show up and tell us things that we live every damn day. Good for you for knowing that we are marginalized in casino gambling, business, employment, and many other things, but telling us that as if you know more than we do (Such as; Glen, we live this way every day!) is insulting and got you the reputation you now love to complain about.

Your "I'm sorry BUT I'm right and you're wrong" doesn't do a lot for me. Taking out the tangents from your note, that's almost all you said, with the only additional thing being, "And Glen is crazy or a retard."  Actually if you look it up in any psych 101 book or research material, you will find that repeatedly dwelling on calling someone crazy and spending countless hours detailing out why that person is crazy or retarded, is only the true reflection of yourself and what you are actually about. That is actually the best part of all those hundreds and hundreds of posts and comments made by roughly 5 or 6 X-members here on various other boards.

Those banned members of our message board here actually proffered themselves while exposing what they are truly about and how they are consumed by myself.  Such a shame but by their own admission they exposed themselves, their jealousy and their worthless gambling endeavors. 

Care to step up your game?