Turning Points
(NOTE: Turning Points coincide with Sections. Without Sections, Turing Points are worthless for the most part, without Turning Points, Sections are worthless for the most part as well.)
There are two ways to assist in determining where a Turning Point should be. One, is by a definitive amount of hands played out; And two, is by the values of the hands being played out in each hands total.
1) There will be at least 2, but usually 3 or 4 Turning Points per shoe, coinciding with the 3-4 or 5 Sections. You cannot get the Sections and the Turning Points confused or fail to recognize them. They will both exist and always be there in each and every single shoe.
The definitive amount of hands will be somewhere from 15 to 25 per Section separated thereafter by a Turning Point. The Turning Point is not defined by what we wish, desire or need to be presented in order to match up to your schedule of wagers we set according to anything. Turning Points are to be set by the shoe's presentments.
2) The more complicated part and as well, subjective to one's interpretation, are the values of the hands being played out. To me, as well as many others that I regularly play baccarat with, are the hand values. Determining hand values and how those can and will identify a section within a Section, also known as clumping, will usually present itself, somewhere within the highest majority of most shoes. You must be alert, conscious of what it is, looking for it, neutral and the many other things I have identified and written about that will lend advantages to you in the recognition of just that.
Above all else, you must not attempt to change the shoe presentments and wager according to a pre-scheduled mechanical and thought out chain of event you wish to happen. That will only produce false-positives that will lead you down a path you wish you never entered. Realizing values of the presented hands are essential to capitalizing on the advantage that will allow you to literally, "Pounce on It".
I am not going down the road of math, statistics or scientific probability of computer generated, long term testing or research results, etc., or anything of the like. If you believe in those, STOP reading now and move on. We do not see eye-to-eye or anything that will allow us to interface and learn from each other. Reason being, anyone into math, statistics, or scientific probability measured in percentages can justify just about anything outside of the casino and away from actual play. The long term simply does not matter/apply to a random game where a person is only playing a few shoes, even 10 shoes or so, even 15. All the math and all the stats apply far less than 50% of the time with the amount of shoes or hands a player will sit in front of for a session. If you are neutral and open minded and desiring to gain an advantage in baccarat, read on, comment, implement and discuss.
Either P or B, or both, can clump within a Section. A great advantage to a person wagering is being able to get on the right side or the right events within any Section with some strong positive progression or parlay wagering. For example the shoe below had a strong Section 2 as well as a strong Section 1. Sections 3 and 4 would be the harder ones for myself to play. After Sections 1 and 2, myself--I was done with the shoe and cashed out.
3rd Card continuous additions or reductions in hand value. Pay attention because this is what more clumping and more streaks or chop-chop or any other section of events with consistency is made up from.
As an example I will post a shoe from the other night at the casino. 4 Sections with 3 Turning Points. The first clump came at the beginning of the 2nd Section.
P
B-B
P
B
P
B-B
P (Section 1)
B-B
P-P
B
P-P
B
P
B
______________________________________________________________________________
P-P-T-T-P-P-P-P-P-P
B-B-B-B (Section 2)
P-P-P
B-B
P
______________________________________________________________________________
B-B-T
P-P
B
P-P (Section 3)
B
P-T-P-P-P
B
P-P-T
______________________________________________________________________________
B
P
B-B
P
B-B
P (Section 4)
B
P
B
P
B-B
P-T-P-P-T
***************************************************************************
FINAL:
Banker=30
Player=39
Ties=7
Panda 8s=2
Fortune 7s=3
3 Card 8/9s=1
TOTAL COUNTS BY SECTIONS:
Section 1=Player 9, Banker 10
Section 2=Player 21, Banker 16
Section 3=Player 31, Banker 21
Section 4=Player 39, Banker 30
Please refer to the + - 10/+ - 20 Count I have detailed in other threads. This sticks more than almost anything other consistent happening throughout the shoe, IMO, experience and witnessing over the years.
This particular shoe finished with a Player +9. Use the + or - as one guideline, coupled with others that are presenting themselves, will allow you to gain a certain advantage and be there when something develops on the correct side. Rather than joining most everyone with the verbal astonishment's and open mouth disbelief's as for example, how the Players side can present 12 straight Players with 5 naturals, and the other 7 Player wins having a 3rd card bring the Players side total to either 8 or 9 nearly every time.
Turning Point #1 placed between hands 19 and 20 because of the following. 1) The number of hands. 2) Player began to dominate as realized by the two natural ties and the 3rd Player presented. 3) Nothing strong appearing in first Section. 4) Player continuously winning for 3 hands straight with surviving the cut of 2 Natural Ties.
Turing Point #2 placed between hands 39 and 40 because of the following. 1)
Turning Point #3 placed between hands 57 and 58 because of the following. 1)
Comments for Section 1:
Comments for Section 2: Player/Banker tie natural 8/8 hand 22. Player/Natural tie 9/9 hand 23. Hand 24 Play increases to a 2 card 9 over Banker 2 card 7. Hand 25 Player increases to 3 card 8 over Banker total of 0.
Comments for Section 3:
Comments for Section 4:
(NOTE: Turning Points coincide with Sections. Without Sections, Turing Points are worthless for the most part, without Turning Points, Sections are worthless for the most part as well.)
There are two ways to assist in determining where a Turning Point should be. One, is by a definitive amount of hands played out; And two, is by the values of the hands being played out in each hands total.
1) There will be at least 2, but usually 3 or 4 Turning Points per shoe, coinciding with the 3-4 or 5 Sections. You cannot get the Sections and the Turning Points confused or fail to recognize them. They will both exist and always be there in each and every single shoe.
The definitive amount of hands will be somewhere from 15 to 25 per Section separated thereafter by a Turning Point. The Turning Point is not defined by what we wish, desire or need to be presented in order to match up to your schedule of wagers we set according to anything. Turning Points are to be set by the shoe's presentments.
2) The more complicated part and as well, subjective to one's interpretation, are the values of the hands being played out. To me, as well as many others that I regularly play baccarat with, are the hand values. Determining hand values and how those can and will identify a section within a Section, also known as clumping, will usually present itself, somewhere within the highest majority of most shoes. You must be alert, conscious of what it is, looking for it, neutral and the many other things I have identified and written about that will lend advantages to you in the recognition of just that.
Above all else, you must not attempt to change the shoe presentments and wager according to a pre-scheduled mechanical and thought out chain of event you wish to happen. That will only produce false-positives that will lead you down a path you wish you never entered. Realizing values of the presented hands are essential to capitalizing on the advantage that will allow you to literally, "Pounce on It".
I am not going down the road of math, statistics or scientific probability of computer generated, long term testing or research results, etc., or anything of the like. If you believe in those, STOP reading now and move on. We do not see eye-to-eye or anything that will allow us to interface and learn from each other. Reason being, anyone into math, statistics, or scientific probability measured in percentages can justify just about anything outside of the casino and away from actual play. The long term simply does not matter/apply to a random game where a person is only playing a few shoes, even 10 shoes or so, even 15. All the math and all the stats apply far less than 50% of the time with the amount of shoes or hands a player will sit in front of for a session. If you are neutral and open minded and desiring to gain an advantage in baccarat, read on, comment, implement and discuss.
Either P or B, or both, can clump within a Section. A great advantage to a person wagering is being able to get on the right side or the right events within any Section with some strong positive progression or parlay wagering. For example the shoe below had a strong Section 2 as well as a strong Section 1. Sections 3 and 4 would be the harder ones for myself to play. After Sections 1 and 2, myself--I was done with the shoe and cashed out.
3rd Card continuous additions or reductions in hand value. Pay attention because this is what more clumping and more streaks or chop-chop or any other section of events with consistency is made up from.
As an example I will post a shoe from the other night at the casino. 4 Sections with 3 Turning Points. The first clump came at the beginning of the 2nd Section.
P
B-B
P
B
P
B-B
P (Section 1)
B-B
P-P
B
P-P
B
P
B
______________________________________________________________________________
P-P-T-T-P-P-P-P-P-P
B-B-B-B (Section 2)
P-P-P
B-B
P
______________________________________________________________________________
B-B-T
P-P
B
P-P (Section 3)
B
P-T-P-P-P
B
P-P-T
______________________________________________________________________________
B
P
B-B
P
B-B
P (Section 4)
B
P
B
P
B-B
P-T-P-P-T
***************************************************************************
FINAL:
Banker=30
Player=39
Ties=7
Panda 8s=2
Fortune 7s=3
3 Card 8/9s=1
TOTAL COUNTS BY SECTIONS:
Section 1=Player 9, Banker 10
Section 2=Player 21, Banker 16
Section 3=Player 31, Banker 21
Section 4=Player 39, Banker 30
Please refer to the + - 10/+ - 20 Count I have detailed in other threads. This sticks more than almost anything other consistent happening throughout the shoe, IMO, experience and witnessing over the years.
This particular shoe finished with a Player +9. Use the + or - as one guideline, coupled with others that are presenting themselves, will allow you to gain a certain advantage and be there when something develops on the correct side. Rather than joining most everyone with the verbal astonishment's and open mouth disbelief's as for example, how the Players side can present 12 straight Players with 5 naturals, and the other 7 Player wins having a 3rd card bring the Players side total to either 8 or 9 nearly every time.
Turning Point #1 placed between hands 19 and 20 because of the following. 1) The number of hands. 2) Player began to dominate as realized by the two natural ties and the 3rd Player presented. 3) Nothing strong appearing in first Section. 4) Player continuously winning for 3 hands straight with surviving the cut of 2 Natural Ties.
Turing Point #2 placed between hands 39 and 40 because of the following. 1)
Turning Point #3 placed between hands 57 and 58 because of the following. 1)
Comments for Section 1:
Comments for Section 2: Player/Banker tie natural 8/8 hand 22. Player/Natural tie 9/9 hand 23. Hand 24 Play increases to a 2 card 9 over Banker 2 card 7. Hand 25 Player increases to 3 card 8 over Banker total of 0.
Comments for Section 3:
Comments for Section 4: