Quote from: AsymBacGuy on September 12, 2018, 10:12:13 PM
our bac earnings had gotten a huge increase by additionally adopting the suggestions you have posted here.
And I'm talking very seriously.
as.
Define??? Explain?? thanks, Glen.
Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: AsymBacGuy on September 12, 2018, 10:12:13 PM
our bac earnings had gotten a huge increase by additionally adopting the suggestions you have posted here.
And I'm talking very seriously.
as.
Define??? Explain?? thanks, Glen.
Quote from: AsymBacGuy on September 06, 2018, 02:14:16 AM
Yeah!
You kept stressing about the importance to play wisely and actually and without any doubt this site is the only one to provide meaningful insights about how to reduce the house edge, to say the least.
as.
Quote from: AsymBacGuy on September 06, 2018, 08:58:57 PM
Besides playing and playing, the best way to get additional money is to mentor high stakes players and not asking miseries from common people. Otherwise the inventor should share ideas for free. Or write a book. Or simply shut up. (Hard to argue. Problem is, what is worth an actual cash payment or not? In today's day of "Scaminternet" so much everyday in the email, fake everything on Google, by Proxy take overs and everything in between, things get diluted pretty darn quick! I have seen people mentoring in person, playing alongside other good/experienced players. Some of them are paying them a percentage of the wins and some are not. Some pay for their time, etc., etc. But that is all in person. Over the internet, I don't have a clue. Of course, my own opinion in almost all cases is, that type of stuff will not make you any more money than you can honestly do on your own. Who will guide you and stop you when you actually need it??? That is the bottom line.)
Another option involving celebrity would be to give a lecture at MIT, but more likely than not the listeners would laugh at him/her. (If you are absolutely so talented, it should be documented and you can certainly go on tour, just like a real job. Takes lots of time, hard work, promo items, advertising, etc., etc., nothing is for free, everyone understands that. But the concept of, "You pay me $XYZ over the internet, super secret, I don't divulge my name, where I live or anything else, and I teach you the real secret to beating the casino", LOL. Join the website with the real scammers all bonded together called, BeattheCasino. A bunch of real self admitted pros that beat the casino and make lots and lots of cash, LOL, did I say LOL??)
Therefore system sellers are 100% scammers by definition. (Pretty much, I would like to lower that to 99.5%, I do think there are some real experienced great players that made their money or gave up trying and can be a real good guide to someone. But IMO, has to be in person and right there, and the deal has to be, when and if I win, we split. Other than that with the super secret internet and hide the identity and face pictures and all that, of course it is a scam)
Giz provided interesting concepts here but the idea that randomness involving perfect independent events might be controlled is totally unacceptable. (I have gambled B&M for many years. Many many. There is no way any type of pre scheduled wagering can be perfect, no possible way. As far as events and identifying them, no way as well. If you cut way down and control yourself for countless hours, you help yourself avoid loss but you also take away many of the chances for the quick win also. So, damned if you do and damned if you don't. I wrote about this kind of stuff, thinking and emotional conflict a lot.)
To win at games we need to find spots where probability values change. And to do that we absolutely need finite dependent events, that is games of cards. (Yes correct. Absolutely. But always a possibility of loss as well. You need risk capital, risk outlay, positive and quick progression, parlays and side wagering as well as the experience to know when to cash out or continue.)
Roulette can only be beaten by defects of production (biased wheels or biased software). (I am not touching that one. But I do constantly see the level and other instruments being placed upon the wheel, etc., when the game is being played)
as.
Quote from: AsymBacGuy on September 06, 2018, 02:14:16 AM
Yeah!
You kept stressing about the importance to play wisely and actually and without any doubt this site is the only one to provide meaningful insights about how to reduce the house edge, to say the least.
as.
Quote from: Lungyeh on April 29, 2018, 12:28:17 AM
The defining factor that make any system suitable only to an individual to a smaller or larger extent is the human emotions. Perhaps the mathematicians can formulate all human emotions but for sure even given a certain exact trend then prevailing, humans may react differently because the players at the table are different, the dealer is different, the player just quarrelled with the wife, the player just had a fantastic 50 shades of grey BDSM sex etc etc.
My 2 cents worth of opinion.
Quote from: AsymBacGuy on October 16, 2017, 12:56:13 AM
An entire shoe producing all B-P chops (even discounting ties) is impossible to believe.
Even admitting 30 ties, the probability to get 50 BP chopped hands represents a more than 7 sr deviation, that is the same probability to get a 50 hands streak.
In the history of roulette and baccarat there are no records of such values.
(roulette records known= 42 blacks and 41 chopping hands)
If this should be true, it's an additional proof that baccarat tends to get the opposite outcome of the last happened. As bac streaks of 50 never happened.
as.