1s and 2s to me are very dangerous, IMO. However, and NOT double talking, I do well on doubles. But repetitive and IAR doubles, not sporadic 1s/2s.
You guys know my style by now, (I would think). I weigh in zero/low ties, any obvious repeating event like every natural cutting or every tie cutting, etc., my invention of One More, Equalization and so on.
But most importantly and foremost, with clear mind, playing what is happening rather than what I desire or experienced in previous wins and all those types of things.
All in all though, what wins will also lose (reference events).
Limiting what you see to small Sections as I used to outline and totally being oblivious to Sections prior, is a huge advantage IMO.
You guys know my style by now, (I would think). I weigh in zero/low ties, any obvious repeating event like every natural cutting or every tie cutting, etc., my invention of One More, Equalization and so on.
But most importantly and foremost, with clear mind, playing what is happening rather than what I desire or experienced in previous wins and all those types of things.
All in all though, what wins will also lose (reference events).
Limiting what you see to small Sections as I used to outline and totally being oblivious to Sections prior, is a huge advantage IMO.