Steven in all seriousness you think I post only shoes that are against your system I honestly do not know your entire system I just don't play mechanically preconceived but placement methods. End of story I  play the way that I play that's highly successful LOL I don't play every day I play almost every week on the local scale I post almost all of my results the losing games no one likes to post no one likes to think about that's the way a real Gambler is I'm sorry.  I wrote about all this in my blog the amounts I lose our between 500 and maybe 1500 when I play I win thousands tens of thousands when the shoes are good in the shoes are doing what I was meant to do for the player I win big that's the way I play I'm not a grind player I don't play a couple hundred dollars and settle for a couple unit win every week I don't do it I admit it this many times. By the way I posted 16 shoes or 18 for you that are lives shoes over the last couple of months but you don't go on and analyze each one and talk about your system I took the time it took me at least 3 hours to find those shoes and then load each one separately for you I did that for you and it'll be the very last time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Quote from: Stephen Tabone on June 27, 2017, 12:54:57 AM
that one single shoe you have selected I would be 1- having exited half way through. If you want you're welcome to select 1,000 losing shoes. But you'll never post the winning shoes! I doubt that every much. Thus your posting of shoes in this respect is pointless. In my future book, 3.0 there are no bad shoes. Big claim I know but this is the truth.

what was the shoe I posted live from the casino and I won nearly $30,000 with it in my buddy one $39,000 with it to table or Casino lost about $200,000 Plus on that shoeI also posted 16 plus shoes on my thread you haven't run method on them each ones posted in the separate replied to the thread

Stephen, how much would someone have won on this shoe if they played to your system?

[attachimg=1]

Hi all.  I gave this a lot of thought last night I went to the casino and I did not play.  I had a wonderful dinner with a casino management person and a couple very large players in from out of town and we looked at the shoe, then turned and we looked at each other.   We asked people at the table and they were into it for tens of thousands of dollars and they almost had tears from their eyes.  So you know what we did?  We went out off property to a nearby town and we almost got drunk and I haven't done that for years with the four people I mentioned.

I thought about the little problem I had with Steven Tabone and here are my thoughts he is a good guy and he's on a good mission but there are many scientists in the world and we all cannot be a Dr. 'Emmet' Brown from Back to the Future, god I love that guy!!  And we all cannot be a Ghostbuster from New York City either. I Believe In My Own Heart Steven is too A-Alpha like myself and although there's nothing wrong with that being an author and in the public's eye or the eye of the people that are potential customers, I believe it is not the correct frame of mind to be in, but again that's in my opinion.

I'll go out on a limb here now, imagine that, lol.  I think Steven is too close-minded,  I used to be also, and I found out being completely open minded, I've done much better with non casino stuff as well as everything at the table.  Steven wants to blame something or somebody for things that don't look exactly right or go with his way.  Again, I used to be like that a long time ago but came to realize that even if someone caused or side-tracked me to the wrong or negative--it was collusion and liability on my part as well.  Also one more thing, he cannot be wrong which I'll tell you I've been wrong many times in my life and if I could go back and do it all over,  I would 100% do everything right and be the perfect person, but we can't do that!

That's the only three derogatory things in my mind that I want to express but like I said, he is a good guy.  I don't care about or subscribe to systems and Luengyeh, so very well states numerous times on the board.  I wish Stephen would change a little and just become a sponsor and sell his books.  IMO, forcing or pushing your 'work of art' will only have detrimental repercussions.  Everything will come out and be very visible in the long run and we all know very well that the long run will be here a lot quicker than we actually wanted to be, seriously and absolutely.

Quote from: Gizmotron on June 24, 2017, 01:10:26 PM
I've got your tome too Glen. Do you want that published? Remember that PDF of your dreams? How do you think I figured out that you are a control freak? It was your PM's and emails. You did all this.


BTW, I have no partner, ("and he partnered up with another guy down at the Garden restaurant ").


Not only is that a lie, you are suggesting a conspiracy to commit fraud. Are you actually attempting to make a false accusation here? You had better back that up. I guess it's not cyber-stalking if the mystery man gave you my private emails. But when you fabricate an accusation of a crime you open yourself to investigation. Just how rich are you?

Mark, i said it was a story, two guys talking at a casino, a story.  What you did with another on this board is your business, his business and I might (just, might) be privy to the details (7 hours), but Mark, i mentioned a story with the owner of The Garden Restaurant.  Whatever you want to interpret that as about is okay.

Quote from: Stephen Tabone on June 24, 2017, 03:00:41 PM
I've received the following from a member via email:

"1. How many decks in these three shoes? the results are, 74, 74, 73 these can't be 6 deck, too many and no ties.

. Also note too how there are few runs of Bank and or Player on all thee shoes and how there are no long runs of either Bank or Player.

Also note how the structure of each shoe are similar to each other as if someone had sat down and written them! Please post this."

Here are three more shoes i did not delete yet from 6-10.

http://betselection.cc/alrelax's-blog/3-live-shoes-6-10-17/

Here are a couple I had posted from 6-11.

One of you problems is you do not go on and read other peoples threads and stuff. 

What problems are you going to find with these, you joined the board here i think on the 8th, and you and i were exchanging friendly pm's a emails, I did not have any problem with you when you joined, the only problem i have is you called me a lair and submitting fake score cards to discredit you.  I have no reason, none, to discredit you.  That is what the problem is and that will never go away. You sided with seemly people on the board here that claim there are not even ties in my 3 shoes, the 3 shoes that are in question!!!!!  Seriously, screw me--no ties because AD excluded the ties, don't you have the original scans that AD used???

Maybe these don't match up to your system, IDK???  But they are real shoes form a live casino.

http://betselection.cc/alrelax's-blog/6-11-live-shoes/

There is one i posted from the casino when it finished.  About a week ago??  Run that.  It was strong.  If you have not seen strong and repeatedly strong and then weak and then a combination of the two in every way shape and form, you have not played thousands of shoes, sorry.  IMO.


http://betselection.cc/baccarat-forum/20k-plus-shoe-just-now!!/

Quote from: Stephen Tabone on June 24, 2017, 05:26:00 PM
Why don't you take photos of full board  shoe results when you are at casinos rather than doing what you did? Then we can see the board and write down the results to use.

I did with the one I won nearly $30k along with a card I used.  It was on this board.  They will not allow photos and i had to really pull strings to take that.  In Vegas and some places, some casinos do not mind and long as you are not photographing people openly.  But most will not allow you to, they get highly upset Stephen and i am dead on serious.  In fact to take the picture of the board the floor manager had to call security and the GM, they said yes, but just for that one shoe.  The frown on it and will not allow it. Maybe your casinos say okay, not many over here will. 

Quote from: Stephen Tabone on June 24, 2017, 05:23:16 PM
So you posted three shoes that slaughter my strategy. Didn't you stop to think, hang on, why am I only posting three shoes, all bad, why can't I post more shoes that show wins! All losers? The structure of the results are totally against my strategy. If the shoe results are true, then this has to be utter sheer coincidence. But the fact that you had posted them, only three shoes, you really should explain yourself. It is not for me to say 100% that you faked them. It is for you to tell the truth. If they are not fake then why just three and all bad. Did it not cross your mind that you would not be challenged on this?

I played the other night, those are from that night, AD wanted them, I played I posted them.  I just posted one and very skeptical to post more but i did it for the member PPKKINT in baccarat thread and my triggers--took the time to explain him, it was a great shoe for me.  Some luck at the end, I completed tow 1-3-2-6 progression on 3 and 4 and cut.  I have plenty of other shoes posted either in my blog or baccarat room, go look.  I have some at home, (at office now) i usually do not keep them or even take the cards from the casinos.  A few people were asking for live shoes that is why i posted those.  I honestly do not know your system more than win 3 and stop and stop loss of 6.  I don't subscribe to a mechanical system, i come at a bac shoe from all directions, strong, weak, chop, cut, etc.  Not one way. 

I lost all respect for you and tried to maintain a neutral position.  You accused me of being a lair.  You suck, plain and simple. 

Quote from: alrelax on June 24, 2017, 05:09:46 PM
Stephen, so you are claiming those 3 shoes were made up by me and they are fake and conceived to discredit your expert research and system, is that correct???

Please answer this.

Stephen, so you are claiming those 3 shoes were made up by me and they are fake and conceived to discredit your expert research and system, is that correct???

Quote from: Stephen Tabone on June 24, 2017, 04:02:45 PM
When you get approx 3.6 (sets of 22x) more P/B runs more than zigzag runs over three shoes that someone posts (=81x more!) you first need to 'ask questions' before making further tweaks. The game play and added tweaks are strong enough. These shoes...are very questionable. The knives were out to get me, (as advised by some members) I know that, at the time these were posted, therefore I really cannot accept them as stand alone. The fact that there were no good shoes that showed TUBS in a good light posted means that no one reader can take these 3 shoes as gospel.

Again I write, individuals should take down their own results and apply them. To merely reply on other persons shoe results is meaningless. No one serious about winning would judge a strategy based on what others claim. S/he must check a strategy against results s/he knows to be true. Otherwise what you'll find on here is 'bear baiting' against me. Though I might be a bear, in defending my strategy I'm certainly not a chained one, to accept claims. I'm a free thinker and therefore am not bound to masters who mistreat in order to satisfy themselves and or the crowd, you readers.

Over the space of a few days, 18th -21st June 2017, the mob (double faced) in order to try and discredit my strategy went onto Amazon and left negative reviews (not a good word to say about it! That I think says more about themselves). The mob clearly planned this and did so to protect their friend's $1,000 workshop in Vegas as other members had advised me about what is going on (then the mob leader takes them to casinos to lose: and he get commission from their loses).

And then you get these doggy shoe results to try and put others off from looking into my strategy! these people will do/say anything to protect their mob leader. My guess is that they don't even gamble, they don't bet on baccarat for real but just pretend to. Readers should make up their own minds. As of today my book is still #1 on baccarat on Amazon. (currently on sale: click on the link below) 2.1 will be out soon, followed by 3.0 which everyone is waiting for.

I have no idea what seminar or person you are talking about or others are referring to.  I was going to start a full time business as I told you and the State of Nevada's Post Secondary Education official agencies documents are posted within my Blog showing how they would not give me an exception/waiver to having official teachers, backgrounds checks, fingerprinting, fee, course outlines etc., the same as a private school or a dealer school.  Their state certified consultants and annalists cited, my course content would have great leverage and educational advancement for anyone taking it if they were employed at a casino.  However, don't get me wrong, I was not teach or seminar about system and strictly bet placement, etc.  Otherwise they told me, there would be a waiver and no regulation because systems and bet placement method seminars are outside of the regulatory realm, etc.  So, I am not operating a business so I hope you are NOT referring to me in what you quote.

I ahve no interest or concern with anyone's books, except if it benefits me or i can profit from it.  But what does bother me is how you have literally and written wise, accused me of submitting fake score cards to discredit you (with the knives in my hand), seriously??