Robert Di Nero as the Tangiers casino president in the 1995 movie Casino, said it very well in the beginning of the movie.  You guys know what he said, I don't have to repeat it. 

Quote from: Slacker on September 19, 2014, 12:44:05 PM
Agreed. It's very annoying, and should take priority.

I second and/or third this, it is annoying!

The numbers if played that way will generally (generally) get a 2 or 3 hit success.  Play $25 chips each, lose $1.750.00 and win either $1,750.00 or $2,625.00.  The odds of winning more than 3 drastically are against you.  If you win some 2's and then a 3 or so and an occasional 4---out of the sets of 5 of the same numbers played, you will probably break even or lose a little.

Nice try thou.

There is NOTHING 'very safe to play' in the casino.

Quote from: deepspace on November 02, 2014, 09:30:58 PM


, and  0 loses



Cheers!

My English is poor too, I was raised in the Bronx.  But 0 loses mean, you never lost.

Another system with zero losses!!!  I am on the wrong side of 'living life'!

I will pay for this guy to go back to prison, I will send a guard a cell phone with a baccarat app preloaded, I will juice the guard, I will provide a full commissary account and the guy will retire nicely when he teaches me zero losses when he gets out.

My phone number is 1-800-Live-Easy.

Deviation that works into balance, but subjective and unpredictable in short term casino play.

One of the smartest things I ever read on here.  I Said (1) of, not the only.

Devil's advocate.  If it's 'not certain' as you say, then what good is it.  It is still a hunch, a maybe, a might do this or a might do that outcome. Stay well, keep up the great work! 

Quote from: esoito on January 14, 2014, 12:02:06 AM
If this keeps up then poor Weddings will wonder why he ever bothered with his offer in the first place!

Yes, yes. I know. Due diligence and all that. Very important.  But if you start with just a 5 quid/dollar/euro stake you're hardly going to lose the house.

If it's a scam (I don't think it is) then aren't there easier and more lucrative ways to defraud people?

And if it's a scam then Weddings has had infinite patience during his membership here before chucking out the groundbait.

Trouble is, everyone is basically so gun-shy because of all the scams that proliferate the internet that it makes it difficult to discern when an offer is genuine and OK.

But isn't it worth kicking in a small stake -- perhaps the cost of a hamburger -- if only to see what happens? 

If you think not, then keep your powder dry and walk away. Nobody is being compelled to do anything.

At the end of the day it's your choice.

Does anyone know the story about the famous (infamous) attorney in New York City named 'Marc Dreier'?   He sold over $700 Million Dollars (USD) of real estate promissory notes from huge real estate developers in Manhattan that were worth Billions of dollars themselves.  Only problem was, all the promissory notes were fake, forged and not from the Billion dollar real estate developer.  It sure looked like a great deal to the hedge funds and investors buying them. 

"......Marc Dreier was the sole equity partner owner, controlled all of the firm's finances........."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Stuart_Dreier

Quote from: Sputnik on October 24, 2014, 05:05:00 PM
I once read a topic about a guy show post the names of 200 systems - he wanted to trade and non of the 200 system made him a winner.

Not 1 valid rock solid system to clock the casino in a library of 200??  Wow, blows my mind, can't understand that one!

Never heard of the $35 atm fee yet.  I run front money wherever I play in Vegas, when I escape the property and run somewhere else and need cash for whatever, I hit an ATM with a debit card.  Never been charged more than a couple of dollars.  Unless you are referring to the pick up the phone and get an advance deal, I never heard of ATM's that charge $35.00.  Any megaresort, Bellagio, PH, Wynn, Mirage, all the shopping malls, etc., all have tons of ATM's that will be $1.95 or $2.95 or so. 

Quote from: Bayes on October 24, 2014, 11:24:08 AM


>>>>>>1) However, this objectivity is more apparent than actual. The definition of probability on this view is "The relative frequency of occurrence of an event after an infinite number of similar trials has occurred".


>>>>>>2)The second problem with relative frequencies is that they cannot apply to unique events.

Okay, I do read your 'stuff'.  But here.  Any system would have to have a 'trigger' NO?  And, any systems would have to have that trigger based on something, NO?  Which would have to be past events?? NO?  Although I am no Dr. Spock or Eisenstein, you are basing your decisions on past performance and what has happened.  Although, I will give you, that the other sides or possible numbers have to eventually come up, you are still predicating and that is without certainty.  And that is my point.  No better than 21 year old pimple face Joey from California blowing his $250.00 birthday present his daddy gave him. 

Next, someone will tell me there is absolute truth to Gypsy Fortune Tellers.   [smiley]aes/thinking.png[/smiley]

Oh don't get me wrong, I would definitely read through it, there are lull's at work too.  But seriously I would!  After all I am not growing spinach in a swamp yet while playing the accordion or whatever the Floridian remarked.

I always have something constructive to do like cleaning up sulfuric acid or formaldehyde or up righting a tractor trailer lying across the interstate.  LOL. 

Got to go, my accordion is waiting out in my spinach patch. [smiley]aes/joking.png[/smiley]

Better get a lot of extra cyberspace to warehouse that one!