Banker had 2 times, 3 IAR and the third cards for the first 3IAR were a 6-8-9 in that order. The only other guy and myself say to each other, that 7 is coming, look we had 3 perfect setups for an F7 win if we got a 7 card on any of those 3rd ones. Then the second 3 IAR, the third cards for that 3 IAR were a 6-9-8 in that order. Another perfect set of 3 chances if we only got a 7.
This was the beginning of the shoe. The first 3 hands were 3 IAR banker, then a player, then a banker, then a player, then 2 bankers, then a player, then the second set of 3 IAR bankers came.
Only the other guy and myself at the table playing. We were both betting max Fortune 7 each time. So like 12 hands were out now. I looked at him and said, what do you think? He shrugs his shoulders and says, no feeling. He places min wager on both the players and the bankers and a very small F7 wager. It was a tie. He does it again, and it was a players win. I sat out both times.
After that second time, I was like, this isn't going anywhere. I wagered bankers side but no F7 wager. The other guy playing is back on banker and max F7 wager. Dealer deals. Players have an 8 and a 2. Bankers have 2 face cards. Players third card is a 6. Bankers third card was a friggin 7 for the F7 win.
Why is it almost always like this? The first hand sitting the F7 wager out and it appears. Happens quite frequently IMO. Not just with F7 wagers, but with increased large wagers on P or B and also ties, etc, etc.
Some type of phenomenon I guess. One of many, within an actual B&M bac shoe when you really think about it.
This was the beginning of the shoe. The first 3 hands were 3 IAR banker, then a player, then a banker, then a player, then 2 bankers, then a player, then the second set of 3 IAR bankers came.
Only the other guy and myself at the table playing. We were both betting max Fortune 7 each time. So like 12 hands were out now. I looked at him and said, what do you think? He shrugs his shoulders and says, no feeling. He places min wager on both the players and the bankers and a very small F7 wager. It was a tie. He does it again, and it was a players win. I sat out both times.
After that second time, I was like, this isn't going anywhere. I wagered bankers side but no F7 wager. The other guy playing is back on banker and max F7 wager. Dealer deals. Players have an 8 and a 2. Bankers have 2 face cards. Players third card is a 6. Bankers third card was a friggin 7 for the F7 win.
Why is it almost always like this? The first hand sitting the F7 wager out and it appears. Happens quite frequently IMO. Not just with F7 wagers, but with increased large wagers on P or B and also ties, etc, etc.
Some type of phenomenon I guess. One of many, within an actual B&M bac shoe when you really think about it.