You know when you come to think about it, any system of playing with or without progressions can be claimed to be won in the long run. As long as you always do the same thing and you play until you get ahead. In other words beating randomness.
Just say I'm flat betting on Banker and in the long run I have to win (at some point of course), so i can simply label it a holy grail. I could say flat betting Banker is a holy grail and I'm going to keep betting Banker every single hand and just play shoe after shoe, week after week and at some point I am going to be ahead. And at that point I can stop and say my flat betting system on banker works. I can do the same thing by betting on Player only as well. I can do the same thing betting every 5th or 10th hand, etc., etc. I could do the same thing by betting every Player or Banker after every natural comes out.
Because I'm going to stop after I get ahead by a certain amount of units and it's always going to be that way. But do you have enough bankroll to fund that and do you have the willpower not to increase your bets once you start winning?
Just say I'm flat betting on Banker and in the long run I have to win (at some point of course), so i can simply label it a holy grail. I could say flat betting Banker is a holy grail and I'm going to keep betting Banker every single hand and just play shoe after shoe, week after week and at some point I am going to be ahead. And at that point I can stop and say my flat betting system on banker works. I can do the same thing by betting on Player only as well. I can do the same thing betting every 5th or 10th hand, etc., etc. I could do the same thing by betting every Player or Banker after every natural comes out.
Because I'm going to stop after I get ahead by a certain amount of units and it's always going to be that way. But do you have enough bankroll to fund that and do you have the willpower not to increase your bets once you start winning?