Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!

Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - plolp

#76
Quote from: Nickmsi on June 02, 2016, 07:12:13 PM
Hi Plop . .

I ran your numbers through my bot for roulette (1=B, 0=R) and got a -4 result.

Hope this is what you wanted.

Nick

this is the procedure that interests me . Not the résult.

Thanks
#77
@ Big Ez
Can you show how you doing with that?

0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
1    random .org   

Thanks
#78
I think there is a problem with the tracker RNG
it does not mark some gains

20         B
5   NB      R
28   NB      B
16   NB      R
6   NB      B    here , no profit ???

#79
Thanks for the program Nick.

Why continue to 9?when you win 123

is what the theorem says that there may be  2 AP ?  I do not think so
#80
Quote from: Nickmsi on May 30, 2016, 06:06:26 PM




Using MATH (VDW) you will have a winner within 9 spins/hands.  No doubt about it.  Always.




No

1  B
2  R
3  R
4  B   Lost
5  R     no bet
6  R     no bet
7  R    no bet         no gain what are you doing now
#81
Roulette Forum / Re: Priyanka. random thoughts
May 15, 2016, 03:03:01 PM
So that everything is clear (about "vdw")

You can predict red or black ,it will always a AP

even if you do not see it, it is there .

Exemple : B R B R
                    A A A   ( A = alternation )

An other :   R B B R R   normally you should play red 

but ;     if you take two ( RB =Opposite)

                     R B B R R   you must play  black
                       O    O       
#82
Roulette Forum / Re: Priyanka. random thoughts
May 12, 2016, 07:48:04 AM
Quote from: soxfan on May 11, 2016, 10:20:16 PM
Has it been established that there are limits to the random, hey hey?

For the DZ :    we need 4 rounds  to see a repeat

It's a fact  .

is what one can say that it is a " limits to the random " ?
#83
Roulette Forum / Re: Priyanka. random thoughts
May 11, 2016, 10:17:45 AM
Quote from: Nickmsi on May 09, 2016, 04:28:09 AM
Hi Sumit . .

Priyanka thread "Random Thoughts" is about another way to play roulette.  As I gather there were only 2 ways to play in the past.

1. Random systems, ie, waiting for something to happen, a sleeper to awake, a number to repeat, a pattern to form, etc.

2.  Non Random systems, like Physics, where you play a wheel's bias.

Priyanka says there is a third way.

3.  A non random system played  with Math and Statistics.  Instead of waiting for an event, you are playing for a math theorem to fulfill or complete.  For example, the Van de Waerden theorem says that in 9 spins an EC will form one of 16 Arithmetic Progressions.  So you play each spin to see if it completes an Arithmetic Progression. That is Non random.

That's the basics of it.  Pretty interesting insights.

Nick


It is not really good news ....
Whatever the order of spins,
this theorem is true.
So it's always random .
#84
Roulette Forum / Re: bet selection for columns (ND)
January 24, 2016, 01:58:42 PM
T2  wiesbaden : -28 / 216 spins    yesterday
#85
Roulette Forum / Re: bet selection for columns (ND)
January 23, 2016, 12:25:36 PM
Quote from: greenguy on January 23, 2016, 12:11:14 PM

Seems about right.



There are greater catastrophe, it's true!
#86
Roulette Forum / Re: bet selection for columns (ND)
January 23, 2016, 12:19:43 PM
With this method you always play the first column, there is no reason for it.
let's say you find a reason for it while playing only the first column you would earn more than playing both.
You lose one token plus all 37.
#87
Roulette Forum / Re: bet selection for columns (ND)
January 23, 2016, 11:59:24 AM
for information only:

T1 Wiesbaden yesterday : +9 (133 spins)
T2__________________:  +1 (210 spins)
T3 __________________: -55 (361 spins)
#88
Roulette Forum / Re: bet selection for columns (ND)
January 22, 2016, 02:38:25 PM
I did the test with the rules that are given.
The fact that it destroys my messages completely discredits his method.

Quote from: Gizmotron on January 22, 2016, 02:17:43 PM
I guess you blazed right on through betting into a bad effectiveness streak. Maybe you never bothered checking for the three states of effectiveness. That's OK. Somebody has to pay to keep the lights on.

You can wait states supposedly favorable but that does not change anything.
Your permanence of spins played resemble in all respects to any permanence
#89
Roulette Forum / bet selection for columns (ND)
January 22, 2016, 02:09:31 PM
as all my posts are deleted with "nathan detroit" I place it here.

I just gave a result on the T1 wiesbaden yesterday;
-14 To 89 spins
#90
Quote from: NathanDetroit on January 18, 2016, 07:27:54 PM
follow the colors  RED  or Black.

RED shows bet 1st and 3rd column

BLACK shows bet 1 st and second Column.


FLAT  BET only. 


For recreational purposes only Play at your own risk.



Original idea by SPIKE (ca012)


This makes little sense here is to always play the first column regardless of the color output.
It would be better to bet on the third column when red hit and the second column when black hit.

It is easier to manage and more economical.