turbogenius said this:

Quote from: turbogenius
Any number has a 1 in 37 chance of appearing during a cycle of spins.
That means that any number on average will show up once per 37 spins.... we can all agree with this right ?
But no.. as you can test and prove to yourself - 24 numbers appear on average every 37 spins, not 37. There never will be 37 possible outcomes... just because there are 37 numbers and 37 spins in a cycle and each spin is independent - there will never be 37 numbers that show once and no repeats.
Now grab the eraser and make it every number has a 1 in 24 chance of appearing ?
You could do this or you could take this info and look into repeaters....
I said it until I'm blue in other posts. A number can't show twice unless it's shown once, it can't show 3 times unless it's shown twice, etc..
And most importantly - you can never lose a single unit on any number that doesn't appear because you never bet on it.

can we say turbogenius hot numbers method is to bet the numbers that appeared? to be bet as they appear. at the same time to stop betting when it becomes a number that does not appear by his definition? this way you always bet on appearing numbers only .would the turbogenius number cycle be 24 spins to apply this method? to bet each number appeared during 24 spins.  if it reappears give the number a 24 spins run again every time but stop betting when it disappears during 24 spins.

whole topic: https://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=19732.0

https://www.google.com/search?q=roulette+strike+strategy+pdf

RouletteStrikeStrategy-bk.pdf

after passing all the blah blah blah page # 94 has the strategy . you must bet one column + one ds using the progression published on page # 99.

LaMarca's Power Roulette Strategy

http://www.gamblersbookcase.com/PowerRoulette/DnLPRS53006bkd/LaMarcasPowerRouletteManual.pdf

Quote$35 Is All The Bankroll You Need to Win $1,110 an Hour With the Packer Progression!

http://www.gamblersbookcase.com/PackerProgression/dnPackProg887rfGvmd3i92W/PackerProgression.pdf

REWARD System – For Even Money Bet in Roulette;

http://www.loothog.com/xtreme/Reward_System.pdf

Power matrix roulette system pdf download:

https://www.slideshare.net/carrielashawn/power-matrix-48170299

https://www.scribd.com/doc/265376831/Power-Matrix-Roulette-System

If you have an opinion about the method please reply or send it to me by private message. thank you.

I often notice that people who play EC whatever the game tend to be more concerned and pay more attention to streaks, timing and others . is it due to the volatility that it can go in any direction at any time?

I also notice that people who play with more numbers than even chances have a confidence because they have the advantage of the probabilities in the next hand. Is this really justified?? should you not be even more cautious and be more attached to tracking the swings of the game because you can lose more too??  maybe the even chances are the right point where people do not need to worry about having more or less chance of winning or losing because it is basically the same. maybe this psychological factor of having equal odds plays a part in the EC players to be more aware because at any moment it changes as motivation to be more alert because that is the nature of all EC bets. what do you think?

Which side are you on?

I like both forms and I really like to combine the frequent events from the common game results with the events of a great potential when the signals are appearing . it is not very hard: for example with EC you can bet on the small series with 1,2,4 for many small wins. then when you lose your progression it can be a signal to aim for the long series to win big.

how do you exploit the events of frequent appearance and the events of little appearance but with great profit potential? Thank you.

there is something that bothers me for a long time: how to test a system in an appropriate way? maybe someone here can share when can you say that a system is really a winning system......

if someone has an answer about location name vs number of spins each it would be much appreciated. I know that a two dozen system should be tested differently from one of two quads . the details of how many spins to test each betting location to say it is a winning system would be good to know if someone has it figured out. thank you.

this forum is broke friends . they do not have to renew the 2017-2018 domain name fee. time to leave this forum behind.

web pages to prepare for the inevitable:

http://forum.roulette30.com
https://rouletteforum.cc
http://www.rouletteforum.com/
https://www.gamblingforums.com/forums/roulette-forum.9/

it was a good trip but we all  saw it coming. no money = no gas to continue.

Steve's forums sells = success
Kav's forum parners with casinos = success.
Betselection = church offerings basket = broke.



nonsense

Bye.

delectus said:

Quote from: delectus on September 14, 2017, 07:47:21 AM
Please note the random numbers at random.org and say an actual roulette wheel produce completely
different results. I have worked on random numbers for a great many years and I am currently looking
at the results for sets, when using random.org random numbers. It is interesting to discover the differences
and try to discover why there should be such a difference.

also

Quote from: delectus on September 16, 2017, 01:15:27 PM
Anyone who has bet on sleepers ( 3 x 37 = 111 spins is "officially" a sleeper), will be often aware
that irritatingly, the ball will land often either side of a sleeping number, say 1 & 16 the sleeper being 33.

A possible interesting research may be to examine random.org sleepers, this may point to some
differences, such as the above and when a sleeper appears.

there are random.org and automated roulette numbers easily accessible on the internet.  could you do a step by step comparison on the differences found between two of these samples complete with statistics? this topic is interesting to me because I do not see anything different but I remain open to being proved otherwise. thank you.

This method looks good to conduct long term study . progression analysis would be interesting.

QuoteAuthor   Topic: A method with teeth
   kj smooth   Posted: 04-Sep-10 20:14   
   
I know some will play this and I'll never hear a word from them, I accept that. Some might even rip the method AND still play it. lol This is flat betting. I use units of $15, $10 and $5 but use whatever fits your budget the best. I try and separate fact from opinion. A fact is, in 'X' number of spins, we will get a complete street hit, all 3 numbers. I do have to thank Bayes ahead of time, he helped me a bit.

Ok, on to the method >> I keep track of the last *12* numbers hit. When the next number hits, cross off the latest number, we will always be looking at the LAST 12. Any street with TWO of the numbers hit, is what we are looking for. Example: the 14 and 15 are hit within the 12 recorded. We flat bet the 13 UNTIL either a win OR until either the 14 or 15 is NOT within the 12 recorded anymore. I have done lots of testing recording the last 11, 10, 13 and 14 spins, I have found that *12* works the best. Anytime all 3 (a win) are within the 12, no more betting on that number UNTIL it drops back to two within the street.

EXAMPLE: We were betting on the 13, it hits and we have a win. Lets say a couple spins later, the 14 drops from the last 12 recorded. We NOW have the 13 and 15 hit so we bet on the 14 until either a win OR until either the 13 or 15 is NOT within 12 recorded anymore. Don't make this tougher than it is. Sometimes I over explain stuff. lol There are some spins where NO betting will take place. Now, what about multiple bets going on? This is what I do in terms of betting. 1-2 bets: I bet $15 per number, 3 bets: I bet $10 per number, 4+ bets: I bet $5 per number. It is very rare to have 4+ within 12 but you MUST have a RULE for every situation.

My BR is 3K but use what you can afford. No progression here, that should make a few happy. Its VERY common for a street to hit within a short (12) period of time. What I like about this most, we are NOT betting on semi-cold streets. My win goal is 1K, then go home. Any questions, just ask. Thanks for reading. Ken

http://www.gamblersglen.com/cgi-bin/teemz/teemz.cgi?board=_master&action=opentopic&topic=8755&forum=Roulette_Message_Board

Link to google:

https://www.google.com/search?q=inurl:gamblersbookcase.com+filetype:pdf

I wrote this today: http://betselection.cc/general-discussion/alrelax-and-his-petty-poll/msg57211/#msg57211

and I feel entitled to speak because I was one of several members who committed to support and I supported with my money by the first week of April as alrelax himself said: http://betselection.cc/general-discussion/pledges-to-betselection-cc/

after defending alrelax from greenguy today I started to think that I can not assure that he gave it. the pledge carries a part of honor so I am 100% sure that I gave my part but although it would be despicable not to have fulfilled the pledge it is within the possible.

Please confirm to the forum that alrelax fulfilled his pledge to be able to speak properly and to defend him again knowing that I will not end up like a fool putting my hands in the fire for him without having all the facts.

because we made the compromise in public so we put our honor in the same line the confirmation must be public too. any of the other members who committed themselves can also confirm if you want.  there should be no problem because we made a very public commitment and not a private business or coverup.

In any case for speaking clearly if he did not honor his part after three months it is simply that he does not want to help the forum which would be disgusting . or else if he does not have funds to afford $ 50 USD after these several months then all claims of moving money at the casinos and so on crash. which also reminds me that I suspect tabone smells suspicious as a big bettor author. well let's hope that alrelax does not disappoint. thanks.

How many spins back should be used to say that a bet is:

* Hot
* Warm
* Cold

what is the universal formula to calculate this? Be it baccarat or roulette or another game. if you can back it up with math the better. Thank you.

Recommended to do live testing. endures long sessions without disconnection.

http://www.liveroulette.ie/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_d_2HI7TyjA

Can anyone give the short version of what is happening? I have not visited the forum for days and I do not feel like reading 200 posts to find out.

If someone has it mastered please answer this. Is the method good? how many spins have you tested? how many units per spin is the total average in your tests? where is the testing program if someone has posted it here or in some other forum. Just the substance please, no time for dramas . thank you.

Arxiv is a page about technical topics such as physics where you can find some roulette PDF downloads such as:

Predicting the outcome of roulette
https://arxiv.org/abs/1204.6412

Biased Roulette Wheel: A Quantitative Trading Strategy Approach
https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.09601

others:
https://arxiv.org/find/all/1/all:+roulette/0/1/0/all/0/1

Routledge International Handbook of Internet Gambling:

http://dspace.ubvu.vu.nl/bitstream/handle/1871/38363/Regulation%26Reputation.Gibraltar.Handbook.2012.pdf?sequence=1

Maybe there is something new for someone:

http://www.geocities.ws/roulette/

Recently a topic discussing one of the presidential candidates was erased. one always wonders if one candidate is favored over the other. careful with this: for many to erase the thread is their answer ............ I better stop here.

Although it is my blog I ask: please do not mention names of any of the candidates in this thread. would like opinions about the fact and not the content. thank you.

Even though you never want it to happen systems always appear to run out over time. The method that was ravaging last month can hardly stand this month or it is outright in loss.

What is your advice? should we put it away and find another new method? should we make incremental tweaks to bring the method back and try again the next month or next year?

Throughout my life I have used many systems. it always comes a time when I wonder why continue with a system that is losing. It happens to all.  what is your suggestion for dealing with this?  Thank you very much for your opinion.

what is the maximum amount of numbers to be covered by a roulette bet according to you ?.

It is not about having a hit , or we simply cover 37 numbers and guess right all the time. This is referred to capturing winning numbers at a pace that allows the player to use a progression without getting out of hand, or if possible to win more than you lose consistently.

An interesting trick to locate PDF files on google about gambling lies in adding "filetype: pdf" to the search term.

You can find a little bit of everything: essays from universities, crass advertisements and even commercial systems at no cost.

roulette system filetype:pdf
https://www.google.co.ve/search?q=roulette+system+filetype:pdf

baccarat system filetype:pdf
https://www.google.co.ve/search?q=baccarat+system+filetype:pdf

gambling system filetype:pdf
https://www.google.co.ve/search?q=gambling+system+filetype:pdf