Quote from: gold1981 on August 17, 2015, 12:35:10 PM
Hi , was looking for an effective roulette software, Just came across roulettechechmate site and they says i can make $2000 per hour with their RCN1, which worths 500 euros, i think if this can really produce $2000 per hours as claimed then its worths it but need real users experience with this people as i want to knw if i can go for it or just forget it...

Friends, this message has already been published as another author in other forums.

http://www.rouletteforum.com/viewthread/17721/

Quote@ ikibun, if you wanna promote your software here, man up ,stop pretending to be inocent cretin and explain why you think your software worth 500. And how it gonna help average looser to loose less/ more... ets.
Good start would be detailed list of what software actually does and based on wich algorithms.

The message was deleted from Roulette forum.cc , but you can see the google cache version:

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=15821.0

This is most likely the software creator promoting the product passing as an interested user expecting others real users to follow.

We had discussed this topic here:

http://betselection.cc/roulette-forum/1-winning-roulette-software-with-number-prediction-for-beating-any-roulette/

Quote from: JesperThe casino is on 1centroulette.com.
They claim have minbet of 1 dollarcent and NO MAXBET.
They claim you can deposit 0.05 Dollars, and withdraw the same INSTANTLY.

I register, play some in the funmode. 

I  am not sure but think it is an Israelian casino.
I do not know more, and do not know if it is serious,  any has tried, or have some information?

It is really clear: if you control the outcome, you can accept any amount bet against you.

It is a no brainer.

Remote viewing is worse than numerology. At least in numerology there is a way to objectively prove that their theories such as 13-31 or numerical triangles do not give the advantage.

These doctrines of the view of numbers in the mind is pure hearsay: talk to spirits, clairvoyance and others such are worse than numerologist ones. They can not even be objectively proven because if they fail for your tests then you did not do the correct work . you are not in the right state of mind, you do not possess the correct open chakra , or the evil spirits of the hereafter do not like you enough ... or go figure.

What a sad thing to see that people give credit to stuff where numerical actuals are irrelevant for any testing . the only thing for which the remote viewing can be useful is when you want to change channels and it is beside the couch.

Bayes said this:

QuoteRegarding diversification, it's just a fancy way of saying "don't put all your eggs in one basket". A  simple example in roulette which FLAT posted would be to bet 3 units on an even chance. There are lots of ways of doing it, but instead of putting 3 units on red,  you would put one unit on each of 3 sixlines, the first being the "coldest", the second the "hottest", and the 3rd "average". The variance is reduced compared to betting only on red, even though the return is the same.

maybe I am not reading the implications correctly? This is a discovery of major proportions if kept as stable. To win the variance is a way to earn money with progressions although not having more than normal game wins.

This should be discussed thoroughly.

I am guilty of having deleted messages on my other threads precisely because I wanted the continuity of the topic.

Maybe the posts be valid but if they have nothing to do with the discussion then the creator of the thread has every right to send a message to remove the erratic post. Well , this is my opinion.

without a doubt I prefer a forum where I can delete over one where I have to swallow everything another person pleases to publish in my topics .  be it relevant with regards to him or not. it is my topic and I like to retain the power to say what course it will take.. Maybe I am a control freak.

This idea intrigues me cyclically. I recently was at the casino and saw a man playing at another table. While everyone is betting on the numbers, he gambled dozens. It caught my attention because he added a chip on each spin. mmm it is a unintelligent system which pays 2-1, he is increasing more than what is required.

The truth is that when he won back top bets he earned more, up a chip of it at a time makes more money. I saw no rhyme or reason to the dozens he chose. It was not the most sleepy. Nor was always the last dozen spun. At times he won but continued to rise only to drop back after a hit.

It was earning well, perhaps thinking he had the ultimate winner with that over-betting system. It recalled me this question of systems may expire per person.

Was it not possible to obtain information from the previous site on the internet? In some applications of privacy there is one such option to hide the site referred to the previous page or something. I have seen it in several.

As I understand it to learn the former site on which the visitor was there is no need to change anything on the website links. Maybe they just see this to give credit to members of the casino affiliate company and not look like a promotional link.

Playing system by Ahcoln. Year 2005.

Quote
The one Ahcoln has chosen and the one, which will be given in this newsletter is simply follow the last decision.  In Roulette, that would mean to bet Red if the last decision was Red and to bet Black if the last decision was Black.  On a Green zero, you skip the next bet.  The examples that will be given here will also be for Roulette for bets placed on Odd and Even.

The Super Recoup uses three betting stages.

- The "N"ormal stage
- The "R"ecoup stage
- The "P"arlay stage

Inside the attached .zip file below there is a file with the full system.

Betvoyager went to junk after their changes in non-zero roulette. Without the incentive it is now just the same to play at any other casino roulette if you use their European game, so they are not as important now as an alternate source. At former times they were king.

There are other RNG casinos with attractive limits and pennies as well. Not to mention the attractiveness of live games commonly offered by competitors. They shot themselves in the foot by changing the original rules of their attractive non-zero game. It is my personal opinion on it.

Quote from: alrelax on December 21, 2014, 01:36:32 PMNot just in gambling but in everyday matters as well.

I share the observation. but I got to the article by chance and not by looking for that in google. Perhaps this is a trend around the world but Asians themselves do not see the comparison because the simple reason that they live surrounded by this as their normal state of existence. A point to ponder.

We have seen alrelax publishing about many topics. perhaps I was just waiting for a message that the transfer has already happened with the benefit for the forum announced? maybe we can not but assume that the $ 30 USD transfer has not taken place yet?

If it is so I would like to know the name of the bank that takes a month to make a transfer within the same country to never use that bank in case of a ransom request by a kidnapper.

It is funny but if there had been no reactions to the accusation of rolex-watch about the welshing it would not have aroused my curiosity. I am a big fan of a just vengeance.

Why begging? I myself will try to make the programming in basic256. This system by Ignatus has really motivated me. It will do as a good learning experience and do as a challenge because it is based on the wheel disc.

http://www.betsoftware.cc/wannawin/code-for-general-cluster-ii-by-ignatus/

These systems for the roulette wheel by Ignatus look pretty good. Why are there no programmers motivated to do them? It would be good to see the figures in the long term for the systems.

What a shame. Superstition in gamblers still alive in 2014. A study from this year by the Journal of Gambling Issues:

The mediating effect of depression between superstitious beliefs and problem gambling: a cross-cultural study of Chinese and Caucasians residing in the United States

http://jgi.camh.net/doi/abs/10.4309/jgi.2014.29.10

A month later, what became of all this mess? The first $ 20 USD were for the new site and the other $ 30 USD? Was something bought with them for the benefit of the forum or the money has not been transferred yet after a month? After the grievance to not give the reason to member Rolex-watch became loud we were not told anything else about it or how it ended.