Quote from: BEAT-THE-WHEEL on December 13, 2014, 08:35:16 AMThe prove, is 69red/200spins,
is still a RECORD.
We could fully have faith, that the next 200spins of EC will have at LEAST 69 hit.

It would be interesting to let a generator of random numbers go on in autopilot to see how much is needed for seeing worst. Not to see if it can go worse than 69/200 but to know how many sets are needed to obtain a worse than 69/200 balance because you can be sure that they will be obtained.

I want to know about the names of the year 2004-2006-2008? VIP lounge mainly.  Turbogenius and others.

Ask nickmsi.

Master excel programmer for the forum.

Quote from: warrior on December 11, 2014, 03:17:06 PMI don't want to say to much I might get booted out of this forum . My 7 day ban went to life in prison ha ha.

I do not know how are the internal affairs of the other forums. Myself I am very critical even to the staff and I do not see any changes of access to my account or in my ability to initiate new posts.

I think the staff here is balanced enough to put aside the issues of personal preferences. While the rules are not broken by posting strong profanity or insults I do not think there is a problem in your presence or that of any other member in this forum. That is my perception from years of interacting with staff members from this place.

Do not let the things that were made by the staff of other forums permeate the perception of staff member here. Do not self-exclude from forum participation when no one does anything to your account for no reason.

I myself would be the first to denounce and go away if staff members were a string of tyrants by banning people without doing anything against the rules . only for a personal pretense or personal prejudice. Pleasantly, that is not the case here to the best of my experience over the years.

Quote from: Albalaha on December 10, 2014, 04:05:00 PMA few write "daily systems" without even testing them enough. Will we ever see serious and worthwhile debates with serious simulations, tweaking and finalizing?

Friend, in order to have a serious discussion and draw conclusions we would have to pay programmers. The downside is that nobody wants to pay for programming losers systems because we know the conclusion beforehand. The few systems that can have a chance are scheduled in private by the interested parties and the resulting program is rarely made public.

It is a world of privacy and selfishness but what else can be done with normal thinking. I myself have commanded systems to be programmed I do not make public. Now that I want to learn to program is that I can share freely because it did not cost me money. The truth is that the first thing one thinks after paying out of pocket for programming a method is that it is not fair for the others to benefit having paid nothing, just like that.

Well, let's see if the new website changes things. Not all developers are ready to spend their days programming to give away. In that case Bayes, Esoito, Victor, Nickmsi and the others are special characters in consequence to have them assembled in one place is appreciated but for now they are the exception and not the rule in these forums.

Hopefully we are ready for a year of serious long-term simulations to draw any conclusions of the best systems made public. The programmers deserve their compensation even if the system is a loser. The other option is that we all learn to be programmers to make building a system tester become as common as posting the system but I doubt it. However the attempt can be made.

My suggestion is to fix the 1001 bugs that betselection has and to provide the best forum features to assist discussion of systems. Or rather please give priority to large bugs. They are too many to list. From freezes when unable to write to strange things on the site.

If you do not plan to solve the bugs then the best option would be to restart the forum code from the ground up I guess. Easier said than done for sure.

Maybe it very expensive to develop a web forum software from the beginning? Why not a separate forum where features are placed and users are asked if developed feature works as intended to move on to the next one.

Perhaps by year 2018 we could have a functional forum. I was going to say year 2020 but I subtracted two years because of the new forum for programs is a reality. May we see a new betselection a reality to get two more years of expectations deducted for year 2016. Greetings and I think I speak for all forum members when I say we want only the best for this community over the years to come.

What stops me from playing more for real money is the fact that you know the system is going to fall at any time. There are systems that have worked for me several weeks or even months and then I can not lift them even with roulette viagra.

If there is a system that you knew you would always win I think many of forum members present here would not leave the casino. Just to enjoy the sweetness of success outside. Greetings.

Friend Ignatus, thank you very much for sharing. Can we have the program to test the system in the long run or all tests are performed manually yet? Thank you.

Wow, it is amazing that finally things are taking place. Greenguy warns against this and I really have been guided by impatience to see that there was not really progress until now. Perhaps past events do not mean to say 100% future events in all cases. Maybe only 99%? At least doing a little bit but steadily surely you can get to the finish line.

I am still not totally convinced to see a working program running for this year. Say I am one foot with the Greenguy and another foot standing pleased to see that finally there is movement. You just had to separate webs apparently.

See the new site working at present made me lower my original expectations for 2020: now I will say that l hope for year 2018. Here you have a window of opportunity for redress. Now you begin to have my attention again but nobody wants to turn blue holding the breath. We all want to see a successful product for this community to rival roulette extreme quality and why not: offer improvements over it. if it were the case.

Please receive my good wishes for a successful takeoff and fruition.

Quote from: Sputnik on November 24, 2014, 03:11:48 PM
No need to code, because all systems fail.

Well, but even if it fails the idea would be to see the extremes possible in a number of spins that we face. We all know it is supposed that even the most promising systems falls into a simulator. The idea is to use a simulator to find out what are the common extremes to be seen. it is only my opinion. Greetings and many thanks for sharing your system.

Hello friend, I wanted to ask if you received help making this software? Would it be possible to share the code? It looks a multiple tracker has plenty to extract. Thank you.

Quote from: Mathemagician on November 05, 2014, 12:35:12 PM
If you want to be able to withdraw your money. Which is after all the point of casinos then Never ever take a bonus, no matter how tempting.

Friend. I realize that in the hands of a recreational player bonuses are a weapon for their own destruction. But in the hands of a professional player bonuses are a greater amount of bankroll to provide more resistance to the bad times.  so it might only  be a good thing to have.  After all this second type of player does not play for fun but to eventually reach the point of being able to redeem the bonus voucher while enjoying a higher initial bank for this purpose. In this light then the bonus is an extra help. The problem is that these players will be 1 in a million. For all other players bonuses are pernicious.

What a pleasure to see this. Well done . Bonuses are a booby trap. How nice to see that there are users who are out of the pile and manage to overcome them. Please keep sharing these triumphs which are the triumph of all players as a group. Congratulations.

Richbailey86 explains:

QuoteI have tested several shoes and the "Authors System" has done very well

It is simple, it is a series of 4 bets and a 4 step martingale and goes like this:

bet 1- same as last
bet 2- opposite of last
bet 3- same as last
bet 4- opposite of last

on a loss do 1, 2, 4, 8

- Tweak proposed:

The method of selection of the Authors system for the three even chances used: red and black, even and odd, high and low. Each done separately.

Look at recent results: which one of the three does better? then it is selected to be bet for the next spin.

Progression is carried over the one that has the best results for last spin.

No matter if you win or lose the next spin is reevaluated over recent results to select which of the three has a greater number won in recent spins and then the process repeats.

Quote from: wannawin on August 17, 2014, 04:13:57 AM
That is it. Most likely this is low quality code for connoisseurs but it works. That is what matters to me.

I am nobody in programming and yet I managed to make a tracker. If we all share a little of what we know it will improve group knowledge for all. For sure.

This tutorial will continue on the website www.betsoftware.cc as occupations permit me. Friends: the world of programming is really fantastic. Since months ago using the goto label has opened up a world of better programs made easy. Right now I managed to make a tracker for multiple locations with this command. Basic256 is phenomenal for programming trackers for roulette . no question about it.Just imagine the number of people who withdrew their programming merely for not knowing Basic256.