Congratulations on your success.

We all know that you are honest. It is titanic to get away positive during 6 months in this game. Not many people can say that. I wish you success to multiply many bankrolls and to be sustainable over time.

Quote from: Albalaha on April 26, 2013, 05:50:23 AM
            I think it is tough to find even one. The game is not unbeatable in itself but it can't be beaten in absolute terms. I mean, nothing can win in every probability because even if we cover all 37 numbers, we stand to lose and if we leave even 1-2 numbers uncovered it can kill momentarily. When I talk of a grail, I talk of winning an ordinary session with routine dispersions. If a method can Win more and lose less if you keep playing the same way, it is a grail. This is my way of defining a grail.

Thanks to define the particular grail concept for you.

I agree: Unless it is oneself who spin the numbers to his will there is always the possibility of losing.

From there I think that even if a system is successful for one person it may not be for the neighbor. The most you can get similar to the absolute system would be a system that was successful for many but never for everybody. To accept that others are going to lose is a mandatory thing but if there are many more who win and they finally win enough to cover the total loss counting all players that lose we can speak of grail.

Therein lies the importance of the tests to be public and maybe for the test group to proceed to play as a team to overcome the individual losses.

Friend Sputnik, I completely agree with what you say. The truth can be cruel but it is true.

I myself have experienced what you say: The method that one day is gold but copper next day.

If there is a method that is gold every day I do not think anyone in their right mind who wants to give away for free. It would be very generous or very foolish. And we all know which is not abundant.

Quote from: Albalaha on April 26, 2013, 05:15:22 AM
If I write my Holy Grail, all discussions will end up forever and all readers will run to casinos or play online ones. So for the community to keep running, it is essential that a grail be kept hidden from public eyes.

Interesting position. This line of discussion I wanted to get.
We could say that the action by the owner of publishing the holy grail would be counterproductive for the community?

You know that I do not support the sale of systems but the only way I see to share such a valuable piece would be to sell the holy grail with a confidentiality agreement. But we go back to the question why sell it from a first instance.

Personally I do not think there is a winning system that can be called absolute so I do not think that the discussion in reality can come to an end. Only if declared after all relevant evidence by independent public review of several parts somebody could talk about the absolute winning method. Unfortunately there is only isolated people that claim to have wonderful results for their holy grail without public scrutiny.

It would be good to do a collection of so-called winning systems and make them real long-term tests.

How To Play Automated American Roulette (Casino Gambling)

[attachimg=1]

I like the automated roulettes lately and thought about creating a gallery of pictures of them. Maybe some of you recognize the model. If you like please comment.

[attachimg=1]

[attachimg=2]

The big question among players. The more people there are on the automated machine at a timet hey are more likely to take money from one and give to another.

I have a friend who has a policy of never play if the machine is alone. His theory is that with more players the machine becomes more random and he has more ability in his game to take money.

This is pure drivel right?

Here are several people who say they have a system that works. For example Superman, Albalaha, Gizmotron, Johnlegend and sorry if I forget anyone.

The question is: if any of them publish the winning system do you think the methods discussion would end?

Why should it not be?. Why argue about systems that do not work after there is one that works published? We will have to wait for some kind soul let the system publicly for all to see.

It would be interesting to see if after a forum member publishes a system that works people will continue discussing Martingale rehashed.

What is your opinion?

This book is very good friends. I highly recommend it. This was published in the previous private section and there was a good contribution regarding the same. I do not know if you can bring that message or if each member must be the one that brings his message to be sure.

I guess so. I strongly say that when you have a moment give the book a look.

All systems including bad systems may serve to turn an idea that leads to create a better new system. It is common to be based on something prior to doing something new.

Thank you for your opinion friends.

Thanks friends for your participation and support. This forum is part of our ways and it would be good to know where we are headed.

About registration I think the only way to make the guests to register is by restricting what they can see. It can be set for the downloads. Maybe new software exclusively for members so the guests do not see it and become motivated to register.

There should be no opposition because we are not denying anything to the person only to register to enjoy more benefits.

With the new registrations it can come new discussion. I think we are kind people who are pleased to interact. Even if we do not win the random games we won in friendship and sincere camaraderie which is worth more.

Google search: roulette system filetype:doc

Google search: mayer roulette system pdf

Google search: flamingtorch roulette system.pdf