Quote from: Dane on February 20, 2017, 10:15:06 AM
The head line almost says it all. Simply register the streets ( in area 1-36) as they come. In accordance with the table layout.
I bet that exactly two adjacent streets come. Three is a crowd, you know So if 1-3 has come (but not 7-9) simply bet 4-6. If 31-33 has come, I accordingly bet 34-46 and 28-30 (25-27 must be sleeping in this case). Before long the patterns exclude more pairs. This may be the best part: A rather limited bet selection.
More pairs may turn up. My  deadline is at 20 spins, and I prefer to bet flat.

Thank you for sharing this system friend . one simple question: has this method been tested with a moderate progression already? many flat betting methods can be improved handsomely with a limited progression in my opinion.

Arxiv is a page about technical topics such as physics where you can find some roulette PDF downloads such as:

Predicting the outcome of roulette
https://arxiv.org/abs/1204.6412

Biased Roulette Wheel: A Quantitative Trading Strategy Approach
https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.09601

others:
https://arxiv.org/find/all/1/all:+roulette/0/1/0/all/0/1

Routledge International Handbook of Internet Gambling:

http://dspace.ubvu.vu.nl/bitstream/handle/1871/38363/Regulation%26Reputation.Gibraltar.Handbook.2012.pdf?sequence=1

Maybe there is something new for someone:

http://www.geocities.ws/roulette/

Friend, thanks for posting. how good Kimo Li is still being studied. students often make the teacher think.

why not a split? or one street or a corner? If something works for numbers it may be useful for the others.

Quote from: System Gambler on October 02, 2016, 12:15:48 PMAny suggestions which casino and wheel I should use for my next challenge

www.dublinbet.com

It is the closest thing to being there sitting at the real table while still using a software tracker.

Recently a topic discussing one of the presidential candidates was erased. one always wonders if one candidate is favored over the other. careful with this: for many to erase the thread is their answer ............ I better stop here.

Although it is my blog I ask: please do not mention names of any of the candidates in this thread. would like opinions about the fact and not the content. thank you.

Quote from: BEAT-THE-WHEEL on September 30, 2016, 02:57:04 AM
Gentlemen,
I had emphasis about the need,
for a STABLE bet selection,
for so many time,
that you must already fed-up,
when I bring up this subject again.

Not at all, please talk about it extensively.

Quote from: BEAT-THE-WHEEL on September 30, 2016, 02:57:04 AMA stable selection,
simply mean,
a strategy, to bet,
if you FLAT-bet it,
it will produce a result,
say after 100, 200, 300 attempt,

it will LOSE, at math expectation.

Thank you very much for bringing the issue to the forefront of discussion.
My understanding: the mission as a player who does not have the mathematical advantage is  to find a stable selection to use with a MM that can withstand fluctuations. Between the two the selection would be more irrelevant: to find the MM to resist is what would be worth more. I would like to see more discussion on this topic.

Friend, please continue posting videos. Everyone is free to have an opinion including that of using the GUT.

Sometimes I really do not understand why others are obfuscated by the way a person wants to play with his money.

Even though you never want it to happen systems always appear to run out over time. The method that was ravaging last month can hardly stand this month or it is outright in loss.

What is your advice? should we put it away and find another new method? should we make incremental tweaks to bring the method back and try again the next month or next year?

Throughout my life I have used many systems. it always comes a time when I wonder why continue with a system that is losing. It happens to all.  what is your suggestion for dealing with this?  Thank you very much for your opinion.

Thanks to all who participated . Apparently we agree that more than 18 numbers is not the way.

Quote from: MarkTeruya on June 12, 2016, 05:26:19 PM
Isn't it real easy to bet 28 number though, H/L plus the opposing Doz

Good one. Now H / L + Doz will be labeled as the easiest HG to play .

I also noticed that there is a general decrease in the quality of posts in the forums . soon the martingale on red will be declared as the best system in the world and roulette will be accepted as beaten in the forums. 99.99 ...% probability of winning so the martingale is the ultimate system ,perhaps what follows is to bet all 37 numbers to have a guaranteed hit. who cares about profit?  I still do a splits system at my local casino. not as much as I wanted to and yes I have had ups and downs, but my splits has been the most consistent method to me. sometimes I put it aside and prove others. I am guilty of that but when I use the same method for long there always comes a time when it is a struggle to achieve taking it to previous levels. I do not know why but it is what it is and anyone who plays in real life knows this. now what I do is give it a rest.

By alternating methods I have had much better luck in my last casino visits. maybe it is due to it being just random luck but I do not have a HG and I am not sorry to say it. I do not know why everyone now has an HG but is not at the casino. I agree that these HG players have not bet real chips on their 28 numbers at a crowded table where you must be elbowing others to put the chip on the numbers on time.

Quote from: pedro on June 12, 2016, 03:28:43 AM
Found the answer at the Huxley web site under the wheel maintenance area, now that puts another spanner in the works , to overcome.

please explain more about this. thank you.