I was trying to understand sports betting better and was going through lots of reading while I was travelling to and returning from Coventry. I came across this and it sounded very interesting. But when I did my maths, they are not adding up.
Anything more than two accumulations is not stacking up. For eg, lets consider 3 games. An accumulator bet winning all 3 will yield better profits compared to betting all 3 individually. But at the same time, even if 1 result doesn't go my way, individual bets are taking a far better position compared to accumulators.
I might be missing something here. What are your views on it?