This thread is devoted to the "ultimate" bet of roulette: only one number.
Feel free to suggest your way.
The patient waker
Mark off every until only one number is left.
Wait (patiently) until this number shows.
Bet on it until a hit or 36 spins at most.
The latest repeater
"Look backwards" on every spin, until you spot the first number to repeat.
Bet this number while keeping the backwards-looking process.
When a new number repeats, switch the bet.
The Matrix Filler
On a 6 x 6 matrix, bet the number that completes a 6-number straight line, in any direction.
Illustrative examples:
Vertical:
[attachimg=1]
Horizontal:
[attachimg=2]
Diagonal:
[attachimg=3]
[attachimg=4]
Single numbers in rotation
Play for 37 spins marking off each number when it hits. After the 37 spins, pick any one of the remaining numbers and back it for 24 spins or until it hits (keep crossing off the numbers as they come in). If your chosen number hasn't hit after the 24 spins, pick another of the remaining unhit numbers and back it for 20 spins or until it hits (keep crossing off the numbers). If again no hit, then pick another of the remaining numbers and back it for 16 spins or until a win. If necessary, back any remaining numbers one at a time, again for 16 spins only.
If the series shows a loss, repeat the whole procedure using 2 units on each number. If the 2nd series shows a loss, repeat once more with a stake of 3 units.
If the loss is less than 24 units after any series, use a stake of 1u on the next series. If it's over 24 but less than 60, use a stake of 2u, if it's over 60 use 3u.
Boring to play but can be very profitable.
Quote from: Bayes on November 27, 2012, 04:07:59 PM
Boring to play but can be very profitable.
That's the only thing that matters dear friend :)
It's never boring to win!
The longest zone bridge
Wheel-based.
You start noting numbers then bet the "1-number hole" that would make the longest zone bridge.
{REWORDING IT}
Quote from: VLS on November 27, 2012, 04:24:34 PM
The longest zone bridge
OMG love this thread already. Please give some example for this bet.
I love this idea also, you could use that idea to play reverse roulette.
So these are interesting bet selection choices. What about a very long progression to pick up an eventual winner?
Quote from: Gizmotron on November 27, 2012, 05:56:59 PM
So these are interesting bet selection choices. What about a very long progression to pick up an eventual winner?
Why don't you suggest one, Gizmo?
I'm rewording the "bridge" post, better to use "longest zone by gap" or something along those lines, since it conveys the message in a clearer way ... making some illustrative charts too...
Feel free to continue posting. I'll just edit the posts above and advice here :nod:
Quote from: KingsRoulette on November 27, 2012, 06:37:03 PM
Why don't you suggest one, Gizmo?
It's my turn to be lazy. I was planning on perfecting one for the past two months. But someone may have a good one. Here is a hint. Even the hottest number has intervals as long as 50-60 spins without hitting, while still being the hottest number occurring.
Quote from: Gizmotron on November 27, 2012, 06:51:19 PM
It's my turn to be lazy. I was planning on perfecting one for the past two months. But someone may have a good one. Here is a hint. Even the hottest number has intervals as long as 50-60 spins without hitting, while still being the hottest number occurring.
Actually, I worked upon the hottest number, way back. It doesn't only have intervals of 50-60 but even 3-4 time of that, even after remaining the hottest.
Playing one number can never be a good idea. Whatever parameter you guys have discussed in this topic, doesn't make it a good bet.
it is more about MM than bet selection.
Hmmm, we have a smart one. It's very true, what you just said. And inside that wisdom is the true reason that Pattern Breaker fails. All progression based systems have their killer sequence that occur just often enough to take back all your winnings. That's assuming that you start out in a win streak.
While reading this topic, I also saw the albalaha's open challenge and the performance of number 3 is really bad in zumma. I do have zumma book in excel format.
If we select any one number by any parameter, it may lead to similar fate as #3 had.
There is no universal principle, that can help in opting a number that WILL NOT BEHAVE RUDELY LATER.
I play often just one number. it is 2/3 to get a hit in 37 spins. I play one number, add on on a hit and run sometimes several hundrad spins a session.
They use to work. To be back 400 is not any serious problem, a hitting cluster can take it back fast. I have got a sleeper of over 400 spins and still ended plus. Can not remember a have made any bigger loss using just one number.
As in all play you can get very bad luck, and lose large, this goes for any way of play.
Same ol' thing............
Track all numbers. When one has slept 74 spins, note it. When hit finally hits, bet it for ten spins. Do that with as many numbers as qualify. Use a progression that suits your fancy.
You may be surprised how many "wakers" hit the second time within ten spins. Sometimes back-to-back.
It's just beastly slow and simply must be played as a companion system to something else. Someone ever wrote me a tracker for it.
Sam
Sam!
It can be coded as script . I have to understand the rules. Look for and catch all sleepers at at least 74 spins and then bet.
It may sometimes take time to find any number at all, and what are we playing until finding a number tp bet?
The rules are this: When ANY number has slept for 74 or more spins, it becomes a candidate for betting. When it hits, bet it for the next ten spins then let it go. You could have several qualifiers under this rule. Bet each qualifier with it's own progression. When one wins, that ends that progression. When one loses, pause the progression and wait for another qualifier. The take up the progression right where you left off. Never start a new progression if you have a paused one.
Now, logic says you must wait at least 75 spins---74 to sleep and the first hit. What do you do while waiting? Play another system or program the thing into a bot and just let it run. I favor playing other systems.
I cannot give an iron-clad guarantee this will work throughout eternity, but I have used it a lot in the past and I never once lost. My progressions would climb, but they always closed with a winner within the ten spins. It just happens.
As I said, I have a tracker somewhere. Someone made it just for this system.
Sam
Sam!
I coded it, but it is not exactly how you explained here. I have run it three times, as it can take very long time. Bv do not let you play without betting, so I bet the smallest on red until a number would come out. If all numbers shows within 72 spins the tracking will continue until a 72 spins sleeper is in the history. Not only that, it must hit once. I had between 98 and 279 spins before the script shifted from flat on red and then I use a slow progression as I do in M7. Add a chip on every hit. I set the win target to 100 units and got it all three times. I am not sure if 100 is the right win target, but it should be.
As the runs takes time I will not yet know for sure if the script not can behave unexpected.
What I do is to place all numbers in a stack, then check the 72 last if it is so many or all to see if a 72 sleeper is found. If not found play a red EC.
If found I compare the last number to make sure it is not only sleeping it is hitting now. I did first a misstake to compare after adding to the stack, which result in a number will never qualifying, as it has become a recent number. If the compare match I put the number to be bet. The progression will then automatic add one if hit again.
Here is the way I would play it if I could write the tracker:
First Second Third ........and so on.
3
18 18
21 21 21
8 8 8
7 7 7
27 27 27
The 3 appears as the oldest number in the first column. It may or may not appear in columns two and three and so on. Each column is as if another person sat down at that exact time and began tracking.
Assume the 3 slept for 74 spins. Assume it hit on the 76th spin. It would become the bet and also go into the second, third and so on. Sooner or later you would be tracking 37 columns waiting for a column to have sleepers that have slept 74 times.
You can see why I only played it with one column!
While playing the G.U.T. I saw many numbers sleep for over 74 spins. It's not that uncommon.
Sam