Just so we're all clear about terminology:

A row = 5 5 5 5 5

A column =
5
5
5
5
5

Quote from: esoito on March 31, 2013, 09:16:10 AM
Just so we're all clear about terminology:

A row = 5 5 5 5 5

A column =
5
5
5
5
5

I am sorry for not using the right words in the first place! So the goal is at least four "oners" next to each other in a row and/or a column. On the horizontal and/or vertical level  Or at least five repeated numbers next to each other...etc.
Are we able to continue testing?

70 Sessions


+192


= 2.74 average


Just suffered a -63 point loss which hit the average.  Biggest single loss so far -112.


Trebor

Jan-Aug 2012
Jan: +176
Feb: +282
Mar: -2
Apr: -29
May: +155
Jun:  +448
Jul:  -23
Aug: +85


Total: +1092 in 240 sessions
(avg. 4.55)

Among the free lists (available on line) with winning numbers from Spielbank Wiesbaden are amazing ones from 24.12.2011 and 25.12.2011. See for yourself!  I lost all units. I gave up analyzing all horizontal and vertical groups. And now I am looking at diagonal  groups.

Would you believe that? Of course not! Not on the first day of April! You are not  easily fooled. On the contrary you might participate (like Trebor and monaco) in what is beginning to look like scientific research. Or is it just foolish superstition and    Beginner´s Luck?

AT THE END OF THE YEAR (31.12.2011, table 3) I had my 357Th hit. Total: 1246 units. We don´t need a scientific calculator to see that the average per month is a bit more than 100 units in my test series. In thery I needed 300 units to get me through that year.
Monaco is using the lists from 2012. Without transcending Time I am choosing another year now: 2010.
                                                                                                                                                    Dane

89 sessions.


+263


= 2.95 average


Trebor

137 sessions.


+797


= 5.81 average per session




Trebor

Jan-Dec 2012


Jan: +176
Feb: +282
Mar: -2
Apr: -29
May: +155
Jun:  +448
Jul:  -23
Aug: +85
Sept: -195   
Oct:  +97   
Nov: +368      
Dec: +207   




Total: +1569 in 358 sessions
(avg. 4.38)




largest single session loss: -155u
biggest drawdown from highest point: -271u




Similar results to those obtained by Dane for 2011 - a 300u bank would've been sufficient.
An average of about +130u per month, playing a single game per day.

good job
monaco
i go this aternoon at monaco town lol!

Quote from: monaco on April 04, 2013, 11:26:30 AM
Jan-Dec 2012


Jan: +176
Feb: +282
Mar: -2
Apr: -29
May: +155
Jun:  +448
Jul:  -23
Aug: +85
Sept: -195   
Oct:  +97   
Nov: +368     
Dec: +207   




Total: +1569 in 358 sessions
(avg. 4.38)




largest single session loss: -155u
biggest drawdown from highest point: -271u




Similar results to those obtained by Dane for 2011 - a 300u bank would've been sufficient.
An average of about +130u per month, playing a single game per day.

Congratulations, monaco! I hope that we´ll be able to continue our test series. It is true that a 300u bank would´ve been sufficient for me for 2011. But I do not think it is a natural law.  SOONER OR LATER A BIGGER  DRAWDOWN MUST COME . It has already happened to me:
  The highest point in my test series came with my 349Th hit (21.12.2011):1479u. I ended that year at 1246u. The twenty first sessions from my next chosen year (2010) made me 10 units richer. BUT THEN the next five days, sessions or hits made me drop 283 units.  Be prepared to drop at least 500 units!
My total after 13 months (table 3, Spielbank Wiesbaden):1075 units.
                                                                                                                         Danr

                                                                           
                                                                           

205 sessions.


+911


+4.44 average


Trebor

455 sessions.

+670       

Be prepared to drop at least 800 units!

Dane,


Have you had many sessions with losses over 100?


In my 205 I've had


-119
-108
-112
-95


Trebor

Hi Trebor! I did not keep my old notes, so I am unable to tell you the number of losses over 100.  I do not think I had many. Two losses over 50, however, must be as hard as one  loss over 100. Four losses over 25 must be as hard as one over 100. And so forth and so on.

you should use a stop loss of 35 units
anything over that while flatbetting is pointless