First Shoe up to where we stopped:
[attachimg=1]
Second shoe up to where we stopped:
[attachimg=2]
Third shoe up to where we stopped:
[attachimg=3]
And here is how we played them and sectioned them as the hands progressed. Once again. Sectioning is not a pre-thought and pre-scheduled procedure, you do it as the hands are presented and section off the events to eliminate the strong from the weak, seldom will the entire shoe (or at least the highest majority of time) stay the same. Argue if you desire but it is true.
I and those around me the majority of the time desire to play with the presentments rather than hoping for the cut on every hand wagered. Do not misunderstand, if it is chopping or doubles, playing the opposite side is not a cut, it is playing with the shoe. We win far greater amounts of wagers by following small sections and then waiting for the shoe to change and follow once again.
[attachimg=4]
[attachimg=5]
[attachimg=6]
We all did very well with a One + One and then a 2 + 2 and then a 4 + 4 and then back down to one or increased to two units and do the same thing once again pulling down 7 or 14 units if we completed three wins, no matter if we waited out hands or consecutively played hands.